Those needles littering the streets? Yeah, the city handed them out - religious left strikes again
Comments
-
The whys and how’s of scattering used needles or shitting on the sidewalk don’t merit debate. But there’s always some enabling dunce who’ll pick up the shitters’ cause anyway, and they are why West Coast cities suck now.
-
Race.TurdBomber said:
Now who’s being binary?HHusky said:
My relative practices medicine in a healthcare system. He doesn’t run a spa for junkies.RaceBannon said:
And those people don't need fake help like you get from an addiction specialistHHusky said:
Whether it can be “cured” or not, people can recover and manage their disease. For profit grifters often set up bullshit “treatment centers”. Sometimes they set up bullshit “universities” too.RaceBannon said:The best thing about being an addiction specialist is that there is no cure and you get easily addicted people to get addicted to giving you money for the non cure
Nor do they need enablers like you
Is it your deep seeded faith that compels you to argue against providing addicts with medical care? -
TurdBomber said:
Congrats @HHusky. You’ve successfully fagged out another thread with SJW Bullshit. Take a bow.
SJW? It’s a fucking cost saving argument. Addicts gonna addict unless they get help. If they get HIV or hepatitis first, it’s a costlier problem than cleaning the streets. It’s not even debatable. -
Rent freeHHusky said:
Race.TurdBomber said:
Now who’s being binary?HHusky said:
My relative practices medicine in a healthcare system. He doesn’t run a spa for junkies.RaceBannon said:
And those people don't need fake help like you get from an addiction specialistHHusky said:
Whether it can be “cured” or not, people can recover and manage their disease. For profit grifters often set up bullshit “treatment centers”. Sometimes they set up bullshit “universities” too.RaceBannon said:The best thing about being an addiction specialist is that there is no cure and you get easily addicted people to get addicted to giving you money for the non cure
Nor do they need enablers like you
Is it your deep seeded faith that compels you to argue against providing addicts with medical care? -
Addicts are going to addicts even if they get help and you want to know what increases the number of addicts? Giving them free access to open shooting galleries where they know they won't be arrested. Providing them with "free" needles and refusing to prosecute them for the crimes they commit in order to feed their habits. San Francisco has all but rolled out the red carpet the drug addicts. They know here they are safe and won't face much hassle from the police and they'll receive about $500 a month in cash from the county not to mention food stamps that they'll sell. And shockingly, the number of addicts and other assorted dirt-bags has exploded in the city.
San Francisco — where drug addicts outnumber high school students
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/philmatier/article/San-Francisco-where-street-addicts-outnumber-13571702.php
-
Needle exchanges don’t cause drug abuse and the cost savings are immense. There’s actual data on this. It’s not really about your feelings.SFGbob said:Addicts are going to addicts even if they get help and you want to know what increases the number of addicts? Giving them free access to open shooting galleries where they know they won't be arrested. Providing them with "free" needles and refusing to prosecute them for the crimes they commit in order to feed their habits. San Francisco has all but rolled out the red carpet the drug addicts. They know here they are safe and won't face much hassle from the police and they'll receive about $500 a month in cash from the county not to mention food stamps that they'll sell. And shockingly, the number of addicts and other assorted dirt-bags has exploded in the city.
San Francisco — where drug addicts outnumber high school students
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/philmatier/article/San-Francisco-where-street-addicts-outnumber-13571702.php -
Weird the way you ignore everything I said just to fuck a little straw man ass O’keefedHHusky said:
Needle exchanges don’t cause drug abuse and the cost savings are immense. There’s actual data on this. It’s not really about your feelings.SFGbob said:Addicts are going to addicts even if they get help and you want to know what increases the number of addicts? Giving them free access to open shooting galleries where they know they won't be arrested. Providing them with "free" needles and refusing to prosecute them for the crimes they commit in order to feed their habits. San Francisco has all but rolled out the red carpet the drug addicts. They know here they are safe and won't face much hassle from the police and they'll receive about $500 a month in cash from the county not to mention food stamps that they'll sell. And shockingly, the number of addicts and other assorted dirt-bags has exploded in the city.
San Francisco — where drug addicts outnumber high school students
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/philmatier/article/San-Francisco-where-street-addicts-outnumber-13571702.php -
The well informed. Do not post here.
-
They gave me the strongest opiates available for my sports injury and surgery. My addiction to alcohol saved me from being a junkie. I wanted beer more than pills.HHusky said:
Lucky you. I’ve had surgery. I’ve had opiates. I’m just not afflicted with the predisposition to be addicted to them.SFGbob said:
Always with the bullshit excuses for a lack of personal responsibility. Weird how I never used any opiates. I could be one of those easily addicted people but I'll never find out because I never used them.HHusky said:
Always the binary response. Do you have a black and white television?SFGbob said:
So people have no free will. And yes, being a fucking junkie is a personal failure. No one forced you to start and continue using drugs.HHusky said:
Imagine treating addiction as a disease rather than a failure of the will.Sledog said:imagine building safe spaces for illegal activity and that they are popular! Build it and they will come!
Most people weren’t forced to abuse drugs. But there is a readily identifiable portion of the population who will easily become addicted even if the first use of opiates was legal and prescribed. -
No costs saved. They get every disease known to man. Nothing like large open puss oozing sores. Hep A thru Z etc. Maybe you don't realize these people aren't very smart to begin with and a fried brain doesn't help. They'll still use dirty shit and still get sick.HHusky said:TurdBomber said:Congrats @HHusky. You’ve successfully fagged out another thread with SJW Bullshit. Take a bow.
SJW? It’s a fucking cost saving argument. Addicts gonna addict unless they get help. If they get HIV or hepatitis first, it’s a costlier problem than cleaning the streets. It’s not even debatable.
Hell they spend most of their life just trying to take a shit.
