Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Mario to Miami confirmed
Comments
-
Leach owned Oregon for the core of his tenure at WSU, 4 straight wins from 2015-2018insinceredawg said:
-
Lacey and Tumwater are too expensive for meth heads anymore. They all live the Jay Insleeville Homeless Camp off of Wheeler or the Jay Insleeville Homeless Camp along Deschutes Parkway.TurdBomber said:
It takes a real classy city to glorify meth and heroin as Seattle and Portland have. But dare I say parts of Lacey and Tumwater outclass Seattle, and Gresham arguably tops Portland.PasadenaHuskyFan said:
Sure Miami has great cocaine, but they really can’t compete with our meth and heroinTurdBomber said:
Violent passionate Latinos who danced and partied til dawn, versus Jolt-Addicted pimply faced incels who loved StarTrek and turned us all into screen-tethered cunts.RaceBannon said:
Miami had the cocaine and Seattle had the techcreepycoug said:
I hate to threaten the hard-fought peace we worked so hard to achieve, but unless you are really drunk, this tells me you actually didn't go to Miami, but rather to Ocean Shores, and the football talk has caused a Mandella Effect.EwaDawg said:
I've been to Miami, exactly once. It's great if you like grey sand beaches that remind you of Ocean shores. I seriously expected much much much more. I will say it has been many years. Maybe it's more cosmopolitan now. Don't really care to go back. Guess it depends what you are looking for. Obviously its1000 steps up from Eugene.BleachedAnusDawg said:
https://www.timeout.com/miami/news/miami-was-voted-the-third-most-overrated-city-in-the-worldouch-091421creepycoug said:
This is a very good and accurate post. Objectively speaking.Swaye said:Miami is one of the best, if not the best big city in America. It's the culture of New York with the beautiful people and money of LA mixed with killer weather and the party vide of Mardi Gras with a Latin flavor. In short, who wouldn't leave that shithole Eugene to go rule Miiami?
Eugene, a piss break on the way to a better place.
That said, we must remember it's not for everybody. Think about some of our brothers here who have to live in shit hole places like Sedro Woolley, Everett, Castle Rock, Battleground ... and Canada.
A lot of dudes lack the requisite confidence, and frankly the swarthy'ness, to compete in a town like Miami. If one is missing the superior Cuban DNA, one is already at a distinct disadvantage. It takes big @Ballz to make it in my hometown. It's not for everybody. It's LA, but with a NY temperament of aggression, and withering humidity that makes pussies from out west melt.
We have to remember there are coaches who, like our less confident brothers, prefer being out in the middle of butt fuck nowhere so that they have some semblance of a chance to compete for T&A and the other good things life has to offer.
We have to remember that. Eugene and Sedro and Everett and Marysville and Castlerock and Battleground and Vancoover and Rochester and Pulltab and Spookanne are all essentially the same fucking place, and there is a good % of people who want to be in those places and hide from the world.
There is NOTHING about the beaches there that would remind you of Ocean Shores. Take it from the unicorn that was born in one place and grew up next to the other.
Most US cities are now more cosmopolitan than they once were. I'd say on the whole Miami has always been more cosmopolitan than Seattle, but Seattle has caught up. People forget Seattle used to be a fucking nowhere backwater as recently as the 1980s.
Couple of boom towns
I'll take the Cocaine with Bullets over hologram girlfriends every time.
As a Seattleite, I declare Miami the clear winner.
I don't know how Lynnwood has avoided it, but maybe being crotched between Bothell and Edmonds spares it.
-
Winning at WSU isn’t that impressive with the current state of the pac 12
-
Let’s deep dive Wilcox’s staff first before rationalizing it.RTD said:So it’s rationalize Wilcox and hypothetical staff time?
-
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
-
This should be interesting
-
Will keep an eye out for tie colors and report back.insinceredawg said:This should be interesting
-
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
-
I'm sure they will get a big-time OC but yeah, that's not necessarily a predictor of success. See: Joe Moorhead.theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years. It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine. Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade. He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs. -
Im calling Joe Brady to Whoregon.
-
Oregon is really going to finish 10-4 😂
-
2018 huskies without the conference title.PasadenaHuskyFan said:Oregon is really going to finish 10-4 😂
-
Oregon needs a head coach who has never won anything or been particularly good in any way.CallMeBigErn said:
I'm sure they will get a big-time OC but yeah, that's not necessarily a predictor of success. See: Joe Moorhead.theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years. It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine. Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade. He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs.
How many dimensions of chess must they be playing to have formed such a strategy, where only you and Kim can see the brilliance of it?
JFC I hope they hire Wilcox. I love Oregon with reduced recruiting prowess, overachieving "superior culture", and no offense. -
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs.
-
Or the Rose Bowl humiliation.haie said:
2018 huskies without the conference title.PasadenaHuskyFan said:Oregon is really going to finish 10-4 😂
-
Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
-
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs. -
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs. -
Wilcox sucks. I pray they hire him.CallMeBigErn said:Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
-
Substitute with two mountain west humiliations.MikeSeaver said:
Or the Rose Bowl humiliation.haie said:
2018 huskies without the conference title.PasadenaHuskyFan said:Oregon is really going to finish 10-4 😂
-
Sounds like a done deal.dnc said:
Wilcox sucks. I pray they hire him.CallMeBigErn said:Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
-
You may be right. You also may not be right. I'm just saying there's a decent possibility of him being better at Oregon with their resources than you might think. You folks need some Xannies.dnc said:
Wilcox sucks. I pray they hire him.CallMeBigErn said:Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
-
You were just stating that hiring Wilcox would bring 20 years of stability to Oregon.CallMeBigErn said:
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs. -
Bro, did you read the context? I'm saying there's a part of me that thinks that he could be the type to do so. Not saying he will ffs. I don't consider my opinion to be fact unlike some here. I'm raising the point that he could be good for Oregon as devil's advocate. Chill.Ice_Holmvik said:
You were just stating that hiring Wilcox would bring 20 years of stability to Oregon.CallMeBigErn said:
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs. -
Haha. Well said.CallMeBigErn said:Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
I'm not triggered at all. I used to be a Wilcox "booster" of sorts, changed to more of a fence sitting excuser, and have recently had a change of heart on him. I just don't understand what he has done to get himself mentioned for any FCS jobs. He has one HC position on his resume. At it's absolute best, his tenure there has been excusable because Cal. There isn't anything that stands out at all though. He's given UW and Oregon some problems. What else? Title contention? Cranking out NFL players? High end recruiting? Leading statistically at anything?
I just don't see what Wilcox has done, or does, that puts him in the conversation. That's all. -
A decent possibility is enough to justify a hire of a coach who has never succeeded anywhere?CallMeBigErn said:
You may be right. You also may not be right. I'm just saying there's a decent possibility of him being better at Oregon with their resources than you might think. You folks need some Xannies.dnc said:
Wilcox sucks. I pray they hire him.CallMeBigErn said:Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
Wouldn't you prefer to look at guys where the "decent possibility" is actually demonstrated by something that has actually happened? -
CallMeBigErn said:
Didn't realize suggesting Wilcox could be a good hire for Oregon was so triggering. What a bunch of fags.
-
Take it to the bank. This guy is part of the Miami Cuban blood brotherhood.insinceredawg said: -
He actually could be. I don't think it's a high probability, but I see your main point. I mean there are mega resources there, and if he could luck into or find a really quality innovative offensive mind he could maybe do some damage there. I'd have hated him at UW, but there is a different dynamic there.CallMeBigErn said:
Bro, did you read the context? I'm saying there's a part of me that thinks that he could be the type to do so. Not saying he will ffs. I don't consider my opinion to be fact unlike some here. I'm raising the point that he could be good for Oregon as devil's advocate. Chill.Ice_Holmvik said:
You were just stating that hiring Wilcox would bring 20 years of stability to Oregon.CallMeBigErn said:
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs.
The one thing that would worry me as a Duck fan (and you alluded to this arguing the other way though) is his "stable" (read that as boring) type mentality. Oregon has always been loud, garish and new money rich. It's a huge part of their persona. That is not Wilcox. So I appreciate you thinking he might "fix" that in a sense, but I think fixing it would break them. It's a 2nd tier school in a shithole town. What makes them get top 10 recruiting classes is the new money swagger.
Just my thoughts. On balance, I hope like fuck UO hires Wilcocks because I think there is a 10% chance or less he kills it. But there is a chance.
