Study Suggests Oregon is Doomed for a Downturn with Helfrich
Comments
-
There are surplus tee shirts in the Dominican Republic that say as much even today.RaceBannon said:
I was trying to explain that to the coog the other day. Some people think its all Mariota. It isn't. He may be the best but its the system. Didn't Thomas go 12-0 (1)?Canard said:
My thinking is that if we won the league with Masoli and Thomas for fuck's sake, we just need competence out of the QB to be highly competitive with the returning skill players we possess.haie said:Oregon isn't going anywhere lower than a 10-11 win team, and when UW finally beats them it will be as pathetic and doogerific as 'The Pick', if not more.
That being said, if Oregon fan thinks they're just going to hand it to Freeman next year to coast through the league again, they are just as FS. -
Btw, my favorite part of this piece of doog analysis was the conclusion.
The study argues that Helfrich could maintain Oregon’s elite status for two more seasons but suggests major regression thereafter. If Chris Petersen is who we think he is then he will have our huskies rebuilt and ready to contend right at the time when Helfrich and Oregon will begin their regression.
That was especially poignant given that the only real metric that is holding firm here these days is that 100% of the doog predictions based upon the assumptions concerning who Peenerman is have been, how is it said? Oh yeah, totally fucking wrong.
Perhaps someone here should probe that mass delusion. -
There is room for advanced statistics in sports.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Stanford was #1 in SRS in 2010. Switzer was #1 in SRS the year after he won the NC so thats why his is a 2s. Butch Davis has 1s because Miami was #1 SRS in 2000.dtd said:What is the "1s" in the National Championship column next to Harbaugh?
I like using them in baseball because you can use the large sample size to accurately determine how good the teams really were (going beyond pure wins, losses)
But I don't hand out WS titles based on which team had the highest team WAR, and that is baseball, this is college fucking football where the teams play 4-5 good teams and a bunch of dreck each season.
Saying Harbaugh won a NC because his team finished #1 in SRS is stupid
If Stanford were the "true national champions" that year why were they plungered by Oregon?
-
Comparing Helfrich to Coker only invites comparisons between Peterman and Hawkins/Koetter. They're both fucking stupid, jealous, wishful thinking by rivals.
-
In both cases, LIFPOdtd said:Comparing Helfrich to Coker only invites comparisons between Peterman and Hawkins/Koetter. They're both fucking stupid, jealous, wishful thinking by rivals.
-
You're a dipshit. A good Stanford program is good for the PAC 12. Get your fucking ass over to the ACC if you want to play shitty teams all season long.Canard said:
If you cannot see that both the UO, and especially the UW, fan bases wouldn't mind a neutered Stanford going forward, well, there's just no helping you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
So are you.Canard said:
You're a dipshit.oregonblitzkrieg said:There's no reason to kiss this guy's ass. Harbaugh didn't have anything to sustain. He didn't even win the PAC 12. He ran off to the NFL like a punk motherfucker before he won anything of note. And now he's fled from the NFL before winning anything of note while turning his team into a stinking mess. Currently he's raiding his former school like a punk mother fucker. Hurting the Stanford program will hurt the PAC 12. Fuck him.
-
You really should be thinking about putting a diaphragm in your pussy with all the plungering you've be subjected to on this bored.Canard said:
Who has been having a tantrum in this thread? Looks like it is you.bananasnblondes said:This article does a great job of proving one thing. The minute anyone talks slightly negatively about Oregon, it's fans go into pissy little faggot tantrums.
Let's be honest, this site is an alternative to the humorless drivel on places like dawgman. A lot of what is posted here is self depreciating towards the team this site is named after and a lot is tongue-in-cheek. There are some duck fans here that contribute to such discussions and give the huskies a good natured ribbing as well. However, as AZDuck has demonstrated in this post, they get all serious and turn into 12-level pussy mouthbreathers the minute anything negative is slightly suggested about the Ducks.
Tell you what, the next time I am feeling uppity, I'll wear a condom with the appropriate ribbing for your pleasure and you can keep your tongue in your cheek for it, okay? -
Harbog worshipers will do anything to prop this clown up. It's fucking hilarious how he's included in the same sentences as the USC shyster and Kelly. Which out of these 3 doesn't belong? HARBAUGH: 0 PAC 12 CHAMPIONSHIPS. 0 NCG APPEARANCES OR WINS.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Stanford was #1 in SRS in 2010. Switzer was #1 in SRS the year after he won the NC so thats why his is a 2s. Butch Davis has 1s because Miami was #1 SRS in 2000.dtd said:What is the "1s" in the National Championship column next to Harbaugh?
-
You're such a dumb ass. The North is a zero sum game. We only need TWO good programs within the division and one of them does not need be embarrassingly boring Stanford and their tens of fans. As much grief as I give those cocksuckers from Montlake, at least they have passion. Stanford isn't a gate draw, or a television draw, or anything else that matters since your "fraud" left.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're a dipshit. A good Stanford program is good for the PAC 12. Get your fucking ass over to the ACC if you want to play shitty teams all season long.Canard said:
If you cannot see that both the UO, and especially the UW, fan bases wouldn't mind a neutered Stanford going forward, well, there's just no helping you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
So are you.Canard said:
You're a dipshit.oregonblitzkrieg said:There's no reason to kiss this guy's ass. Harbaugh didn't have anything to sustain. He didn't even win the PAC 12. He ran off to the NFL like a punk motherfucker before he won anything of note. And now he's fled from the NFL before winning anything of note while turning his team into a stinking mess. Currently he's raiding his former school like a punk mother fucker. Hurting the Stanford program will hurt the PAC 12. Fuck him.
It's far more important "for the conference" that at least one of the two LA programs quit fucking around with shitty coaches.
The CCG can't keep being a perennial north rapes south and stomps the corpse type game if it is going to keep mattering. -
You need to quit being self-referential and then projecting your inadequacies outward.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You really should be thinking about putting a diaphragm in your pussy with all the plungering you've be subjected to on this bored.Canard said:
Who has been having a tantrum in this thread? Looks like it is you.bananasnblondes said:This article does a great job of proving one thing. The minute anyone talks slightly negatively about Oregon, it's fans go into pissy little faggot tantrums.
Let's be honest, this site is an alternative to the humorless drivel on places like dawgman. A lot of what is posted here is self depreciating towards the team this site is named after and a lot is tongue-in-cheek. There are some duck fans here that contribute to such discussions and give the huskies a good natured ribbing as well. However, as AZDuck has demonstrated in this post, they get all serious and turn into 12-level pussy mouthbreathers the minute anything negative is slightly suggested about the Ducks.
Tell you what, the next time I am feeling uppity, I'll wear a condom with the appropriate ribbing for your pleasure and you can keep your tongue in your cheek for it, okay?
