Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
SC is the benchmark. Oregon and Stanford had their little runs, but SC is usually at least a 7 or 8 win team they rarely go more than five years without at least tying for a title. I've never thought of them as a big rival, but it's usually an accomplishment to beat them. If nothing else, you're beating what's usually a more talented group.
Beating Oregon just feels like something you ought to be able to do most years. That makes the yuge losing streak to them all the more pathetic.
Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate peoplewho bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
Doog is basically a term used these days if you have an opinion about UW football and someone else does not agree with that opinion. We can all thank more cock for that one.
Doog is basically a term used these days if you have an opinion about UW football and someone else does not agree with that opinion. We can all thank more cock for that one.
yeah ppl close their eyes and shout it at anyone they disagree with. the term has been bastardized.
SC is the benchmark. Oregon and Stanford had their little runs, but SC is usually at least a 7 or 8 win team they rarely go more than five years without at least tying for a title. I've never thought of them as a big rival, but it's usually an accomplishment to beat them. If nothing else, you're beating what's usually a more talented group.
Beating Oregon just feels like something you ought to be able to do most years. That makes the yuge losing streak to them all the more pathetic.
coaching is everything
belloti (chip as OC) chip helfrich (with MM at QB)
vs
Gilby Ty Sark
Now that it's Petersen vs Helfrich/Black Sark/Cristobal the shoe is on the other foot. SHOCKER
I would define Doog to include, without limitation, anyone who talks like this:
Well, say no more...U are an adopted DAWG!
We think of our family as a very TIGHT, CLOSE group. So, you know, you need to prove your loyalty. We already know you are intelligent, but what we really want to see on the DAWG side is you being able to sing "Bow Down to Washington." Chosen as one of the top fight songs in college football.
Looking forward to adding more Dawgs to our huge Husky Nation. It'S ALL about the DAWG life!
Welcome to the Dawg family. Now, here is your homework. Learn the words to "Bow Down to Washington." Here is a link to the song and words.
There are other varieties, but the Doog Legend is a fella named krisvashon, and she knows no equal.
Comments
Sad!
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
But I like your spunk.
Beating Oregon just feels like something you ought to be able to do most years. That makes the yuge losing streak to them all the more pathetic.
belloti (chip as OC)
chip
helfrich (with MM at QB)
vs
Gilby
Ty
Sark
Now that it's Petersen vs Helfrich/Black Sark/Cristobal the shoe is on the other foot. SHOCKER
Well, say no more...U are an adopted DAWG!
We think of our family as a very TIGHT, CLOSE group. So, you know, you need to prove your loyalty. We already know you are intelligent, but what we really want to see on the DAWG side is you being able to sing "Bow Down to Washington." Chosen as one of the top fight songs in college football.
Looking forward to adding more Dawgs to our huge Husky Nation. It'S ALL about the DAWG life!
Welcome to the Dawg family. Now, here is your homework. Learn the words to "Bow Down to Washington." Here is a link to the song and words.
There are other varieties, but the Doog Legend is a fella named krisvashon, and she knows no equal.