Jackson Sirmon
Comments
-
We need LB’s with feces in their throats
-
You really don't get this place.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
-
A Friday sacrifice is long overdue.dnc said:
You really don't get this place.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
I may be willing to pay off @trublue's Wam membership if he's tossed off the board. -
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. -
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
-
If you don't care, why are mentioning it? Besides, you're not getting the point about the historical bullshit comment. 81% of your poasts are terrible.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. -
81% is low.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
If you don't care, why are mentioning it? Besides, you're not getting the point about the historical bullshit comment. 81% of your poasts are terrible.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator. -
He was great his senior yeardnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC. -
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year. -
30 tackles? If he made even half that he missed he would have around 300 tacklestrublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
