How would you define doog?
Comments
-
Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
-
How many natties did you win during your period of dominance?oregonblitzkrieg said:Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
-
They don't get a free pass just because Cheat Carroll and his paid players won the previous decade. Show me what you've done lately or GTFO. And yes, playoff appearances are greater than Rose Bowels that don't matter anymore.
-
Cheat Carroll ROFL!
Auburn cucked the shit outta you. -
If we're talking about who got cucked up more, compare:PurpleJ said:Cheat Carroll ROFL!
Auburn cucked the shit outta you.
22-19 in the natty vs the SEC
vs
24-7 in the playoffs vs the SEC
-
Quooks gonna quook. Perfect thread for it.
-
Pointing out the fact that USC doesn't currently deserve to be considered the standard of the conference isn't quooking. It's just reality. I would even concede that UW is the current standard until they get knocked off. A team that got gang raped 52 to 6 by the same Alabama team that you lost to 24-7 is NOT the standard. HTH.PurpleJ said:Quooks gonna quook. Perfect thread for it.
-
Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
Saying 22-19 is getting the shit cucked out of you is top quality dooging.PurpleJ said:Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
70oregonblitzkrieg said:
Saying 22-19 is getting the shit cucked out of you is top quality dooging.PurpleJ said:Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
12-1PurpleJ said:
70oregonblitzkrieg said:
Saying 22-19 is getting the shit cucked out of you is top quality dooging.PurpleJ said:Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
Lol no nattyoregonblitzkrieg said:
12-1PurpleJ said:
70oregonblitzkrieg said:
Saying 22-19 is getting the shit cucked out of you is top quality dooging.PurpleJ said:Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
At least you can hang your power ranger helmet on that cherished voted half natty while Puppy sinks the weenie in your discipline hole.
-
Maybe. Or maybe without John Ross terrifying defenses they'll load the box and sit on short throws, exposing Browning further.
-
They don't give out trophies for half natties.oregonblitzkrieg said:At least you can hang your power ranger helmet on that cherished voted half natty while Puppy sinks the weenie in your discipline hole.
-
The U disagrees.PurpleJ said:
They don't give out trophies for half natties.oregonblitzkrieg said:At least you can hang your power ranger helmet on that cherished voted half natty while Puppy sinks the weenie in your discipline hole.
-
Did they get a trophy?oregonblitzkrieg said:
The U disagrees.PurpleJ said:
They don't give out trophies for half natties.oregonblitzkrieg said:At least you can hang your power ranger helmet on that cherished voted half natty while Puppy sinks the weenie in your discipline hole.
@creepycoug true??!
-
21PurpleJ said:
70oregonblitzkrieg said:
Saying 22-19 is getting the shit cucked out of you is top quality dooging.PurpleJ said:Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
Popping off about 70 is fun, but I really wish we would have missed an extra point.
deadspin.com/rob-gronkowski-once-tanked-a-free-throw-to-keep-his-hig-1791836453 -
59-45oregonblitzkrieg said:
12-1PurpleJ said:
70oregonblitzkrieg said:
Saying 22-19 is getting the shit cucked out of you is top quality dooging.PurpleJ said:Bragging about losing better is top quality quooking.
-
Doog vs quook.
Sad! -
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.oregonblitzkrieg said:Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
But I like your spunk. -
Fuck you!! Don't fuck with my Washington Huskies!! Now I'm 100% doogin
-
Nice.PurpleJ said:Popping off about 70 is fun, but I really wish we would have missed an extra point.
deadspin.com/rob-gronkowski-once-tanked-a-free-throw-to-keep-his-hig-1791836453 -
Take this to the spunk bored!creepycoug said:
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.oregonblitzkrieg said:Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
But I like your spunk. -
He never ponied up the doughCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Take this to the spunk bored!creepycoug said:
A most confounding poast my good man. Here here.oregonblitzkrieg said:Lots of cucks in here for a school like USC. UW's problem is they never will see themselves as USC's better or equal. When Oregon was on a roll we? didn't give a FUCK about all their phony pageantry, their pre-BCS voted natties and the legions of cucks that pencil them in automatically every year as the standard of the conference. Oregon shit down their leg like they were trash and made UW slurp up the butt gravy ° (copyrighted by salemcoog). Fact is Oregon and Stanford have been the standard of the conference until recently, not USC. Until USC makes the playoffs and prove themselves in the current decade, they take a backseat to the teams that have.
On the one hand, you hit on something that has always bugged me about Husky fandom ... not just the doogs, which I agree is a term that has lost meaning and is now just a general pajorative in the hands of the average poaster. It is this enthusiastic acceptance of being in second place to USC and taking so much pride in how much "USC really respects us" that I find pathetic. I like the rebellious disdain for royalty. I hate people who bow.
I would have more respect for bitterness and begrudging credit where it's due ... to acknowledge the facts, but not embrace it so gladly and man crush so much on one's superior. Be pissed. Hate on 'em some. Accuse them of cheating (sound familiar?) ... do something for Jake's sake. This posture UW has relative to USC is effeminate. So you're spot on there and you should have about 100WTFs by now because it taps into the deepes insecurities of the best of 'em here. See, e.g., @southerndawg's infinitely ghey retort to me how USC trumps my Canes on cfb historical significance. He actually props up SC to hurt me ... so unmanly.
On the other hand, discussing any team in this conference as the standard for a truncated period of time is quooky/doogy. Oregon had a nice run; stipulated. Natty or no natty is whatever. UW has one and made up one or two others. Super.
But over time, in this confrunce, it is SC ... Seconds place or temporary substitutes are rather insignificant.
But I like your spunk. -
-
SC is the benchmark. Oregon and Stanford had their little runs, but SC is usually at least a 7 or 8 win team they rarely go more than five years without at least tying for a title. I've never thought of them as a big rival, but it's usually an accomplishment to beat them. If nothing else, you're beating what's usually a more talented group.Pitchfork51 said:Sc cares about notre Dame and UCLA.
Beating Oregon just feels like something you ought to be able to do most years. That makes the yuge losing streak to them all the more pathetic. -
-
Doog = "new coach is just like Don James!"
