Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Those needles littering the streets? Yeah, the city handed them out - religious left strikes again
Comments
-
I'm pretty sure all are issues. However, your meme is using stats to lie and Bob is jacking off to it right now.Sledog said:
Heroine kills. A lot. Those that are not dead yet are a drain on our society and commit crimes to support their habit. Maybe we should outlaw heroine again.HHusky said:
I’m not advocating that the junkies roam amongst you. That is a separate issue.PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
We pay one way or the other. I propose we pay less instead of more.
-
In Jesus' name.Sledog said:We just need an island for dumping these shit bags on. We have several used for naval gunnery practice seems like the ideal place. We'll drop food by air.
-
A person who knowlingly battles alcoholism? No - I wouldn't do that. Don't ever surmise I would. Only a sadist would do that.HHusky said:
Would I serve a recovering alcoholic an alcoholic beverage? I assume a recovering alcoholic wouldn't request that I do so. I am very close to a guy who has been sober 30 years. If he requested a drink, I'd have a lot of questions.PurpleThrobber said:
You didn't answer the question. Do you buy drinks for alcoholics at bars or give cocktails to recovering alcoholics at social gatherings?HHusky said:
Fucking isn’t the only way to contract an illness.PurpleThrobber said:
Non-Darwin award winners don't go around fucking heroin addicts.HHusky said:
Funny story. Those diseases are communicable.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, yeah it will. They die.HHusky said:
Call em free needles. I don’t give a shit.TurdBomber said:
Stop lying and calling them "exchanges." They don't "exchange" Jack shit. Hence, this thread. Quality of Life in affected areas has precipitously dropped as parents can't take kids to parks, coaches have to pre-screen play fields for "sharps" as people like you call them, and addicts steal anything that isn't bolted down to support their habit, and use our sidewalks as toilets.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
I didn't realize you'd actually put effort into being so stupid. That might be the dumbest question you've asked. And that's saying something, considering the source.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous. Uh, no. They're extremely accurate and supported by evidence you keep droning on about.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
The consequences you’ve listed are the consequences of addiction. Addiction isn’t going away simply because you propose to add HIV and hepatitis epidemics to the mix.
Hard to shoot up when one is dead.
Do you not have one bit of a moral dilemma giving 'these people' the very weapons that will cause there demise? Do you also buy recovering alcoholics drinks? Or knowingly offer them cocktails at your tailgates?
I’d prefer addicts receive treatment. But relapse is common even for those who are able to get help. Some will relapse many times before getting and staying clean. In the meantime, most heroin addicts can function reasonably well if they don’t have to engage in risky behaviors in order to get and use opiates.
Would I buy an alcoholic a drink at a bar? Yes. Of course. I'll bet I have. I'll bet you have.
Why then would you give the delivery method to addicts? Selfishly so you don't catch the FBA or hepatitis? There's no other logical explanation.
-
Make up your mind. A recovering alcoholic is one thing--alcohol is the drug you absolutely should have medical assistance with if you are an addict and want to quit. I'm not going to help a recovering alcoholic start drinking again. But an alcoholic is someone who must drink absent medical help quitting. Withdrawal is misery, but alcohol withdrawal can be fatal. So thanks for killing alcoholics, PT!PurpleThrobber said:
A person who knowlingly battles alcoholism? No - I wouldn't do that. Don't ever surmise I would. Only a sadist would do that.HHusky said:
Would I serve a recovering alcoholic an alcoholic beverage? I assume a recovering alcoholic wouldn't request that I do so. I am very close to a guy who has been sober 30 years. If he requested a drink, I'd have a lot of questions.PurpleThrobber said:
You didn't answer the question. Do you buy drinks for alcoholics at bars or give cocktails to recovering alcoholics at social gatherings?HHusky said:
Fucking isn’t the only way to contract an illness.PurpleThrobber said:
Non-Darwin award winners don't go around fucking heroin addicts.HHusky said:
Funny story. Those diseases are communicable.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, yeah it will. They die.HHusky said:
Call em free needles. I don’t give a shit.TurdBomber said:
Stop lying and calling them "exchanges." They don't "exchange" Jack shit. Hence, this thread. Quality of Life in affected areas has precipitously dropped as parents can't take kids to parks, coaches have to pre-screen play fields for "sharps" as people like you call them, and addicts steal anything that isn't bolted down to support their habit, and use our sidewalks as toilets.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
I didn't realize you'd actually put effort into being so stupid. That might be the dumbest question you've asked. And that's saying something, considering the source.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous. Uh, no. They're extremely accurate and supported by evidence you keep droning on about.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
The consequences you’ve listed are the consequences of addiction. Addiction isn’t going away simply because you propose to add HIV and hepatitis epidemics to the mix.
Hard to shoot up when one is dead.
Do you not have one bit of a moral dilemma giving 'these people' the very weapons that will cause there demise? Do you also buy recovering alcoholics drinks? Or knowingly offer them cocktails at your tailgates?
I’d prefer addicts receive treatment. But relapse is common even for those who are able to get help. Some will relapse many times before getting and staying clean. In the meantime, most heroin addicts can function reasonably well if they don’t have to engage in risky behaviors in order to get and use opiates.
Would I buy an alcoholic a drink at a bar? Yes. Of course. I'll bet I have. I'll bet you have.
Why then would you give the delivery method to addicts? Selfishly so you don't catch the FBA or hepatitis? There's no other logical explanation.
-
Hondo doesn't use anything to lie, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I'm pretty sure all are issues. However, your meme is using stats to lie and Bob is jacking off to it right now.Sledog said:
Heroine kills. A lot. Those that are not dead yet are a drain on our society and commit crimes to support their habit. Maybe we should outlaw heroine again.HHusky said:
I’m not advocating that the junkies roam amongst you. That is a separate issue.PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
We pay one way or the other. I propose we pay less instead of more.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
And it doesn't go un-noticed that Hondo the pathological lying sick fuck is sitting around envisioning me jacking off.
Fucking pervert. -
My stance hasn't changed a bit. You're the one waffling. I'm trying to figure out why you would help enable one form of addiction and now vehemently deny providing the same delivery system for alcoholics.HHusky said:
Make up your mind. A recovering alcoholic is one thing--alcohol is the drug you absolutely should have medical assistance with if you are an addict and want to quit. I'm not going to help a recovering alcoholic start drinking again. But an alcoholic is someone who must drink absent medical help quitting. Withdrawal is misery, but alcohol withdrawal can be fatal. So thanks for killing alcoholics, PT!PurpleThrobber said:
A person who knowlingly battles alcoholism? No - I wouldn't do that. Don't ever surmise I would. Only a sadist would do that.HHusky said:
Would I serve a recovering alcoholic an alcoholic beverage? I assume a recovering alcoholic wouldn't request that I do so. I am very close to a guy who has been sober 30 years. If he requested a drink, I'd have a lot of questions.PurpleThrobber said:
You didn't answer the question. Do you buy drinks for alcoholics at bars or give cocktails to recovering alcoholics at social gatherings?HHusky said:
Fucking isn’t the only way to contract an illness.PurpleThrobber said:
Non-Darwin award winners don't go around fucking heroin addicts.HHusky said:
Funny story. Those diseases are communicable.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, yeah it will. They die.HHusky said:
Call em free needles. I don’t give a shit.TurdBomber said:
Stop lying and calling them "exchanges." They don't "exchange" Jack shit. Hence, this thread. Quality of Life in affected areas has precipitously dropped as parents can't take kids to parks, coaches have to pre-screen play fields for "sharps" as people like you call them, and addicts steal anything that isn't bolted down to support their habit, and use our sidewalks as toilets.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
I didn't realize you'd actually put effort into being so stupid. That might be the dumbest question you've asked. And that's saying something, considering the source.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous. Uh, no. They're extremely accurate and supported by evidence you keep droning on about.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
The consequences you’ve listed are the consequences of addiction. Addiction isn’t going away simply because you propose to add HIV and hepatitis epidemics to the mix.
Hard to shoot up when one is dead.
Do you not have one bit of a moral dilemma giving 'these people' the very weapons that will cause there demise? Do you also buy recovering alcoholics drinks? Or knowingly offer them cocktails at your tailgates?
I’d prefer addicts receive treatment. But relapse is common even for those who are able to get help. Some will relapse many times before getting and staying clean. In the meantime, most heroin addicts can function reasonably well if they don’t have to engage in risky behaviors in order to get and use opiates.
Would I buy an alcoholic a drink at a bar? Yes. Of course. I'll bet I have. I'll bet you have.
Why then would you give the delivery method to addicts? Selfishly so you don't catch the FBA or hepatitis? There's no other logical explanation.
You are in favor of providing the delivery method for addicts to sustain their addiction. As long as it is heroin and you can't catch the FBA or hepatitis from them. Got it.
-
Take a look at O'Keefed's "compassion" in action.
And think of all the money we're saving.
-
-
I said I would buy an alcoholic a drink. There is less harm in an alcoholic drinking than in an alcoholic being forced to go cold turkey.PurpleThrobber said:
My stance hasn't changed a bit. You're the one waffling. I'm trying to figure out why you would help enable one form of addiction and now vehemently deny providing the same delivery system for alcoholics.HHusky said:
Make up your mind. A recovering alcoholic is one thing--alcohol is the drug you absolutely should have medical assistance with if you are an addict and want to quit. I'm not going to help a recovering alcoholic start drinking again. But an alcoholic is someone who must drink absent medical help quitting. Withdrawal is misery, but alcohol withdrawal can be fatal. So thanks for killing alcoholics, PT!PurpleThrobber said:
A person who knowlingly battles alcoholism? No - I wouldn't do that. Don't ever surmise I would. Only a sadist would do that.HHusky said:
Would I serve a recovering alcoholic an alcoholic beverage? I assume a recovering alcoholic wouldn't request that I do so. I am very close to a guy who has been sober 30 years. If he requested a drink, I'd have a lot of questions.PurpleThrobber said:
You didn't answer the question. Do you buy drinks for alcoholics at bars or give cocktails to recovering alcoholics at social gatherings?HHusky said:
Fucking isn’t the only way to contract an illness.PurpleThrobber said:
Non-Darwin award winners don't go around fucking heroin addicts.HHusky said:
Funny story. Those diseases are communicable.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, yeah it will. They die.HHusky said:
Call em free needles. I don’t give a shit.TurdBomber said:
Stop lying and calling them "exchanges." They don't "exchange" Jack shit. Hence, this thread. Quality of Life in affected areas has precipitously dropped as parents can't take kids to parks, coaches have to pre-screen play fields for "sharps" as people like you call them, and addicts steal anything that isn't bolted down to support their habit, and use our sidewalks as toilets.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
I didn't realize you'd actually put effort into being so stupid. That might be the dumbest question you've asked. And that's saying something, considering the source.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous. Uh, no. They're extremely accurate and supported by evidence you keep droning on about.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
The consequences you’ve listed are the consequences of addiction. Addiction isn’t going away simply because you propose to add HIV and hepatitis epidemics to the mix.
Hard to shoot up when one is dead.
Do you not have one bit of a moral dilemma giving 'these people' the very weapons that will cause there demise? Do you also buy recovering alcoholics drinks? Or knowingly offer them cocktails at your tailgates?
I’d prefer addicts receive treatment. But relapse is common even for those who are able to get help. Some will relapse many times before getting and staying clean. In the meantime, most heroin addicts can function reasonably well if they don’t have to engage in risky behaviors in order to get and use opiates.
Would I buy an alcoholic a drink at a bar? Yes. Of course. I'll bet I have. I'll bet you have.
Why then would you give the delivery method to addicts? Selfishly so you don't catch the FBA or hepatitis? There's no other logical explanation.
You are in favor of providing the delivery method for addicts to sustain their addiction. As long as it is heroin and you can't catch the FBA or hepatitis from them. Got it.
I wouldn't knowingly encourage any person trying to recover from addiction to start using again.
I have no problem providing safe places and equipment to people who are addicted though. I would be willing to pay taxes {shudder} to make treatment more readily available too. -
That's the BART station in downtown SF.
-
PT is going to build them a fenced off space of their own. Okay by me.SFGbob said:That's the BART station in downtown SF.
-
You have zero self awareness. At all. With your constant pedo homoerotic shitposts.SFGbob said:
Hondo doesn't use anything to lie, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I'm pretty sure all are issues. However, your meme is using stats to lie and Bob is jacking off to it right now.Sledog said:
Heroine kills. A lot. Those that are not dead yet are a drain on our society and commit crimes to support their habit. Maybe we should outlaw heroine again.HHusky said:
I’m not advocating that the junkies roam amongst you. That is a separate issue.PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
We pay one way or the other. I propose we pay less instead of more.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
And it doesn't go un-noticed that Hondo the pathological lying sick fuck is sitting around envisioning me jacking off.
Fucking pervert. -
So building a wall to keep our own citizens away is OK but building more to keep illegals out is immoral.HHusky said:
PT is going to build them a fenced off space of their own. Okay by me.SFGbob said:That's the BART station in downtown SF.
I’ve illustrated a false equivalency. You should look into the definition of this before you poast again on this subject. -
The ariolas, the nipples, the yummy tummy and the perfect little CT. @TurdBomber wins the thread. @DerekJohnson, lock it down.TurdBomber said:
How long before you're responded to with "mass incarceration" or "Hitler" replies?PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
Oh, hey @PurpleThrobber: This ones for you.
Is that a Star of David necklace she's wearing?!?!?! -
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do? -
Has anyone told Rush?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do? -
It takes a keen eye- but the glasses also incorporate the hot teacher/librarian angle. Well done @TurdBomber.salemcoog said:
The ariolas, the nipples, the yummy tummy and the perfect little CT. @TurdBomber wins the thread. @DerekJohnson, lock it down.TurdBomber said:
How long before you're responded to with "mass incarceration" or "Hitler" replies?PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
Oh, hey @PurpleThrobber: This ones for you.
Is that a Star of David necklace she's wearing?!?!?!
-
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do? -
Why?HHusky said:
Has anyone told Rush?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do? -
PurpleThrobber said:
It takes a keen eye- but the glasses also incorporate the hot teacher/librarian angle. Well done @TurdBomber.salemcoog said:
The ariolas, the nipples, the yummy tummy and the perfect little CT. @TurdBomber wins the thread. @DerekJohnson, lock it down.TurdBomber said:
How long before you're responded to with "mass incarceration" or "Hitler" replies?PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
Oh, hey @PurpleThrobber: This ones for you.
Is that a Star of David necklace she's wearing?!?!?!
The glasses also protect her eyes from the spider webs. Safety first! -
She's not your type @salemcoogsalemcoog said:
The ariolas, the nipples, the yummy tummy and the perfect little CT. @TurdBomber wins the thread. @DerekJohnson, lock it down.TurdBomber said:
How long before you're responded to with "mass incarceration" or "Hitler" replies?PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
Oh, hey @PurpleThrobber: This ones for you.
Is that a Star of David necklace she's wearing?!?!?! -
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Just wondered why he committed so many felonies before taking a month off to get clean.RaceBannon said:
Why?HHusky said:
Has anyone told Rush?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do? -
So the usual nothingHHusky said:
Just wondered why he committed so many felonies before taking a month off to get clean.RaceBannon said:
Why?HHusky said:
Has anyone told Rush?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
He quit using his free will. -
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Except that the concept of government as social engineer is outside of the premise of government as limited to protecting ones individual freedoms. Enumerated powers is a dead concept on the left.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
That's because all of the policies you advocate align with your ideological beliefs. Of course you don't care what label they carry.HHusky said:
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
True. I am ideologically practical.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's because all of the policies you advocate align with your ideological beliefs. Of course you don't care what label they carry.HHusky said:
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Microsoft cockblocked my edit.HHusky said:
True. I am ideologicallyUW_Doog_Bot said:
That's because all of the policies you advocate align with your ideological beliefs. Of course you don't care what label they carry.HHusky said:
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess.practicalretardedchallenged.
