Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Very biblical

179111213

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.

    I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.

    This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.

    OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.

    I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
    Its all about legal versus illegal. Jesus Christ that's a stupid statement

    As stupid as thinking I said you had a problem with legal immigration

    I don't have a problem with it. Immigration should be to help America. Period

    Play the race card you fucking moron. Its what losers do
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116

    Creep admires Soviet Russia and keeps a portrait of Mao Zedong in his study.

    Nice try on the flip comrade.

    You are the pinko in today's dicushun. Everyone knows it too. Those pictures are on my wall to remind me what evil looks like. They're on your wall for inspiration. That's the difference between us.

    Never thought I'd see conservatism used as means to support socialism.

    Sad.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,849

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.

    I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.

    This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.

    OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.

    I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
    Sounds scary.


    Like creep off the meds scary.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,347 Founders Club
    Furthermore, when

    Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.

    @creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.



    Too late.

    HTH

    Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.

    PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.

    And, what happened 5 years later anyway?

    See?

    There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.

    Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
    Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.

    Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly

    Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116

    Squirt said:

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Mike Leach, is that you?
    Take a shot at answering the questions

    If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
    As many as the market will absorb.

    Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.

    I should not have to explain this to you.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club

    Furthermore, when

    Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.

    @creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.



    Too late.

    HTH

    Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.

    PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.

    And, what happened 5 years later anyway?

    See?

    There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.

    Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
    Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.

    Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly

    Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
    There is a great HBO show on the Latin Explosion in entertainment which has those same numbers. Its neither good nor bad on its face. J Lo is welcome. MS 13 not so much

    America needs people that will share our common bond and be net givers to the treasury

    If unskilled illegals are such a fucking boon to a country I am surprised there are any poor folks left around the world. Mexico should have a larger economy than we do
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club
    Yellow and I are close on a lot of issues it seems but we rarely admit it
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,347 Founders Club

    Squirt said:

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Mike Leach, is that you?
    Take a shot at answering the questions

    If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
    As many as the market will absorb.

    Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.

    I should not have to explain this to you.
    You are correct in the sense that the "market" forces for cheap Mexico labor, did cause the immigration from there to be negative from 2009- 15.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    No one hates you or your family Creep, not here anyway, only your fucktarded open border philosophy, hth.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    All of them. There’s a huge opportunity in California. The construction trades are a fucking scam and need a boost of competition and cost control. Guest workers to start, and with a path to citizenship.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club

    Squirt said:

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Mike Leach, is that you?
    Take a shot at answering the questions

    If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
    As many as the market will absorb.

    Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.

    I should not have to explain this to you.
    You didn't have to "explain" anything because it is ludicrous

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.

    I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.

    This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.

    OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.

    I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
    Its all about legal versus illegal. Jesus Christ that's a stupid statement

    As stupid as thinking I said you had a problem with legal immigration

    I don't have a problem with it. Immigration should be to help America. Period

    Play the race card you fucking moron. Its what losers do
    If you don't think this issue has been politicized to politically marshal people who don't like certain types of people here, then unfortunately it's you who's gone full moron. The lower class and uneducated in this country in particular are being used for this just as much as you like to point out that Dems use immigrants for votes. Same game. You're just selective in what you chose to observe.

    While there's nothing wrong with appropriately managing immigration, there is a lot wrong with moving it to the number one spot on the hit list and making the citizenry freak out about an issue in complete disproportion to its importance. I'd rather see him continue applying pressure on our trade partners and spend less time on this shit. An immigrant raped someone. An immigrant stole some guy's car. Jesus help you if you don't see it.

    Immigration should be to help America. And it pretty much always has.

    And quit having temper tantrums. It's not manly.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,347 Founders Club

    Yellow and I are close on a lot of issues it seems but we rarely admit it

    There's probably 70- 81% agreement on policy. Enough that you could have a party platform that we could all agree upon.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116
    edited June 2018

    Furthermore, when

    Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.

    @creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.



    Too late.

    HTH

    Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.

    PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.

    And, what happened 5 years later anyway?

    See?

    There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.

    Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
    Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.

    Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly

    Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
    I made up the quote about Jefferson. I thought you'd see that right away, but I forgot how far you've fallen. Sad.

    And is it your contention that the country has been in a free fall since 1960? And who cares that they were born in Latin America? Why does that matter ... at all? When the % of people who were born in Ireland started to move the needle here did the country fail? Were the people who were freaking out about it, then, doing so for valid reasons that were later validated?

    Kreist almighty. This is my point. This isn't a major problem. It's been made one, like, in the last year or two.

  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

    Yellow and I are close on a lot of issues it seems but we rarely admit it

    There's probably 70- 81% agreement on policy. Enough that you could have a party platform that we could all agree upon.
    disagree
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116
    salemcoog said:

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.

    I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.

    This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.

    OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.

    I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
    Sounds scary.


    Like creep off the meds scary.
    Says the guy who says he's living in NW Mexico. Tell me about it.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.

    I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.

    This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.

    OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.

    I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
    Its all about legal versus illegal. Jesus Christ that's a stupid statement

    As stupid as thinking I said you had a problem with legal immigration

    I don't have a problem with it. Immigration should be to help America. Period

    Play the race card you fucking moron. Its what losers do
    If you don't think this issue has been politicized to politically marshal people who don't like certain types of people here, then unfortunately it's you who's gone full moron. The lower class and uneducated in this country in particular are being used for this just as much as you like to point out that Dems use immigrants for votes. Same game. You're just selective in what you chose to observe.

    While there's nothing wrong with appropriately managing immigration, there is a lot wrong with moving it to the number one spot on the hit list and making the citizenry freak out about an issue in complete disproportion to its importance. I'd rather see him continue applying pressure on our trade partners and spend less time on this shit. An immigrant raped someone. An immigrant stole some guy's car. Jesus help you if you don't see it.

    Immigration should be to help America. And it pretty much always has.

    And quit having temper tantrums. It's not manly.
    I'm arguing with 6 or 7 people across three platforms. I don't have time for niceties and if you argue like hondo you get the fuck off he gets

    Iron Law

    You have made it a race issue just like your democrat masters who want open borders like you do have told you too

    It is a huge fucking issue and has nothing to do with racism.

    When you pull that card you might as well log off and call it a day

    Its the self titled elite who make this the issue it is by trying to get open borders. We are not going to take it. And we is a whole lot of Blacks my man. A whole lot

    They see what the democrats are doing
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116

    Furthermore, when

    Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.

    @creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.



    Too late.

    HTH

    Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.

    PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.

    And, what happened 5 years later anyway?

    See?

    There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.

    Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
    Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.

    Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly

    Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
    There is a great HBO show on the Latin Explosion in entertainment which has those same numbers. Its neither good nor bad on its face. J Lo is welcome. MS 13 not so much

    America needs people that will share our common bond and be net givers to the treasury

    If unskilled illegals are such a fucking boon to a country I am surprised there are any poor folks left around the world. Mexico should have a larger economy than we do
    If you'd paid attention in Professor Hayne's course instead of sleeping off your hangover, you'd know why Mexico is poor even with a lot of poor.

    No capital.

    And we will be poor too if our capital is left to rot on the vine, because it won't be left to rot on the vine. It will be exported. You think we're shipping off jobs now. Keep it up Lenin.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club

    Furthermore, when

    Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.

    @creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.



    Too late.

    HTH

    Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.

    PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.

    And, what happened 5 years later anyway?

    See?

    There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.

    Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
    Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.

    Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly

    Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
    I made up the quote about Jefferson. I thought you'd see that right away, but I forgot how far you've fallen. Sad.

    And is it your contention that the country has been in a free fall since 1960? And who cares that they were born in Latin America? Why does that matter ... at all? When the % of people who were born in Ireland started to move the needle here did the country fail? Were the people who were freaking out about it, then, doing so for valid reasons that were later validated?

    Kreist almighty. This is my point. This isn't a major problem. It's been made one, like, in the last year or two.

    That must be why Bill Clinton ran against illegal immigration and his wife and Obama did in 2008. That's why we had amnesty in the 80's

    Because racists the last two years!!! For fucks sake
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,116
    edited June 2018

    Squirt said:

    LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine

    You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make

    I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.

    If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?

    How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?

    Your argument is retarded

    Mike Leach, is that you?
    Take a shot at answering the questions

    If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
    As many as the market will absorb.

    Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.

    I should not have to explain this to you.
    You didn't have to "explain" anything because it is ludicrous

    The relative availability of capital and labor in Mexico and the US is ludicrous? Ok.

    Your conversion is evidently complete.
Sign In or Register to comment.