Home › PurpleBaze › Activity
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Badges
Show your support for what this community means to you:
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Take a look around and join the community. Have a topic? Join us and start a thread.
PurpleBaze
About
- Username
- PurpleBaze
- Joined
- Visits
- 9,636
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Approved for Fight Club
- Points
- 44,249
- Badges
- 29
- Posts
- 15,474
Activity
-
因此，在第一周，pac12远未完成季后赛。这完全取决于其他球队的失利时间，以及他们输给谁。
还有裘德？你在这个城市无关紧要。最好的Ted Miller仍然是你的两倍。在山顶上的塔科马（Tacoma）爬上你的裂缝回家，真正涵盖赫斯基的做法。凭借你的凭据，实际上用玩家的知识，你的＃，高度，重量等来覆盖游戏。你期望这个哈士奇足球的东西能逃脱多久？自30多年前唐·詹姆斯时代以来，他公然不尊重和无视克里斯彼得森的伤病协议并未加倍。这就是为什么华盛顿大学的教练不信任西雅图时报。唐·詹姆斯被一个冒犯和不尊重的记者焚烧，就像你关于某个QB和陪审团一样。
拿一个朋克弓，媒体整整一圈，你应该受到责备。就像来自美国有线电视新闻网的吉姆·阿科斯塔一样，我希望彼得森不要在压力过程中打电话，因为萨拉桑德斯没有睡觉......我当然不会......！
- 宝贝爱September 13 -
-
尽管Fetters的观点，这场比赛不是对pac12的公投。恰恰相反。残疾辛辛那提和亚利桑那州肯定没有帮助小精灵12，但它是一个漫长的赛季，加州大学洛杉矶分校将得到更好的使用DTR在QB ..很多足球仍然播放。南加州大学，斯坦福大学，并在较小程度上，犹他也是在季后赛中非常多，无关与UW LOSS（与委员会和其他人谁了解大学生足球的道路上我眼中的胜利）。
ACC显然是最糟糕的足球会议，是一支由1支球队组成的联盟。如果在这次会议上，他们有显著倾向做（如果您是大学橄榄球超过10年）克莱姆森蹒跚，他们准备NO华盛顿和pac12。该ACC没有斯坦福大学，南加州大学，俄勒冈州或者犹他（鸭决定玩一）今年。他们没有人。佛罗里达州立大学的ACC＃2被弗吉尼亚理工大学的ACC队伍和非常普通的队伍严重烧伤。工作人员与华盛顿街或亚利桑那州街相提并论
南加州大学和斯坦福大学仍在打出精彩的比赛。尽管早期的pac12失利，斯坦福仍有合法的季后赛席位。刚敲ND，UW。南加州大学甚至在德克萨斯州遭遇损失。只需运行表格，点击ND即可。犹他......管理他们所在的桌子。所以它并不像费特斯先生让我们相信的那么可怕。如果南加州大学击败德克萨斯州，那肯定会对每个人都有所帮助，但对于一个18岁的qb大订单来说肯定会有所帮助。
德克萨斯州和俄克拉荷马州正按时获得pac12。南加州大学和加州大学洛杉矶分校分别在QB开始成为真正的新生（如果Chip Kelly与Thompson-Robinson合作），T-R将是一个伟大的QB。他真的是那个人。委员会理解这一点。他们意识到ACC是一个垃圾场，与USC的JT丹尼尔斯和加州大学洛杉矶分校的多里安汤普森 - 罗宾逊一起，Pac 12仍然比包括弗朗索瓦在内的任何人都要优于FSU和VT。 USC是Puppy心目中第四好的pac12球队，仍然优于ACC的第二，第三和第四......September 13 -
-
谁更糟，Adam Jude还是Chris Fetters？其中一个，一个卑鄙的吉姆阿科斯塔，试图在克里斯彼得森，另一个，20年的典型低预算作家，产生一个“抓住所有时刻”，试图相关。一个是西雅图时报（一个芭芭拉对冲的情人谁不喜欢哈士奇，第九章的支持者，急切地想了30年摧毁有利于妇女的篮球和垒球的喧闹足球）...另一种是政治上正确的网站，完全导演，Kim Grinolds（内容负责人）禁止任何与哈士奇足球不同意的用户。例如，如果你不喜欢的方式杰克布朗宁是玩，不说一句话......你将寻找像性交赫斯基一个新的平台来传达自己的观点和意见。 HardcoreHusky.com允许您在没有永久禁止网站的情况下与您交谈，分享您的意见。哦，它也可以免费加入。首席执行官德里克·约翰逊（Derek Johnson）是一位真正的长期粉丝，他鼓励热烈讨论足球问题
走了，然后走了，然后在'奥本''失去'之后立即从赫斯基板上跳下来。他写的网站dawgman.com匆匆的比赛结束后立即页面访问量的第一页上明确戏剧性和无知片，声称哈士奇，和类似的程度，吃豆12在使高校足球季后赛的机会，基本上是关于!!!!是的，他这么说。
他应该知道9月1日从未决定任何赛季的全国冠军（AP /教练，篮球，季后赛）。 EVER。
他现在负责一个疲惫而懒散的争论，只是重申美国证券交易委员会友好的付费ESPN故事，由雄伟的落基山脉以西的每个人设定。当委员会在12月份选择球队时，UW甚至输了。这是一支非常优秀的足球队，他们知道这一点。他们都看着了。不要担心这些人，因为Puppylove在周六晚上接管并发布在Hardcore Husky上，AP会承认UW的努力。他们在这个国家的第9名留下了几个积分，而不是Chris Fetters让他的Dawgman读者相信的前25个积分。
每个人都会失败，但阿拉巴马州，也许是克莱姆森。如果UW负责pac12交易，无论多么具有挑战性，它们都是季后赛的基准。 Fetters似乎表明相反，因为它想通过捏造的争议创建页面浏览量。它无济于事。 Fetters和我回来了很多，Pup总是以他对赫斯基足球和大学橄榄球的无知观点来清理场地。当然，每次我都有不同的意见时，他所要做的就是点击禁令按钮，就像多年来dawgman所做的其他人一样，它产生了HardcoreHusky。September 13 -
-
I went to full site on mobile and found article. Here it is:
"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER.
He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then .
Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-PuppyloveSeptember 6 -
-
-
