Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kyle Ford, 4* 2019 WR, Anaheim (Servite), CA (Offered 5/21/17)

1262729313269

Comments

  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Baseman said:

    Interesting that Lubick is being sent with a babysitter (Hamdan) to visit Ford and McCoy this week. Over the weekend, Malloe chaperoned him on his visit with Puka. The only guy Lubick is seeing on his own is already-committed Taj Davis.

    Either Lubick is heading elsewhere next year or Pete doesn't trust him alone with recruits.

    I thought sending multiple coaches was common? I wouldn’t be shocked if Lubick isn’t here for long. We’ve had two years in a row of shitty WR play.
    In Lubick’s defense, Pease recruited the current group of receivers. Fuller and Baciella have played well given their limited toolboxes. Ty Jones has so far been meh. Evaluators had him as a big HS talent, prone to mental lapses and taking plays off.

    I believe he closed Yankoff?

    Lubick may suck but I’m not ready to go there yet.

    Several thought Huff sucked, too. He’s demonstrated he can recruit the results from the development side—positive—recently kicked in.

    People were skeptical of the Huff hire. He immediately went to work and proved everyone wrong. Not really the same thing.
    @NorwegianHusky!!! True???
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,507 Standard Supporter

    Baseman said:

    Interesting that Lubick is being sent with a babysitter (Hamdan) to visit Ford and McCoy this week. Over the weekend, Malloe chaperoned him on his visit with Puka. The only guy Lubick is seeing on his own is already-committed Taj Davis.

    Either Lubick is heading elsewhere next year or Pete doesn't trust him alone with recruits.

    I thought sending multiple coaches was common? I wouldn’t be shocked if Lubick isn’t here for long. We’ve had two years in a row of shitty WR play.
    In Lubick’s defense, Pease recruited the current group of receivers. Fuller and Baciella have played well given their limited toolboxes. Ty Jones has so far been meh. Evaluators had him as a big HS talent, prone to mental lapses and taking plays off.

    I believe he closed Yankoff?

    Lubick may suck but I’m not ready to go there yet.

    Several thought Huff sucked, too. He’s demonstrated he can recruit the results from the development side—positive—recently kicked in.

    People were skeptical of the Huff hire. He immediately went to work and proved everyone wrong. Not really the same thing.
    @NorwegianHusky!!! True???
    A world exists
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Only so many guys we are talking to ... that also could be an explanation

    WR play has been probably what we should have expected it to be this year

    Awful
    Elaborate
    They’re actually not that bad just so low ceiling. We could have a whole thread about Jake and ty but Jake can win big games if he has guys like hunter Bryant all over the field. Asking him to depend on Aaron and Andre is setting him up to fail. Once Eason gets in there it will be the opposite where he is carrying guys like that instead of being a senior and having Joe Ngata and Kyle Ford when you play Alabama.


    Did our receivers suck this year? Not really. But everything needs to be graded on a spectrum of “are they good enough to beat Bama?” Nothing else matters.
    I am big fan of fuller, very happy that the kid put all that hard work and is making the most of it, but we all know he at best a good #2 option. To expect more from him is unfair
    Fuller is more like a 3 or 4 IMO ... he's not an outside guy
  • LaMichael_CorleoneLaMichael_Corleone Member Posts: 1,316
    edited December 2018
    This should insult you. How dumb does he think we are?


  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,981 Swaye's Wigwam

    Baseman said:

    Interesting that Lubick is being sent with a babysitter (Hamdan) to visit Ford and McCoy this week. Over the weekend, Malloe chaperoned him on his visit with Puka. The only guy Lubick is seeing on his own is already-committed Taj Davis.

    Either Lubick is heading elsewhere next year or Pete doesn't trust him alone with recruits.

    I thought sending multiple coaches was common? I wouldn’t be shocked if Lubick isn’t here for long. We’ve had two years in a row of shitty WR play.
    In Lubick’s defense, Pease recruited the current group of receivers. Fuller and Baciella have played well given their limited toolboxes. Ty Jones has so far been meh. Evaluators had him as a big HS talent, prone to mental lapses and taking plays off.

    I believe he closed Yankoff?

    Lubick may suck but I’m not ready to go there yet.

    Several thought Huff sucked, too. He’s demonstrated he can recruit the results from the development side—positive—recently kicked in.

    People were skeptical of the Huff hire. He immediately went to work and proved everyone wrong. Not really the same thing.
    How about Malloe then? Roundly panned and called for his firing. Now look where we are.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited December 2018

    Baseman said:

    Interesting that Lubick is being sent with a babysitter (Hamdan) to visit Ford and McCoy this week. Over the weekend, Malloe chaperoned him on his visit with Puka. The only guy Lubick is seeing on his own is already-committed Taj Davis.

    Either Lubick is heading elsewhere next year or Pete doesn't trust him alone with recruits.

    I thought sending multiple coaches was common? I wouldn’t be shocked if Lubick isn’t here for long. We’ve had two years in a row of shitty WR play.
    In Lubick’s defense, Pease recruited the current group of receivers. Fuller and Baciella have played well given their limited toolboxes. Ty Jones has so far been meh. Evaluators had him as a big HS talent, prone to mental lapses and taking plays off.

    I believe he closed Yankoff?

    Lubick may suck but I’m not ready to go there yet.

    Several thought Huff sucked, too. He’s demonstrated he can recruit the results from the development side—positive—recently kicked in.

    People were skeptical of the Huff hire. He immediately went to work and proved everyone wrong. Not really the same thing.
    How about Malloe then? Roundly panned and called for his firing. Now look where we are.
    Malloe proved that we are a bunch a fucking idiots
    Malloe showed that his inability on Tufele and Marlon were flukes. That's all.

    You fucking coach-trusters are retards.

    Also... with regards to Lubick... he got Yankoff, Trey and Culp last year. Ty, Alex, Terrell, Ozzy and Spiker were Hamdan.

    Listening to you retards talk hurts.
    Bitch, do you have a reading comprehension issues? Where did I say trust the coaches? I said he proved us wrong. He went out and proved it last year and this year he is just rubbing it in our faces. Don’t pretend like you did not want him hanged 2 years ago kkk style
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,472 Swaye's Wigwam

    Also, on Malloe- I've said this a million times but the evidence at the time was that he was a C recruiter at best. However the sample size was very small and it turns out Marlon and Coach Gino were just flukey situations like DDY says.

    That doesn't mean people agitating about Malloe's recruiting at the time were wrong. 90%+ of the time if your new coach doesn't land a big fish after 1.5 years on the job hes never going to. Unless you were in the living room on his in-home visits then you didn't have any better information at the time to say why the general rule didn't apply to Malloe and he was actually doing great work but getting unlucky.

    Don't be results oriented.

    Love it... until the last line. Isn’t everything results oriented? What am I missing?
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Also, on Malloe- I've said this a million times but the evidence at the time was that he was a C recruiter at best. However the sample size was very small and it turns out Marlon and Coach Gino were just flukey situations like DDY says.

    That doesn't mean people agitating about Malloe's recruiting at the time were wrong. 90%+ of the time if your new coach doesn't land a big fish after 1.5 years on the job hes never going to. Unless you were in the living room on his in-home visits then you didn't have any better information at the time to say why the general rule didn't apply to Malloe and he was actually doing great work but getting unlucky.

    Don't be results oriented.

    Love it... until the last line. Isn’t everything results oriented? What am I missing?
    Think of recruiting or any similar forecasting of future results like gambling. There is a lot of luck and unknowns.

    To use a poker analogy sometimes the three outer hits on the river that doesn't mean you were WRONG to put your money in with 93% equity.

    For some people thinking dispassionately like this is difficult so they disconnect from recruiting or any type of future prognostications entirely and come in to the forum just to point out in hindsight the 2* all american or 5* bust. These people aren't very smart though.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Also, on Malloe- I've said this a million times but the evidence at the time was that he was a C recruiter at best. However the sample size was very small and it turns out Marlon and Coach Gino were just flukey situations like DDY says.

    That doesn't mean people agitating about Malloe's recruiting at the time were wrong. 90%+ of the time if your new coach doesn't land a big fish after 1.5 years on the job hes never going to. Unless you were in the living room on his in-home visits then you didn't have any better information at the time to say why the general rule didn't apply to Malloe and he was actually doing great work but getting unlucky.

    Don't be results oriented.

    Isn't freaking out about a fluke situation with Marlon the definition of being results oriented?
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Also, on Malloe- I've said this a million times but the evidence at the time was that he was a C recruiter at best. However the sample size was very small and it turns out Marlon and Coach Gino were just flukey situations like DDY says.

    That doesn't mean people agitating about Malloe's recruiting at the time were wrong. 90%+ of the time if your new coach doesn't land a big fish after 1.5 years on the job hes never going to. Unless you were in the living room on his in-home visits then you didn't have any better information at the time to say why the general rule didn't apply to Malloe and he was actually doing great work but getting unlucky.

    Don't be results oriented.

    Isn't freaking out about a fluke situation with Marlon the definition of being results oriented?
    I think the key aspect is where we start from.

    Coaches are guilty until proven innocent. It has to be that way. If you are on THIS bored and don't get that, I don't know what to tell you.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Also, on Malloe- I've said this a million times but the evidence at the time was that he was a C recruiter at best. However the sample size was very small and it turns out Marlon and Coach Gino were just flukey situations like DDY says.

    That doesn't mean people agitating about Malloe's recruiting at the time were wrong. 90%+ of the time if your new coach doesn't land a big fish after 1.5 years on the job hes never going to. Unless you were in the living room on his in-home visits then you didn't have any better information at the time to say why the general rule didn't apply to Malloe and he was actually doing great work but getting unlucky.

    Don't be results oriented.

    Isn't freaking out about a fluke situation with Marlon the definition of being results oriented?
    I think the key aspect is where we start from.

    Coaches are guilty until proven innocent. It has to be that way. If you are on THIS bored and don't get that, I don't know what to tell you.
    That's a fine approach. But Troll is appealing to process > results, while defending a results related freakout.

    It can't be both.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,981 Swaye's Wigwam

    Baseman said:

    Interesting that Lubick is being sent with a babysitter (Hamdan) to visit Ford and McCoy this week. Over the weekend, Malloe chaperoned him on his visit with Puka. The only guy Lubick is seeing on his own is already-committed Taj Davis.

    Either Lubick is heading elsewhere next year or Pete doesn't trust him alone with recruits.

    I thought sending multiple coaches was common? I wouldn’t be shocked if Lubick isn’t here for long. We’ve had two years in a row of shitty WR play.
    In Lubick’s defense, Pease recruited the current group of receivers. Fuller and Baciella have played well given their limited toolboxes. Ty Jones has so far been meh. Evaluators had him as a big HS talent, prone to mental lapses and taking plays off.

    I believe he closed Yankoff?

    Lubick may suck but I’m not ready to go there yet.

    Several thought Huff sucked, too. He’s demonstrated he can recruit the results from the development side—positive—recently kicked in.

    People were skeptical of the Huff hire. He immediately went to work and proved everyone wrong. Not really the same thing.
    How about Malloe then? Roundly panned and called for his firing. Now look where we are.
    Malloe proved that we are a bunch a fucking idiots
    Malloe showed that his inability on Tufele and Marlon were flukes. That's all.

    You fucking coach-trusters are retards.

    Also... with regards to Lubick... he got Yankoff, Trey and Culp last year. Ty, Alex, Terrell, Ozzy and Spiker were Hamdan.

    Listening to you retards talk hurts.
    Just in the LIPO camp with Lubick. He had a couple of decent gets/assists however you want to count it which is why there's some evidence against the null. Current trend isn't good but i'm going to wait and see how he finishes the cycle for more evidence. Landing Ford would make me give him MOAr Tim which is all I'm going to give any coach who hasn't proved it THIS YEAR.
Sign In or Register to comment.