Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You know who really did collude with Putin and the Russians to undermine...

1356

Comments

  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    edited March 2019

    SFGbob said:

    His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.

    Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.

    http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk


    The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.

    They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.
    Everything he did?


    Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
    Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.
    You're saying it now

    It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt

    And you're running cover
    Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.
    C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    SFGbob said:

    His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.

    Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.

    http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk


    The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.

    They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.
    Everything he did?


    Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
    Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.
    You're saying it now

    It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt

    And you're running cover
    Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.
    C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.
    That kid was going to grow up into a white male though
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter
    It absolutely was a coup attempt. No question about it. All based on manufactured lies from the opposition party, candidate and sitting president Obama with a complicit MSM to do the heavy lifting.

    Originally intended to throw the election Hillary's way it was turned into a coup attempt of the legally elected sitting president. That is indeed treason.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I'll wait for the report. I guess Don Jr is lucky Russia really didn't have anything to give him. Pardon me if I don't feel Charles Krauthammer and I really owe anything to you at this point.

    Meanwhile, evidence of obstruction was substantial enough that Mueller wouldn't exonerate Daddy. I have no problem with an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to charge: we're even on that score. And the tax/financial/campaign finance crimes are all but proven. And that's not to ignore that not every reprehensible act or attitude displayed by Daddy is criminal.

    Daddy is innocent until proven guilty of course. Like OJ.

    Keep hope alive!!!!!

    $50 million dollars and 30 pro-Clinton attorneys and a hundred plus FBI agents issuing 500 plus subpoenas coupled with months of secret grand jury testimony and that's the best you've got Kunt?

    Fucking pathetic.
    I’ve seen a four page letter. If you have the report, please post it.
    No further indictments, no collusion. I see egg all over your fucking face O'Keefed. What happened to all of those claims about Trump being Putin's puppet Kunt?


    Don't worry, I never expected you to have the integrity to admit you were wrong. You never have, even after you swallowed like a bitch and claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away, you didn't admit that you were wrong. Dunking on your ignorant ass is one of your more enduring qualities O'Keefed.
    Funny how you now stand behind "no *further* indictments". But when Hillary was cleared you still called her a criminal.
    She wasn't "cleared". Ever. The Obozo administration said don't prosecute her. Big difference.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I'll wait for the report. I guess Don Jr is lucky Russia really didn't have anything to give him. Pardon me if I don't feel Charles Krauthammer and I really owe anything to you at this point.

    Meanwhile, evidence of obstruction was substantial enough that Mueller wouldn't exonerate Daddy. I have no problem with an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to charge: we're even on that score. And the tax/financial/campaign finance crimes are all but proven. And that's not to ignore that not every reprehensible act or attitude displayed by Daddy is criminal.

    Daddy is innocent until proven guilty of course. Like OJ.

    Keep hope alive!!!!!

    $50 million dollars and 30 pro-Clinton attorneys and a hundred plus FBI agents issuing 500 plus subpoenas coupled with months of secret grand jury testimony and that's the best you've got Kunt?

    Fucking pathetic.
    I’ve seen a four page letter. If you have the report, please post it.
    No further indictments, no collusion. I see egg all over your fucking face O'Keefed. What happened to all of those claims about Trump being Putin's puppet Kunt?


    Don't worry, I never expected you to have the integrity to admit you were wrong. You never have, even after you swallowed like a bitch and claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away, you didn't admit that you were wrong. Dunking on your ignorant ass is one of your more enduring qualities O'Keefed.
    Funny how you now stand behind "no *further* indictments". But when Hillary was cleared you still called her a criminal.
    She wasn't "cleared". Ever. The Obozo administration said don't prosecute her. Big difference.
    Daddy wasn't cleared either.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I'll wait for the report. I guess Don Jr is lucky Russia really didn't have anything to give him. Pardon me if I don't feel Charles Krauthammer and I really owe anything to you at this point.

    Meanwhile, evidence of obstruction was substantial enough that Mueller wouldn't exonerate Daddy. I have no problem with an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to charge: we're even on that score. And the tax/financial/campaign finance crimes are all but proven. And that's not to ignore that not every reprehensible act or attitude displayed by Daddy is criminal.

    Daddy is innocent until proven guilty of course. Like OJ.

    Keep hope alive!!!!!

    $50 million dollars and 30 pro-Clinton attorneys and a hundred plus FBI agents issuing 500 plus subpoenas coupled with months of secret grand jury testimony and that's the best you've got Kunt?

    Fucking pathetic.
    I’ve seen a four page letter. If you have the report, please post it.
    No further indictments, no collusion. I see egg all over your fucking face O'Keefed. What happened to all of those claims about Trump being Putin's puppet Kunt?


    Don't worry, I never expected you to have the integrity to admit you were wrong. You never have, even after you swallowed like a bitch and claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away, you didn't admit that you were wrong. Dunking on your ignorant ass is one of your more enduring qualities O'Keefed.
    Funny how you now stand behind "no *further* indictments". But when Hillary was cleared you still called her a criminal.
    She wasn't "cleared". Ever. The Obozo administration said don't prosecute her. Big difference.
    Daddy wasn't cleared either.
    So is Mueller in on the cover up? Are there really crimes that Trump committed and Barr just won't prosecute him for them O'Keefed? It's Mike Brown all over again isn't it Kunt.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I'll wait for the report. I guess Don Jr is lucky Russia really didn't have anything to give him. Pardon me if I don't feel Charles Krauthammer and I really owe anything to you at this point.

    Meanwhile, evidence of obstruction was substantial enough that Mueller wouldn't exonerate Daddy. I have no problem with an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to charge: we're even on that score. And the tax/financial/campaign finance crimes are all but proven. And that's not to ignore that not every reprehensible act or attitude displayed by Daddy is criminal.

    Daddy is innocent until proven guilty of course. Like OJ.

    Keep hope alive!!!!!

    $50 million dollars and 30 pro-Clinton attorneys and a hundred plus FBI agents issuing 500 plus subpoenas coupled with months of secret grand jury testimony and that's the best you've got Kunt?

    Fucking pathetic.
    I’ve seen a four page letter. If you have the report, please post it.
    No further indictments, no collusion. I see egg all over your fucking face O'Keefed. What happened to all of those claims about Trump being Putin's puppet Kunt?


    Don't worry, I never expected you to have the integrity to admit you were wrong. You never have, even after you swallowed like a bitch and claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away, you didn't admit that you were wrong. Dunking on your ignorant ass is one of your more enduring qualities O'Keefed.
    Funny how you now stand behind "no *further* indictments". But when Hillary was cleared you still called her a criminal.
    She wasn't "cleared". Ever. The Obozo administration said don't prosecute her. Big difference.
    Daddy wasn't cleared either.
    So is Mueller in on the cover up? Are there really crimes that Trump committed and Barr just won't prosecute him for them O'Keefed? It's Mike Brown all over again isn't it Kunt.
    Even Bob Barr says Daddy wasn't cleared. And he's Daddy's guy.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I'll wait for the report. I guess Don Jr is lucky Russia really didn't have anything to give him. Pardon me if I don't feel Charles Krauthammer and I really owe anything to you at this point.

    Meanwhile, evidence of obstruction was substantial enough that Mueller wouldn't exonerate Daddy. I have no problem with an exercise of prosecutorial discretion not to charge: we're even on that score. And the tax/financial/campaign finance crimes are all but proven. And that's not to ignore that not every reprehensible act or attitude displayed by Daddy is criminal.

    Daddy is innocent until proven guilty of course. Like OJ.

    Keep hope alive!!!!!

    $50 million dollars and 30 pro-Clinton attorneys and a hundred plus FBI agents issuing 500 plus subpoenas coupled with months of secret grand jury testimony and that's the best you've got Kunt?

    Fucking pathetic.
    I’ve seen a four page letter. If you have the report, please post it.
    No further indictments, no collusion. I see egg all over your fucking face O'Keefed. What happened to all of those claims about Trump being Putin's puppet Kunt?


    Don't worry, I never expected you to have the integrity to admit you were wrong. You never have, even after you swallowed like a bitch and claimed Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away, you didn't admit that you were wrong. Dunking on your ignorant ass is one of your more enduring qualities O'Keefed.
    Funny how you now stand behind "no *further* indictments". But when Hillary was cleared you still called her a criminal.
    She wasn't "cleared". Ever. The Obozo administration said don't prosecute her. Big difference.
    Daddy wasn't cleared either.
    So is Mueller in on the cover up? Are there really crimes that Trump committed and Barr just won't prosecute him for them O'Keefed? It's Mike Brown all over again isn't it Kunt.
    Even Bob Barr says Daddy wasn't cleared. And he's Daddy's guy.
    Read the end of the story rocket boy. Without a crime there is nothing to obstruct.

    https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/25/politics/mueller-report-barr-obstruction-decoded/index.html
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    Read the post above your own dingus.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    Read the post above your own dingus.
    A “man of integrity” would answer a simple question. You never do. Sad.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2019

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    Read the post above your own dingus.
    A “man of integrity” would answer a simple question. You never do. Sad.
    Yes. Your problem is you can't admit it.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-mccarthy-how-long-has-mueller-known-there-was-no-trump-russia-collusion
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    Read the post above your own dingus.
    A “man of integrity” would answer a simple question. You never do. Sad.
    Yes. Your problem is you can't admit it.
    So you didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    Read the post above your own dingus.
    A “man of integrity” would answer a simple question. You never do. Sad.
    Yes. Your problem is you can't admit it.
    So you didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.
    To be fair Trump didn't read it either. I'm exonerated!!!! (Not really)
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club
    Keep hope alive

    Trump is guilty because we want him to be
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Trump was exonerated!
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    We're taking Barr at his word. What part is too difficult?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    Trump Was Exonerated potd!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    Trump Was Exonerated potd!
    Speaking of dumb Kunts not weighed down by facts or logic.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

    If you're not amongst the dumbfucks arguing that Daddy was exonerated, why are you taking fire for them?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,662 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2019

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

    If you're not amongst the dumbfucks arguing that Daddy was exonerated, why are you taking fire for them?
    Hmmm, never said that either. I'm just applying the Kunt logic you guys are employing to the situation as we know it.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.

    According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?

    "In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."

    Read for comprehension.
    Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    edited March 2019
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Jesus they have lost it. Barr flat out lied and there's a massive bombshell that they are trying to cover up

    Or, they are fucking with the Dems because they fall for it every time.

    You'd think Nancy or someone would be telling them to temper expectations

    And for this conspiracy theory to work you've got to believe that Mueller is in on the cover up. His report details all kinds of crimes and sins committed by Trump and Barr is just refusing to prosecute anyone for those crimes, and Mueller is cool with that.

    But then if Mueller is so corrupt, why would anyone believe his report in the first place?

    When you engage in Kunt logic you don't let these kind of inconsistencies weigh you down.
    It was only a four page letter, blob. Where did you get lost?
    Doesn't address a fucking word I said.

    If you're not amongst the dumbfucks arguing that Daddy was exonerated, why are you taking fire for them?
    Hmmm, never said that either. I'm just applying the Kunt logic you guys are employing to the situation as we know it.
    Maybe you should get a grasp on the threads before you weigh in then. I accept your explanation that you came prematurely.