Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You know who really did collude with Putin and the Russians to undermine...

1235789

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,207

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    Trump Was Exonerated potd!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,207

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    Trump Was Exonerated potd!
    Speaking of dumb Kunts not weighed down by facts or logic.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,759
    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,207
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,759
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

    If you're not amongst the dumbfucks arguing that Daddy was exonerated, why are you taking fire for them?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,848 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2019

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,207
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

    If you're not amongst the dumbfucks arguing that Daddy was exonerated, why are you taking fire for them?
    Hmmm, never said that either. I'm just applying the Kunt logic you guys are employing to the situation as we know it.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,759
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
    Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,759
    edited March 2019
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

    If you're not amongst the dumbfucks arguing that Daddy was exonerated, why are you taking fire for them?
    Hmmm, never said that either. I'm just applying the Kunt logic you guys are employing to the situation as we know it.
    Maybe you should get a grasp on the threads before you weigh in then. I accept your explanation that you came prematurely.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,795 Founders Club
    The underlying grounds or obstruction was a media report that Trump was "thinking about" firing Mueller

    Gee wonder why that couldn't be proven

    Trump was exonerated. Eat shit

    You got your fucking investigation and it didn't prove shit so take it like a man for once in your lives
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,759

    The underlying grounds or obstruction was a media report that Trump was "thinking about" firing Mueller

    Gee wonder why that couldn't be proven

    Trump was exonerated. Eat shit

    You got your fucking investigation and it didn't prove shit so take it like a man for once in your lives

    It was only 4 pages, Race. You couldn't be troubled to read it?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,795 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    The underlying grounds or obstruction was a media report that Trump was "thinking about" firing Mueller

    Gee wonder why that couldn't be proven

    Trump was exonerated. Eat shit

    You got your fucking investigation and it didn't prove shit so take it like a man for once in your lives

    It was only 4 pages, Race. You couldn't be troubled to read it?
    Who says I didn't?

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,848 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
    Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?
    How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
    Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?
    How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.
    You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,848 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
    Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?
    How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.
    You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.
    Prove me wrong.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
    Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?
    How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.
    You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.
    Prove me wrong.
    You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,759
    Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HHusky said:

    Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.

    He doesn't know what explicitly means. So I'll add that the memo clearly stated they are not exonerating Trump.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,795 Founders Club
    Trump exonerated of obstruction?

    Good news for America

Sign In or Register to comment.