Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Jackson Sirmon
Options
Comments
-
HURTFULtrublue said:
You just did . . . Kunt.GrundleStiltzkin said:trublue said:Call him out then, “Mod”.
Otherwise, fuck off!
The stupid shit that emanates from his mouth daily . . . I must say his drunk poasting does add comedic value to the site . . .
My response, “Go FUCK yourself!” (along with your sidekicks), to wit: Fatters, PurpleBaze and dnc. -
Roadie was first and right on BBKRoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis. -
Imagine calling a poster stupid and then fucking up the @.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I have but again, his stupidity is opinion based. You muck up the boreds with inane historical bullshit that 99.9% of the world knows about while trying to pass it off as insightful.trublue said:Call him out then, “Mod”.
Otherwise, fuck off!
The stupid shit that emanates from his mouth daily . . . I must say his drunk poasting does add comedic value to the site . . .
Besides that, I don’t spend tim on the Duck bored to view the majority of @haie’s shit poasting.
Don’t give up hope though, at one point I was begging Stalin to make @backthepack the Friday sacrifice.
Retard fuck. -
So it's down to relativity. Or whataboutism (for the woke).FireCohen said:
Dude I am known for my shitty takes, but this take is beyond stupid. Did you not see Manu and Beefwellington play??TurdBomber said:
WeaknessesFireCohen said:
Dude if we had BBK in 2019 we win 11+ gamesTurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
Lack of size will push him off some draft boards
Low percentage of tackles on opponent's side of the ball
Takes steep pursuit angles and can end up on low side
Short arms show up with "just miss" tackle dives
Slow to punch and plays away from blocker
Downhill drift gets him trapped against counters
Gives away run fit with attempts to elude blocks
Must find a way to improve take-on leverage in the gap
Needs more control in approach to tackle receivers in big spaces
"That defensive line did a great job of protecting him so he could run around and make a bunch of plays. He's a fun player to watch, but I don't think the production translates." -- Scouting director for NFC team
Exhuming Manu and Wellington does not help your case. Sorry.
It only demonstrates how far the LB corps at UW have fallen. -
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers. -
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
-
Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
-
-
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality. -
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot. -
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot. -
Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist.FireCohen said:
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing.
I now know who you voted for. -
The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.TurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about? -
Hahaha jokes on you. I don’t have the right to vote. bBK was not perfect, but his senior year he was better than Azim and KeyshawnTurdBomber said:
Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist.FireCohen said:
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing.
I now know who you voted for. -
Jesus, Chuck! That's exactly what I wrote, above. His senior year was markedly better, obviously.chuck said:
The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.TurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about?
Fuck! The hypersensitivity on these boreds is off-the-charts sometimes. -
Thank you for agreeing with me?FireCohen said:
Hahaha jokes on you. I don’t have the right to vote. bBK was not perfect, but his senior year he was better than Azim and KeyshawnTurdBomber said:
Here we go with the relativity bullshit. Go home, collectivist.FireCohen said:
Dude did BBK plow your mother?? Why the negative view on him. We had some shifty LB at UW, he was not one of themTurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
Your fragile ego that cannot withstand opposing opinions is embarrassing.
I now know who you voted for. -
You're exaggerating how bad he was before though. He came in under 200lbs iirc and never should have seen the field before his third year. We wouldn't have such a burned in image of him being dragged and carried if he hadn't been thrust into the lineup two years too early.TurdBomber said:
Jesus, Chuck! That's exactly what I wrote, above. His senior year was markedly better, obviously.chuck said:
The award means he was the best defensive player in the league. The rest of what you said doesn't mean anything at all as far as this debate goes.TurdBomber said:
Special teams broken leg of the weak guy on a shitty team, now.AtomicDawg said:
I remember my criticizing the pac12 defensive player of the year days.TurdBomber said:
Jesus Roady. What BBK were you watching? He never got dragged. He got carried. Literally. On RBs backs. Repeatedly. Especially on 3rd down.RoadDawg55 said:
He really didn’t. He got dragged at times but he was always at least an above average PAC 12 LB, even as a sophomore. There aren’t many ways to run away from an ILB that plays sideline to sideline.TurdBomber said:
He spent two years overrunning the point of contact because he was fast, but not strong enough. When he could, he jumped on RBs backs a lot and got carried for several yards. He accumulated a lot of tackles, but gave up a lot of yards in critical situations.dnc said:
BBK was very good, GTFO with this tired narrative.TurdBomber said:
BBK and Psalm had great numbers too.trublue said:Hope this doesn’t muck up this thread because it’s “historical bullshit”:
Total Tackles thru Week 4:
Jackson Sirmon - 30
No. 1 for UW
Ranked 6th in the PAC-12 Conference
CFetters: When you see me post, how about ignoring it or simply downvoting it? Frankly, I don’t give a flying fuck about your critique. You’re a moderator.
Unfortunately they don't keep LB stats on how many YPC they allow versus should allow, if they were any good.
Opposing RB YAC stats on BBK and Psalm were off the charts, also, as they piggybacked on RBs running by and over them for 8 YPC.
He became more disciplined over time, gained a few pounds and strength, and became more effective at pressuring the QB and collapsing the pocket in his final year. His angles got better as did his technique as he focused more on interrupting the backfield than hooking the QB for an arm tackle sack as he flew by. He was never an LB that blew up plays or that teams ran away from. He was fast and athletic but nothing "very good" until his last year.
When he was a junior there were posters that said he was only good because of Vea. Then when Vea left, he got even better. BBK bullshit was always strong group think led by Dennis.
He was very good at getting to the play, but not at executing it, because he lacked the size, strength and tackling ability to finish guys off without help. He got better his final year after sizing up and improving his techniques.
I'm sure it irks you, Roady, but DDY was right about BBK.
DDY's head was firmly up his ass on plenty of stuff, but not BBK. Or Browning. Or our shitty receivers.
He had his flaws but was a good player. End of story.
Some awards don't mean a lot.
And I'm all for insulting the players. BBK was pretty good but limited for much of his career. As a senior he stepped it up and was just plain good. It got him drafted. What is there to argue about?
Fuck! The hypersensitivity on these boreds is off-the-charts sometimes. -
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks. -
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point. -
You use the word "woke"--the Frank-Luntz-focus-grouped, conservative trigger word de jour--in every single one of your posts like a good little lemming, but it's people who liked the play of a 5th round All-American linebacker who are guilty of groupthink? Jesus Fuck, dude, come back to reality and look the fuck around at who you're calling your new pet word they want you to say.TurdBomber said:
Fuck your hypersensitivity. It is patently woke and a hallmark of your generation.RoadDawg55 said:
You’re a weirdo with this woke shit. I’m not consumed by it like you. Most here aren’t.TurdBomber said:
Gladly. Just had to dispense with the sensitive woketivists first.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Can we stop arguing over how good or bad BBK was and get back to discussing how dum @trublue is?
So dumb he doesn’t even deserve the correct spelling of the word.
Odd how expressing a negative opinion about a player generates so much worry and bruises so many egos.
Perhaps some youngsters on these boreds are too invested in this mediocre program to see reality.
He was good. I watched him play many games. This board, myself included has no problem saying a player sucks.
Thank you for ostensibly speaking for "this board" Mr. Group-Think.
You couldn't have done a better job of proving my point.
I never thought anybody could give @haie a run for his money as the board's most insecure poster, buttfuck...
