Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Jackson Sirmon
Comments
-
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot. -
Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist.FireCohen said:
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing.
I now know who you voted for. -
The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.TurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about? -
Hahaha jokes on you. I don’t have the right to vote. bBK was not perfect, but his senior year he was better than Azim and KeyshawnTurdBomber said:
Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist.FireCohen said:
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing.
I now know who you voted for. -
Jesus, Chuck! That's exactly what I wrote, above. His senior year was markedly better, obviously.chuck said:
The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.TurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about?
Fuck! The hypersensitivity on these boreds is off-the-charts sometimes. -
Thank you for agreeing with me?FireCohen said:
Hahaha jokes on you. I don’t have the right to vote. bBK was not perfect, but his senior year he was better than Azim and KeyshawnTurdBomber said:
Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist.FireCohen said:
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing.
I now know who you voted for. -
You're exaggerating how bad he was before though. He came in under 200lbs iirc and never should have seen the field before his third year. We wouldn't have such a burned in image of him being dragged and carried if he hadn't been thrust into the lineup two years too early.TurdBomber said:
Jesus, Chuck! That's exactly what I wrote, above. His senior year was markedly better, obviously.chuck said:
The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.TurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about?
Fuck! The hypersensitivity on these boreds is off-the-charts sometimes. -
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. -
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. -
You use the word "woke"--the Frank-Luntz-focus-grouped, conservative trigger word de jour--in every single one of your posts like a good little lemming, but it's people who liked the play of a 5th round All-American linebacker who are guilty of groupthink? Jesus Fuck, dude, come back to reality and look the fuck around at who you're calling your new pet word they want you to say.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
I never thought anybody could give @haie a run for his money as the board's most insecure poster, buttfuck... -
I really hope this is some cringe attempt at a zoomer trying to make out of touch boomers look bad.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
This bored has no problem with booing the kids and calling them retarded pussies.
I can call you a chromsome collecting cunty little fag without anyone getting upset, this board isn't "woke" (whatever the fuck that means) and @DerekJohnson has done an incredible job at allowing free speech to flow here, maybe you're ideas are just retarded and your delivery lacks creativity. -
If everything is woke nothing is woke.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
You (mis)use the term like PGOS throws around doog.
Stop trying so damn hard. -
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here. -
This really isn't that complicated
BBK had an amazing senior season and was the man.
BBK was runny dog shit evey other year
BBK should of got. RS year
Sirmon has cinder block feet and wouldnt be BBK if he was here a decade
Can we all agree ane move on? -
We can at least agree that they have nothing in common, BBK and Sirmon that is, and that bringing BBK into a discussion about Sirmon really makes no sense.Sancho said:This really isn't that complicated
BBK had an amazing senior season and was the man.
BBK was runny dog shit evey other year
BBK should of got. RS year
Sirmon has cinder block feet and wouldnt be BBK if he was here a decade
Can we all agree ane move on? -
Who ended up winning?RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here. -
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward. -
You're spewing unintelligible gibberish and you're a legit weirdo. Fuck out of here.TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward. -
I like All American players that played for UW, but hey. Whatever you want to tell yourself bud.TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward. -
Btw, the admin and bad coaching hires are what ruined the program. The lack of winning led to less fan excitement. The only thing that matters from fans is the money they pump into the program. Tennessee has great fans and they suck. Bama sucked for years before Saban.TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward. -
Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. -
Nine chins.Quietcowskee said:
Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. -
Aren't you the guy that bought Tyee tickets during the Ty era?TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward.
Was that to show your appreciation for his hire?
Nice work, elite fan.
-
Fuck off bottom-feeder. How's the view from General Admission?dflea said:
Aren't you the guy that bought Tyee tickets during the Ty era?TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward.
Was that to show your appreciation for his hire?
Nice work, elite fan. -
You're a garbage fish that will bite any shitty bait that floats by.TurdBomber said:
Fuck off bottom-feeder. How's the view from General Admission?dflea said:
Aren't you the guy that bought Tyee tickets during the Ty era?TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward.
Was that to show your appreciation for his hire?
Nice work, elite fan.
You gave your Tyee money over to keep Ty on staff, faggot. Then called yourself an "elite" fan.
lmao -
Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on.Quietcowskee said:
Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Soft fanbase = soft program. -
You think BBK sucked, so that's not it.TurdBomber said:
Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on.Quietcowskee said:
Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Soft fanbase = soft program. -
That's not at all what I wrote. Be better than that.dnc said:
You think BBK sucked, so that's not it.TurdBomber said:
Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on.Quietcowskee said:
Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Soft fanbase = soft program. -
Jesus man you're drowning here and refuse to recognize it. Your entire output in this thread is the equivalent of:TurdBomber said:
Fuck off bottom-feeder. How's the view from General Admission?dflea said:
Aren't you the guy that bought Tyee tickets during the Ty era?TurdBomber said:
And you defend mediocrity. Shit takes and low expectations have ruined a once elite fanbase and a dominating program.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m not sensitive at all about it. Thinking BBK is good, because he was, is not sensitive.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Save the woke shit for the tug. We talk football and black women vs Native American women over here.
Keep up the good work, chumps. Shit-Tier bowls until 2030 will be your reward.
Was that to show your appreciation for his hire?
Nice work, elite fan.
-
You comped him to Jackson Sirmon.TurdBomber said:
That's not at all what I wrote. Be better than that.dnc said:
You think BBK sucked, so that's not it.TurdBomber said:
Or I simply know what good linebacker play looks like, but carry on.Quietcowskee said:
Geez, we get it. You’re on the Alex Jones supplement plan. Nobody cares.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
Soft fanbase = soft program.
Your move.
