How would you define doog?
Comments
-
Fixedcreepycoug said:
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.oregonblitzkrieg said:Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate peoplewho bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
But I like your spunk. -
Doog is basically a term used these days if you have an opinion about UW football and someone else does not agree with that opinion. We can all thank more cock for that one.
-
yeah ppl close their eyes and shout it at anyone they disagree with. the term has been bastardized.CuntWaffle said:Doog is basically a term used these days if you have an opinion about UW football and someone else does not agree with that opinion. We can all thank more cock for that one.
-
coaching is everythingFire_Marshall_Bill said:
SC is the benchmark. Oregon and Stanford had their little runs, but SC is usually at least a 7 or 8 win team they rarely go more than five years without at least tying for a title. I've never thought of them as a big rival, but it's usually an accomplishment to beat them. If nothing else, you're beating what's usually a more talented group.Pitchfork51 said:Sc cares about notre Dame and UCLA.
Beating Oregon just feels like something you ought to be able to do most years. That makes the yuge losing streak to them all the more pathetic.
belloti (chip as OC)
chip
helfrich (with MM at QB)
vs
Gilby
Ty
Sark
Now that it's Petersen vs Helfrich/Black Sark/Cristobal the shoe is on the other foot. SHOCKER -
I would define Doog to include, without limitation, anyone who talks like this:
Well, say no more...U are an adopted DAWG!
We think of our family as a very TIGHT, CLOSE group. So, you know, you need to prove your loyalty. We already know you are intelligent, but what we really want to see on the DAWG side is you being able to sing "Bow Down to Washington." Chosen as one of the top fight songs in college football.
Looking forward to adding more Dawgs to our huge Husky Nation. It'S ALL about the DAWG life!
Welcome to the Dawg family. Now, here is your homework. Learn the words to "Bow Down to Washington." Here is a link to the song and words.
There are other varieties, but the Doog Legend is a fella named krisvashon, and she knows no equal. -
-
doog is the washington guy version of uoduckgirl.
-
The definition of doog is @haie
-
-
-
She never bashes the kids (especially the African Americans) and trusts the coaches. Strikes me as the kind of gal that would never go to the Zone and sees the two hole as both an exit and an entrance, as well.Pitchfork51 said:doog is the washington guy version of uoduckgirl.
-
Dug too deep.AZDuck said:
And Stanford, strangely enough.Pitchfork51 said:Sc cares about notre Dame and UCLA.
Stanford is an annoyance when good... a la UW currently.
Source: Wife is a USC alum. Brother in law has two (??) natty rings playing under Pete and an NFL pension.
Stanford is still Stanford. Speedbump, like UW, when USC has the right coach.
Never will be a "rival." -
stanford being good is one of the reasons the pac blows and gets even less respect.
When the best team in the conference for several years running has a total of about 12 fans its just embarrassing. -
Yeah, that "rivalry" was manufactured for 5 minutes when Harbaugh was using up his life-time allotment of magic to beat Pete with Stanford kids which, when you consider the drastically different recruiting limitations that Stanford has to live with compared to everyone else in the Pac 12, is still fucking amazing to me.MisterEm said:
Dug too deep.AZDuck said:
And Stanford, strangely enough.Pitchfork51 said:Sc cares about notre Dame and UCLA.
Stanford is an annoyance when good... a la UW currently.
Source: Wife is a USC alum. Brother in law has two (??) natty rings playing under Pete and an NFL pension.
Stanford is still Stanford. Speedbump, like UW, when USC has the right coach.
Never will be a "rival." -
-
So is it masturbation or smoking pot?
Both?
FULL DOOG -
I like to pair them up.RaceBannon said:So is it masturbation or smoking pot?
Both?
FULL DOOG -
If you're old skool Californicator, you know that USC and Stanford fancy themselves rivals, for amusing and mutually exclusive reasons.
-
John Ralston and John McKay will tell you the sameAZDuck said:If you're old skool Californicator, you know that USC and Stanford fancy themselves rivals, for amusing and mutually exclusive reasons.
Stanford got two Rose Bowls and a Heisman at the height of McKay s powers -
Old man Race gets it
-
It's not?Baseman said:
She never bashes the kids (especially the African Americans) and trusts the coaches. Strikes me as the kind of gal that would never go to the Zone and sees the two hole as both an exit and an entrance, as well.Pitchfork51 said:doog is the washington guy version of uoduckgirl.
-
Bump. Twitter is filled with these types right now. It is depressing. I hate them worse than the most white trash duck or pompous Furd fan.Dennis_DeYoung said:A Doog is a Washington fan who is a Cuog.
The most important thing to these people is to lower standards to avoid disappointment. At all costs.
Instead of rooting for signing 5-stars, they say their 2-stars are just as good! Instead of being critical of the coaches, they say 'you try it! it's not so easy' (same for players, although I NEVER bash the players). Instead of saying 'Oregon won' it's 'Oregon cheated'.
They become more obsessed with their hated CHEATING rivals than themselves, because (as a product of lowering standards) they become obsessed with their CHEATING rivals and they want standards to be brought down to their level. Everything else becomes UNFAIR!
Doogs these days HATE Oregon (I don't) and view them as our MAIN RIVAL (how?). They apologize for the Cuogs (this is because they intuitively know the Cuogs use their logic, so they don't hate the Cuogs and their low standards like they should).
They loved Sark because he was the ultimate Doog coach: there are no real standards, but we know he's better than Ty. He let them keep their low standards and hatred of everything with high standards while winning some and providing excitement. Doogs love excitement because they are dumb.
This is why Doogs don't like Pete very much: he ruins all their narratives. This is why Doogs have to credit Sark for SOME of Pete's success (even though it's obvious he contributed nothing to it).
Doogs HATE Ty (although they loved him when he was here until '08) because they can't figure out it was already fucked under Gilby and they want to blame an outsider (Doogs are dumb like that).
Doogs ended up hating Neuheisel because they could blame another outsider (I hate Neu, too).
Doogs are people who instead of wanting greatness, prefer mediocrity because they are unsure greatness is achievable and it hurts them to admit it. They become bitter because they lack confidence in general about the world. And they should all be shot. Along with Cuogs. -
Gladstone said:
Bump. HardcoreHusky.com is filled with these types right now. It is depressing. I hate them worse than the most white trash duck or pompous Furd fan.Dennis_DeYoung said:A Doog is a Washington fan who is a Cuog.
The most important thing to these people is to lower standards to avoid disappointment. At all costs.
Instead of rooting for signing 5-stars, they say their 2-stars are just as good! Instead of being critical of the coaches, they say 'you try it! it's not so easy' (same for players, although I NEVER bash the players). Instead of saying 'Oregon won' it's 'Oregon cheated'.
They become more obsessed with their hated CHEATING rivals than themselves, because (as a product of lowering standards) they become obsessed with their CHEATING rivals and they want standards to be brought down to their level. Everything else becomes UNFAIR!
Doogs these days HATE Oregon (I don't) and view them as our MAIN RIVAL (how?). They apologize for the Cuogs (this is because they intuitively know the Cuogs use their logic, so they don't hate the Cuogs and their low standards like they should).
They loved Sark because he was the ultimate Doog coach: there are no real standards, but we know he's better than Ty. He let them keep their low standards and hatred of everything with high standards while winning some and providing excitement. Doogs love excitement because they are dumb.
This is why Doogs don't like Pete very much: he ruins all their narratives. This is why Doogs have to credit Sark for SOME of Pete's success (even though it's obvious he contributed nothing to it).
Doogs HATE Ty (although they loved him when he was here until '08) because they can't figure out it was already fucked under Gilby and they want to blame an outsider (Doogs are dumb like that).
Doogs ended up hating Neuheisel because they could blame another outsider (I hate Neu, too).
Doogs are people who instead of wanting greatness, prefer mediocrity because they are unsure greatness is achievable and it hurts them to admit it. They become bitter because they lack confidence in general about the world. And they should all be shot. Along with Cuogs.
