Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.
How exactly would your stateless utopia function in reality. No state, no military, no country. Putin and Xi would really like that.
Where did I ever suggest a stateless society?
In another thread, unless you were trolling.
Link?
Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free Damone, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
How exactly would your stateless utopia function in reality. No state, no military, no country. Putin and Xi would really like that.
Where did I ever suggest a stateless society?
In another thread, unless you were trolling.
Link?
Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free Damone, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.
No link. That’s what I thought. Because I never said that.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.
I’d recommend a refresher
You're the resident tome of economics history and scholarship. But I'm not sure you consider all of the possible outcomes if the philosophies you follow were into practice. For example, what level of social unrest would be caused by an open borders policy, and how would it be contained? If the people in a libertarian country voted in a communist government, what would happen then? It doesn't seem to have the answers to those kinds of questions. Libertarianism doesn't seem capable of defending its own existence in certain situations.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
This is a Hondo level poast.
Do you agree with property rights and self ownership? Hondo doesn’t.
Who doesn't agree with property rights, except for commies and socialists. Define self ownership.
You’re not familiar with Locke? Are you being serious about not knowing what self ownership is? This leads me to believe you also are not clear on property rights.
I've read his shit but its been awhile. Everyone has the right to control their own body and life, sure, up to the point where it infringes on someone else's life or liberty.
I’d recommend a refresher
You're the resident tome of economics history and scholarship. But I'm not sure you consider all of the possible outcomes if the philosophies you follow were into practice. For example, what level of social unrest would be caused by an open borders policy, and how would it be contained? If the people in a libertarian country voted in a communist government, what would happen then? It doesn't seem to have the answers to those kinds of questions. It doesn't seem capable of defending its own existence.
You create some nice strawmen to attack.
What is the basis for the assumption that there would be social unrest? People only immigrante if there is opportunity. If there is little opportunity there is no immigration.
Libertarianism has its merits but it also has its limitations. As far as ever becoming a viable political/social system, it just doesn't pass the stress test.
Because right or left, people love the state and fight to use it to their gain and disagree with property rights and self ownership. You certainly do.
How exactly would your stateless utopia function in reality. No state, no military, no country. Putin and Xi would really like that.
Where did I ever suggest a stateless society?
In another thread, unless you were trolling.
Link?
Can't have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com cunt, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free Damone, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.
No link. That’s what I thought. Because I never said that.
I dig this response. From the dude who is a master at putting words in people's mouths.
Comments
What is the basis for the assumption that there would be social unrest? People only immigrante if there is opportunity. If there is little opportunity there is no immigration.