Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Yellow says "the defense will be fine" next year...

13468919

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,048 Founders Club
    I'm not German by the way
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    So let's see here .. YellowSnow is a snot-nosed twentysomething and Race Bannon is leading around a mob of Antifa followers. Anything else I should know about any other posters?

    Pup called me a gay man once.
    Did he follow that up with a fancy feast?
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 6,128
    So just to get this straight...

    When we have 4 year JAGs playing its not good because raw ralent is the only thing that matters

    also

    When we will have new talented players in we are hopepless because you need reps and experience to be good?
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,650 Founders Club
    Canadawg said:

    So just to get this straight...

    When we have 4 year JAGs playing its not good because raw ralent is the only thing that matters

    also

    When we will have new talented players in we are hopepless because you need reps and experience to be good?

    They aren't mutually exclusive ideas. The secondary this year is how you want EVERY position group to look almost every year. Experienced, talented starters with lots of talent behind them chopping at the bit to get reps.

    To channel DDY, Talent matters, experience/development matters, EVERYTHING MATTERS!
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited January 2019

    89ute said:

    There will be a dropoff on defense.

    It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.

    Maybe... Maybe not.
    Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.

    If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))

    Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
    Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.

    If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
    Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17
    chuck said:

    Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.

    The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.

    The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.

    Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.

    Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.

    What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.

    Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691

    89ute said:

    There will be a dropoff on defense.

    It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.

    Maybe... Maybe not.
    Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.

    If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))

    Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
    Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.

    If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
    Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17
    chuck said:

    Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.

    The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.

    The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.

    Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.

    Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.

    What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC for besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.

    Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year.
    Always next year with you