My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
How are you planning on amending the constitution?
My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
How are you planning on amending the constitution?
Constitutional law experts could work out the details of how something like that could be implemented. Preventing the changes from being altered or reversed every time a new regime takes power is the important thing.
My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
How are you planning on amending the constitution?
Constitutional law experts could work out the details of how something like that could be implemented. Preventing the changes from being altered or reversed every time a new regime takes power is the important thing.
Because Congress has a history of getting things done.
That being said, there is a process in the Constitution outlined to do a constitutional amendment. I'm surprised a constitutional scholar such as yourself isn't aware of this.
My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
How are you planning on amending the constitution?
Constitutional law experts could work out the details of how something like that could be implemented. Preventing the changes from being altered or reversed every time a new regime takes power is the important thing.
Because Congress has a history of getting things done.
That being said, there is a process in the Constitution outlined to do a constitutional amendment. I'm surprised a constitutional scholar such as yourself isn't aware of this.
That, or send the military to the border and to sanctuary cities, begin instructing ICE to round up and deport every last illegal in the country if democrats still refuse to come to the table, which is what should be happening right now, at this moment.
My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
How are you planning on amending the constitution?
Constitutional law experts could work out the details of how something like that could be implemented. Preventing the changes from being altered or reversed every time a new regime takes power is the important thing.
My plan wins for the people you pretend to care about, the democrats, and Trump
That's called good politics
15 to 20 million people is a high price to pay. I would only go along with your plan if the other side loses a very heavy pound of flesh. End chain migration permanently using a Constitutional amendment that would prevent open borders democrats from reversing it if they ever take power again. Nothing short of that is acceptable. I would want another Constitutional amendment specifying that the default immigration quota should revert to zero every year, and make the process to increase immigration quotas extremely difficult, requiring enough votes to make it a bipartisan process. The Visa lottery system would need to be abolished permanently. Full funding for the border wall.
How are you planning on amending the constitution?
Constitutional law experts could work out the details of how something like that could be implemented. Preventing the changes from being altered or reversed every time a new regime takes power is the important thing.
So, no plan then.
Delegate to the legal experts who could work out the details.
That's why Mexico is building one on their south border
Your masters know they work and they don't want that
Underwater walls are the best walls. C’mon Race, the Wall is fucking stupid. That 25 Billion would be better used to either gas up the busses for the mass deportation or set up the vetting system of who wins the Amnesty gayme.
Comments
How stupid is he?
That being said, there is a process in the Constitution outlined to do a constitutional amendment. I'm surprised a constitutional scholar such as yourself isn't aware of this.
So even though it makes tons of sense to come to a good compromise on illegal immigration they know they are done if they give an inch.
They've made their bed
And it's the stupidest fucking hill to die on.
Protecting people who can't even vote for you at the expense of what is supposed to be your base.