How would you define doog?
Comments
-
I've been banging doogs all my life?Dennis_DeYoung said:Doogs are people who instead of wanting greatness, prefer mediocrity because they are unsure greatness is achievable and it hurts them to admit it. They become bitter because they lack confidence in general about the world.
-
Nothing beats academis smack talk.Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant. -
Doog post.Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant.
Doog poaster. -
SHOT DOWN!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doog post.Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant.
Doog poaster. -
But that's just some regional bullshit where we stomp them and proclaim ourselves champions of a state with no other college team besides maybe Eastern.Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant.
This last year was the first in forever where there was actually something riding on the game, at their shit hole, and they were flattened after 10 minutes. Schools can hate each other without there actually being a rivalry.
Oregon is still relevant. They have a really loyal, pathetic fan base that actually shows up to spring games, they've been to the championship twice recently, and they were able to combine talent+system to be elite. The state pride thing is sad but real, which makes it more of a rivalry than Wazzu imo.
But if Taggert really mires that program into 7-8 wins, Petersen will destroy him and it won't be a rivalry anymore. They'll stop caring and turn their money and attention over to Altman.
Hmm, I guess I wasn't making much of a coherent point here, but fuck it Petersen is ushering all of these programs into a gas chamber anyways. -
Using your own definition, who are your top 10 doog posters on this forum? Please exclude those who have HIV, we have suffered enough.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doog post.Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant.
Doog poaster. -
This site's level of doog.
No cure:
Pumpy
Aubbie (who)
Tequilla
Passion
The doogpound transplant
There are a few more I can't think of. Most these types are at the other UW sites. If you thought Sark was growing into a good coach or that Oregon dominated us because they cheated, or you constantly complain about the media not giving UW love... You belong in this group.
The rest of us are all doogs, but a level below. We don't doog all the time, we doog in different ways, but we are doogs.
Then there is guys like Boobs and J. They are hardly even fans. -
IDGAF but since you brought up academic smack, there's nothing "natural" about the rivalry at all on that front. Most rival schools share similar academic rankings/backgrounds. Using ARWU:Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant.
Stanford #2 vs Cal #6
Arizona #104 vs Arizona State #118
Oregon #320 vs #290 Oregon St
USC #29 vs UCLA #12
Duke #25 vs #35 UNC
UW #15 vs WSU #400
-
Academis post, academis posterGladstone said:
IDGAF but since you brought up academic smack, there's nothing "natural" about the rivalry at all on that front. Most rival schools share similar academic rankings/backgrounds. Using ARWU:Dennis_DeYoung said:The Cuogs are OUR? rival because they stand against everything we stand for. Sure, the series is not competitive, but it shouldn't be.
One of the universities is a world-class research uni, in a world-class city with a world-class coach.
The other is a place where you can learn to breed animals in the middle of a cow pie with a guy who looks like an Irish grandmother who has gone from locking people in sheds to coaching in one.
It's one of the most natural rivalries in sport.
,
Who GAF about Oregon? They're not relevant.
Stanford #2 vs Cal #6
Arizona #104 vs Arizona State #118
Oregon #320 vs #290 Oregon St
USC #29 vs UCLA #12
Duke #25 vs #35 UNC
UW #15 vs WSU #400 -
What fucking academic rankings have us* ahead of Duke, UNC and USC?
-
I can't top this.RoadDawg55 said:This site's level of doog.
No cure:
Pumpy
Aubbie (who)
Tequilla
Passion
The doogpound transplant
There are a few more I can't think of. Most these types are at the other UW sites. If you thought Sark was growing into a good coach or that Oregon dominated us because they cheated, or you constantly complain about the media not giving UW love... You belong in this group.
The rest of us are all doogs, but a level below. We don't doog all the time, we doog in different ways, but we are doogs.
Then there is guys like Boobs and J. They are hardly even fans. -
USC still doctors their stats to make themselves look bettar. UNC is a fucking basketball school in the not-too-deep south. Duke has some really strong programs but isn't good across the bored. It's easy to rank UW above them.
-
Far from it ... go read DDY's manifesto ... I agree with every single word of itPostGameOrangeSlices said:Tequilla
-
1) I never thought Sark was growing into a good coach ... the post 2012 pre 2013 comments I made regarding Sark and expectations are what I thought our talent level was at ... if he couldn't hit that level then door.ass.outRoadDawg55 said:This site's level of doog.
No cure:
Pumpy
Aubbie (who)
Tequilla
Passion
The doogpound transplant
There are a few more I can't think of. Most these types are at the other UW sites. If you thought Sark was growing into a good coach or that Oregon dominated us because they cheated, or you constantly complain about the media not giving UW love... You belong in this group.
The rest of us are all doogs, but a level below. We don't doog all the time, we doog in different ways, but we are doogs.
Then there is guys like Boobs and J. They are hardly even fans.
2) I do think Oregon cheated (just like I know that Baylor did) ... but that's never an excuse for why they were better than UW ... they were better because they made the right hires and got the right players and we didn't ... if I've ever been a Doog with Oregon it is that I've long held the opinion that when we are on top of our game we will be the premier NW school (which we are)
3) I don't bitch and whine about media coverage ... in fact I love it when we get slighted as it puts a chip on the shoulder -
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOGTequilla said:
1) I never thought Sark was growing into a good coach ... the post 2012 pre 2013 comments I made regarding Sark and expectations are what I thought our talent level was at ... if he couldn't hit that level then door.ass.outRoadDawg55 said:This site's level of doog.
No cure:
Pumpy
Aubbie (who)
Tequilla
Passion
The doogpound transplant
There are a few more I can't think of. Most these types are at the other UW sites. If you thought Sark was growing into a good coach or that Oregon dominated us because they cheated, or you constantly complain about the media not giving UW love... You belong in this group.
The rest of us are all doogs, but a level below. We don't doog all the time, we doog in different ways, but we are doogs.
Then there is guys like Boobs and J. They are hardly even fans.
2) I do think Oregon cheated (just like I know that Baylor did) ... but that's never an excuse for why they were better than UW ... they were better because they made the right hires and got the right players and we didn't ... if I've ever been a Doog with Oregon it is that I've long held the opinion that when we are on top of our game we will be the premier NW school (which we are)
3) I don't bitch and whine about media coverage ... in fact I love it when we get slighted as it puts a chip on the shoulder
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG DOOG
kutomba mbali
-
A Doog/Quook is anyone that says something along the lines of "This shows you how good of a job Coach X is doing and recruits better jump on fast or they will lose their spot!" after one good commit verbals.
Smart people realize that if you have to get overly excites about recruiting then your coach is either brand new or not very good.
I don't remember following recruiting at all when Chip was the head coach. He would sign 25 kids and develop them. -
I want UO to lose every fucking game they play.
doogflea
-
So a Quook isn't just an Oregonization of Doog or Cuog?
-
That's exactly what Quook is.BaldwinIV said:So a Quook isn't just an Oregonization of Doog or Cuog?
Here's the full list for the conference:
Doog
Coog
Quook
Boov
Boor
Cardinool (this one sucks)
Broon
Trooj
Sun Doovil
Woldcoot
Boof
Oote -
If you were the first person to ever post this, you are a miserable and pathetic Doog for life:
You want to take the gloves off Race? You want to get down in a pissing match? Let’s do it. Let’s roll.
I’m getting completely fed up with your hate, negativity, and throwing people under the bus.
Quite frankly Race, I’m very, VERY happy that I don’t know you. I’m quite happy that I don’t lead what appears to be such a pathetic life that is faced with looking for the negativity in every situation. You need to go find something to smile at. Last I checked, it’s summertime. The weather in Seattle seems to be pretty damn good right now – why don’t you go check that out.
You are pretty damn wrong about things. You may think that the amount of time that you keep spewing your views that that you’ve now heard it enough times that you are right. Doesn’t make you right.
You talk about 12-47 like that happened out of the blue sky. I’ve never seen you once suggest that the process of the downfall of this program began well before Emmert arrived.
You want facts? You want truth? Here’s your truth.
Emmert came to the UW prior to the GLORIOUS 1-10 season under Gilby. The year before that (2003) Gilby managed to do enough to get us to 6-6, but that included the debacle at Cal where we gave up 700 yards (or thereabouts). It was an indifferent team that pretty much was at best mediocre. We lost 5 of our last 8, including the blowout to Cal, the blowout to UCLA, and a home loss to NEVADA. Yep, the program was heading in the right direction.
The 2002 season under Slick was another sterling season example that is most remembered for the “Northwest Championship.” That was great. But it hid the fact that going into the “Northwest Championship” we were a 4-5 football team that was pretty much a joke at 1-4 in the conference. In both 2002 and 2003, we finished the season with a 4-4 conference record.
These weren’t good football teams. The trend was heading downhill.
Emmert comes on board and immediately gets sadled with the Gilby 1-10 debacle.
Prior to Emmert coming on board, Babs jumps ship after a decade of mis-management, including allowing the stadium to begin the erosion process.
Throughout 2003, we’re faced with Slick leaving and the subsequent lawsuit(s), Dr. Feelgood, and a whole mess with the softball program and Teresa Wilson.
Now keep in mind the following: ALL THIS HAPPENED BEFORE EMMERT WAS ANYWHERE NEAR BEING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON.
Things were not in great shape. I think just about everybody knew that.
A search committee is formed to replace Babs. The BOR, upper campus, and the big donor supporters of the school are sick of the egg showing up on their face. They are sick of the country club that Babs ran and the loose way she ran the department – particularly in light of what went on with Slick. They wanted someone prim, proper, and who they could count on would not sully the University name. ENTER TODD TURNER.
Now, this pretty much gets you up to the point where Emmert was hired. Did he have to sign off on the hiring of Turner? Most likely. But whatever.
At this point, Emmert isn’t responsible for the on-field performance of the football program. There is a coach in place. It’s not Emmert’s job to oversee the football program or any other program in the athletic department. That job belongs to Todd Turner. It’s Emmert’s job to monitor the job performance of Todd Turner.
So 1-10 happens. Gilby is canned by Turner (rightfully so). Yes, the program went 1-10. But the actions of those charged with overseeing the program were correct. Turner fired the coach for poor performance. If I’m in Emmert’s shoes, I can’t complain.
Coaching search takes place and Turner has his heart set on Tyrone Willingham. It’s Turner’s hire. It’s not Emmert’s hire. Surely Emmert had to sign off on the hire. That’s fine. You want to throw some blame on him for not having the foresight to negate the hire. That’s fine. But the hire isn’t Emmert’s responsibility. It’s Turner’s responsibility. It’s Emmert’s responsibility to hold Turner accountable for the hire (which he did 3 years later when it was obvious that Tyrone wasn’t the answer).
So Tyrone goes 2-9 the first year after a 1-10 year. Not great. Warning signs start going off, particularly with some poor performance to close games. But it’s the first year of the regime and really hard to get too critical.
The next year the program goes 5-7 and has 2 significant events. The first significant event is the loss of the QB to injury. I think many could argue that without the loss of Isaiah that year, we go 6-6. The second event that was significant was the “suddenly senior” day and the unexplicable loss to Stanford with the most emotionless football team anybody had ever seen. Again, there’s not enough there to fire Tyrone at that point. There are warning signs. There is ground to pretty much tell Tyrone that the following year is an action year where something needs to happen. He’s on a short leash at this point in my opinion.
The following year we lose games in ways that are unexplainable. Blow a huge loss to Arizona – a game we should have never lost. The most ridiculous ending to an Apple Cup I’ve ever seen where a guy was open by 20 yards coming out of a timeout. Blowing a pair of 21 point leads to Hawai’i. It was pretty obvious at this point that things weren’t working. Coaching change was in order. Perhaps an AD change was also in order. The coaching change was blocked and complicated. The AD’s head fell – and rightfully so due to some other issues that he had and such a terrible hire of a head coach.
Prior to the decision to fire Tyrone after 2007, it’s really hard to argue with ANYTHING that Emmert had done with respect to the football program.
I will say that bringing Tyrone back for 2008 was a disasterous mistake. It should have never happened. You want to throw 0-12 on Emmert – I’m all for it. I think if you caught Emmert in a reflective, truthful moment, he would tell you in hindsight that he should have made the move and that it wasn’t worth the carnage of 0-12.
Throw Emmert under the bus for 2008. That’s his responsibility. 2004-2007? Not so much. By all means, please, please tell me where he has responsibility for 2004 and 2007 other than the fact that he’s the University President. Please tell me what specific actions that he did to undermine the program. You aren’t going to find them – they aren’t there.
Your criticism of Emmert is ridiculous. Your criticism of Woodward is just downright comical.
Where has Woodward screwed this program? He has only been responsible for this program in the summer of 2008 in a full-time role. Are you going to hold him to the fire for being the interim AD for the first half of 2008? How is he responsible for anything from 2004-2007 when he wasn’t even involved with the Athletic Department? Talk about conspiracy theories. This may be one of the greatest conspiracy theories I’ve ever seen.
I don’t like losing. I don’t like what I’ve seen the last 5 years. It’s made me sick to my stomach many times over. But unlike you, I can at least take a step back and realize that the genesis of this problem began well before Mark Emmert became President of the University of Washington.
If I spent my time being a “mindless Race Bannon minion,” then I’d be convinced that the only logical explanation for our failures have been Mark Emmert and Scott Woodward.
Quite frankly, that opinion is one of the most idiotic insanely stupid opinions that I’ve ever seen in my life.
I don’t defend the “wrong targets.” There is blame to be thrown Emmert’s way. I readily acknowledge that. But it isn’t his full blame. Babs deserves blame. Gerberding deserves blame. McCormick deserves some blame. Slick deserves some blame. Gilby deserves some blame. Turner deserves some blame. Tyrone deserves some blame. Of the names I’ve listed, only 3 of those names have any timeline that extends into any portion of Emmert’s tenure. That’s less than half of those names.
Quite frankly Race, you are a world class donkey. When I hear people bitch and moan about the people in the State of Washington – you are a crystal example of why people bitch about the State of Washington. When I hear people that bitch about the fans of the University of Washington and what their complaints are, you represent what those complaints are.
In my opinion, you are not good for the University of Washington. You aren’t helping the program. You aren’t helping the University. You are entirely self-serving and a pompous, egotistical jerk.
You are barking up the wrong tree if you are going after me. I’m not naive enough to shove my head so far up my arse to ignore what I am seeing. I don’t think that there is anybody that knows me that would say that I wouldn’t call a spade a spade.
All that paying for and attending games longer than I’ve been alive has done for you is given you a perceived ability to go be a bitter old man. Congrats on that.
Thanks for showing those of us in a younger generation how not to act in 20-30 years when we are in your shoes. -
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ("doog"), and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.
-
Grundle too lowRoadDawg55 said:This site's level of doog.
No cure:
Pumpy
Aubbie (who)
Tequilla
Passion
The doogpound transplant
There are a few more I can't think of. Most these types are at the other UW sites. If you thought Sark was growing into a good coach or that Oregon dominated us because they cheated, or you constantly complain about the media not giving UW love... You belong in this group.
The rest of us are all doogs, but a level below. We don't doog all the time, we doog in different ways, but we are doogs.
Then there is guys like Boobs and J. They are hardly even fans. -
Tequilla said:
Far from it ... go read DDY's manifesto ... I agree with every single word of itPostGameOrangeSlices said:Tequilla
Doog -
Anyone who says USC is their rival and anyone who points with their arm at a faggy 45° angle
-
We? so deserved it89ute said:Anyone who says USC is their rival and anyone who points with their arm at a faggy 45° angle
-
Why are there Ducks fans at the Cal/UW game?89ute said:Anyone who says USC is their rival and anyone who points with their arm at a faggy 45° angle
-
Part of why we deserved it. At least Helfrich was savvy enough to disguise us? as Cal for the ass whippingBennyBeaver said:
Why are there Ducks fans at the Cal/UW game?89ute said:Anyone who says USC is their rival and anyone who points with their arm at a faggy 45° angle
-
PurpleJ said:
USC doesn't give a shit about us. Their rivals are Notre Dame and the other schools in Cali.haie said:Oregon is our NW rival. The hate is there on both sides. Both programs have had success.
WSU is not a rival. They suck ass. Then they make claims about how Oregon has dominated us to refute this point, as if it's even close to the same situation. Aggy schools are just happy to be Power 5. They are no ones rival.
SC is our true rival, and really the rival of the entire conference. I don't care if the feeling is mutual or not. They are the team you want to beat 17-12 in their own empty stadium.
WSU, as stated is a total joke and only counts as a rival because they are in Washington.
Oregon is our main rival. Neither fan base likes the other. The series is competitive. The biggest doogs here are the ones who are so threatened by Oregon that they can't admit to being their rival.
Who is threatened by Oregon now?PurpleJ said:
USC doesn't give a shit about us. Their rivals are Notre Dame and the other schools in Cali.haie said:Oregon is our NW rival. The hate is there on both sides. Both programs have had success.
WSU is not a rival. They suck ass. Then they make claims about how Oregon has dominated us to refute this point, as if it's even close to the same situation. Aggy schools are just happy to be Power 5. They are no ones rival.
SC is our true rival, and really the rival of the entire conference. I don't care if the feeling is mutual or not. They are the team you want to beat 17-12 in their own empty stadium.
WSU, as stated is a total joke and only counts as a rival because they are in Washington.
Oregon is our main rival. Neither fan base likes the other. The series is competitive. The biggest doogs here are the ones who are so threatened by Oregon that they can't admit to being their rival.
Maybe win they start winning again. -
Im going to be an aztooc
-
The best definition of any Doog, Quook or Cuog is that if you read their poasts out loud it sounds like this:
