Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Yellow says "the defense will be fine" next year...
Comments
-
Bring something football related bitchfork, something quality to converse with Pup. You're basically the new baabs. Posts...no substance. We saw what happened to him. Just another notch in pups belt...along with cockus, J, damone...how many others? You'll be on dawgman free board, hh with your 5th different handle b4 long. Tread lightly pitch, the quicksand is up to your cunt already..maybe the silicone will keep your chest up for awhile...but dont count on it
-
Nobody is ready to start until they start, I suppose.puppylove_sugarsteel said:DerekJohnson said:
Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.89ute said:
Maybe... Maybe not.HillsboroDuck said:There will be a dropoff on defense.
It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.
If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))
Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.chuck said:Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.
The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.
The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.
Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.
What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.
Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
What's this shit about Bama? Were they part of this thread?
I didn't use anything "against" you good buddy. I'm here for you. In this case I helped you out by refuting your labeling of the secondary as "new fish". They are not. There are a shit ton of snaps coming back and the overall speed, size, and athleticism of the secondary will be improved NIT due to the two guys you put forth as being the saviors (two slot corners). -
I've already stated my belief in molden, bryant. Ive stated my opinion about good young players like McKinney and KT. And my liking of Hampton. Pup and only Pup hyped him since I watched his film (said he'd be a gamer, like I did Peter's b4 any fucking body).chuck said:
Nobody is ready to start until they start, I suppose.puppylove_sugarsteel said:DerekJohnson said:
Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.89ute said:
Maybe... Maybe not.HillsboroDuck said:There will be a dropoff on defense.
It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.
If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))
Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.chuck said:Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.
The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.
The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.
Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.
What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.
Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
What's this shit about Bama? Were they part of this thread?
I didn't use anything "against" you good buddy. I'm here for you. In this case I helped you out by refuting your labeling of the secondary as "new fish". They are not. There are a shit ton of snaps coming back and the overall speed, size, and athleticism of the secondary will be improved NIT due to the two guys you put forth as being the saviors (two slot corners).
Now none of you know shit about Irvin or Gordon as they only played special teams In any meaningful minutes. So STFU b4 they produce, any of these guys besides KT and lesser extent McKinney produce. Could they be great? Sure, but bama fans just assumed they'd "reload " at db this year...they didnt. tOSU fans on bucknuts thought their frosh-soph db's would reload...they gave up big plays ALL FUCKING YEAR until Michigan game
Youd have to actually watch cfb to understand. Try it next year b4 you assume Jimmy Lake will roll out 4 AA's out the gates next year...fuck odear -
Trevor Lawarence would shred any college defense in America right now. Dude might win the Heisman 2 years in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I've already stated my belief in molden, bryant. Ive stated my opinion about good young players like McKinney and KT. And my liking of Hampton. Pup and only Pup hyped him since I watched his film (said he'd be a gamer, like I did Peter's b4 any fucking body).chuck said:
Nobody is ready to start until they start, I suppose.puppylove_sugarsteel said:DerekJohnson said:
Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.89ute said:
Maybe... Maybe not.HillsboroDuck said:There will be a dropoff on defense.
It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.
If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))
Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.chuck said:Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.
The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.
The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.
Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.
What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.
Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
What's this shit about Bama? Were they part of this thread?
I didn't use anything "against" you good buddy. I'm here for you. In this case I helped you out by refuting your labeling of the secondary as "new fish". They are not. There are a shit ton of snaps coming back and the overall speed, size, and athleticism of the secondary will be improved NIT due to the two guys you put forth as being the saviors (two slot corners).
Now none of you know shit about Irvin or Gordon as they only played special teams In any meaningful minutes. So STFU b4 they produce, any of these guys besides KT and lesser extent McKinney produce. Could they be great? Sure, but bama fans just assumed they'd "reload " at db this year...they didnt. tOSU fans on bucknuts thought their frosh-soph db's would reload...they gave up big plays ALL FUCKING YEAR until Michigan game
Youd have to actually watch cfb to understand. Try it next year b4 you assume Jimmy Lake will roll out 4 AA's out the gates next year...fuck odear -
Everyone was on the Dom Hampton train since the first game of senior year you stupid fuck.
Jesus you really are starting to turn into Mike Franchesa. -
You mean in the only 3 "good" teams he played this year?YellowSnow said:
Trevor Lawarence would shred any college defense in America right now. Dude might win the Heisman 2 years in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I've already stated my belief in molden, bryant. Ive stated my opinion about good young players like McKinney and KT. And my liking of Hampton. Pup and only Pup hyped him since I watched his film (said he'd be a gamer, like I did Peter's b4 any fucking body).chuck said:
Nobody is ready to start until they start, I suppose.puppylove_sugarsteel said:DerekJohnson said:
Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.89ute said:
Maybe... Maybe not.HillsboroDuck said:There will be a dropoff on defense.
It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.
If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))
Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.chuck said:Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.
The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.
The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.
Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.
What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.
Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
What's this shit about Bama? Were they part of this thread?
I didn't use anything "against" you good buddy. I'm here for you. In this case I helped you out by refuting your labeling of the secondary as "new fish". They are not. There are a shit ton of snaps coming back and the overall speed, size, and athleticism of the secondary will be improved NIT due to the two guys you put forth as being the saviors (two slot corners).
Now none of you know shit about Irvin or Gordon as they only played special teams In any meaningful minutes. So STFU b4 they produce, any of these guys besides KT and lesser extent McKinney produce. Could they be great? Sure, but bama fans just assumed they'd "reload " at db this year...they didnt. tOSU fans on bucknuts thought their frosh-soph db's would reload...they gave up big plays ALL FUCKING YEAR until Michigan game
Youd have to actually watch cfb to understand. Try it next year b4 you assume Jimmy Lake will roll out 4 AA's out the gates next year...fuck odear
How about the NFL'S best corners who shut down hall of fame qb's every Sunday dipshit? Good corners take away "Trevor Lawrence" all the fucking time yellobelly. Bama, ND had very average corners, safeties. What a lousy fucking argument -
Dawg Bama has 2 first rounders at the back end.
Deionte Thompson projected 1st round pick,
Surtain true freshmen will be a 1st rounder
Saivion Smith will be a day 2 pick.
You are fucking dumb jesus
-
Listen numb nuts, i didn’t say anything about NFL corners. I said, he would have shredded any COLLEGE Defense in that Natty game. If you claim to have lived the Hemingway lifestyle Pup, then reading comprehension matters. Ernest was the GOAT at both reading AND writing.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You mean in the only 3 "good" teams he played this year?YellowSnow said:
Trevor Lawarence would shred any college defense in America right now. Dude might win the Heisman 2 years in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I've already stated my belief in molden, bryant. Ive stated my opinion about good young players like McKinney and KT. And my liking of Hampton. Pup and only Pup hyped him since I watched his film (said he'd be a gamer, like I did Peter's b4 any fucking body).chuck said:
Nobody is ready to start until they start, I suppose.puppylove_sugarsteel said:DerekJohnson said:
Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.89ute said:
Maybe... Maybe not.HillsboroDuck said:There will be a dropoff on defense.
It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.
If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))
Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.chuck said:Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.
The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.
The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.
Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.
What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.
Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
What's this shit about Bama? Were they part of this thread?
I didn't use anything "against" you good buddy. I'm here for you. In this case I helped you out by refuting your labeling of the secondary as "new fish". They are not. There are a shit ton of snaps coming back and the overall speed, size, and athleticism of the secondary will be improved NIT due to the two guys you put forth as being the saviors (two slot corners).
Now none of you know shit about Irvin or Gordon as they only played special teams In any meaningful minutes. So STFU b4 they produce, any of these guys besides KT and lesser extent McKinney produce. Could they be great? Sure, but bama fans just assumed they'd "reload " at db this year...they didnt. tOSU fans on bucknuts thought their frosh-soph db's would reload...they gave up big plays ALL FUCKING YEAR until Michigan game
Youd have to actually watch cfb to understand. Try it next year b4 you assume Jimmy Lake will roll out 4 AA's out the gates next year...fuck odear
How about the NFL'S best corners who shut down hall of fame qb's every Sunday dipshit? Good corners take away "Trevor Lawrence" all the fucking time yellobelly. Bama, ND had very average corners, safeties. What a lousy fucking argument -
Did you think Murphy would be good, even dominant, after a year on the scout team? What that guys got was better than that. They're bigger, faster dudes than Murphy (just what I see in their Hudls). They, like Murphy in 2017, have a year working under a DB coach that keeps cranking out guys who outperform expectations.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I've already stated my belief in molden, bryant. Ive stated my opinion about good young players like McKinney and KT. And my liking of Hampton. Pup and only Pup hyped him since I watched his film (said he'd be a gamer, like I did Peter's b4 any fucking body).chuck said:
Nobody is ready to start until they start, I suppose.puppylove_sugarsteel said:DerekJohnson said:
Great! Another trip the Rose Bowl where this time we lose to Michigan State 34-17Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our schedule is shit. By the time we play anyone good, people will be broken in. We probably will play freshmen tho.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree. Oregon , Utah will have best d in conference. You dont lose 7-8 starters in any era, any program. Bama, tOSU is proof of that this year. Even with top -3 classes every year, experience matters, always has.89ute said:
Maybe... Maybe not.HillsboroDuck said:There will be a dropoff on defense.
It will still be the best defense in the Pac12.
If u have a good d line, backers coming back it will afford time for your db's to get used to the game. If you have Scrempo's and John Clark coming back as reliable depth, unproven 330lb RS frosh tubbolards inside and expect a pass rush, run stoppage...it takes reps, time. Meanwhile your 4 new starters at db are ficked... all I can say is thank God Molden and Bryant are back. Theyll help lead new fish along. Gilchrist's lack of development concerning. I was counting on him (another Eastside kid who never lives up to billing like Roberts...pup been warning of offering Eastside kids for 25 years...for every 1 Bud Baker there are 5 izbick's))
Dr. J is my hope at safety, maybe a true frosh at the other. Losing JoJo and the Sehome Stud are impossible to replace. Sorry you ignorant fucks but you just dont. Nor do u replace Murphy at corner. Molden will fill 1 spot, but you dont replace Murphy right away. There'll be consequences in the back 1/3 early next year.
If we played in the SEC things would be different, but we don't and they aren't.
Read my shit dipshit b4 picking it apart. I've said most everything u said, meaning uve plagiarized my shit then used it vs me. Hit the gate chucky.chuck said:Pumpster the DBs aren't green. Taylor played a shit ton and is really fucking good on the outside. Hampton, Gordon and Irvin all got good reps in. Molden is pretty experienced, McKinney is experienced, and Bryant is a true veteran. Lake is one of the best in the world at coaching guys up and we have a buttery soft schedule for them to get against.
The secondary will be fine. Better than fine.
The front seven is way more concerning, but the young talent pool is better than UW has ever had. Again they have a nice, easy intro to starting roles against our schedule.
Anything lower than top 2-3 in the conference would be surprising. I expect it will be the statistically best D in the Pac again. This is where you switch from rebuilding to reloading.
What Pup said is you just dont replace 4 starters, 2 all American and 1st-round picks with "guys who've got reps". Bama replaces 4 1st round picks with 5-star guys who've "got good reps in" and got destroyed by Ok and Clemson. If bama actually played in the big 12, pac12 or Big10, with a 9 game schedule and an OOC foe besides Louisville, they wood have had 2 losses. Their defensive backfield was shit, backers very average.
Starting experience matters in college football...figure that out and debate Pup next year. I praised hampton... but he's not ready to start
What's this shit about Bama? Were they part of this thread?
I didn't use anything "against" you good buddy. I'm here for you. In this case I helped you out by refuting your labeling of the secondary as "new fish". They are not. There are a shit ton of snaps coming back and the overall speed, size, and athleticism of the secondary will be improved NIT due to the two guys you put forth as being the saviors (two slot corners).
Now none of you know shit about Irvin or Gordon as they only played special teams In any meaningful minutes. So STFU b4 they produce, any of these guys besides KT and lesser extent McKinney produce. Could they be great? Sure, but bama fans just assumed they'd "reload " at db this year...they didnt. tOSU fans on bucknuts thought their frosh-soph db's would reload...they gave up big plays ALL FUCKING YEAR until Michigan game
Youd have to actually watch cfb to understand. Try it next year b4 you assume Jimmy Lake will roll out 4 AA's out the gates next year...fuck odear -
Btw pup, I tabbed Peters as the star recruit in his class on his signing day. You we're still there on doogman, with one handle or another after begging to be let back on. I don't remember which time or screen name but I bet you do.
