Kyle Ford, 4* 2019 WR, Anaheim (Servite), CA (Offered 5/21/17)
Comments
-
Maybe I choose my words wrong. I can't think of a higher rated game changing, polished, and potentially ready to play from go, receiver that we've landed under peterman.HillsboroDuck said:
"So I can't think of a WR of this level we've had under peterman."dirtysouwfdawg said:
I just mentioned PT, not the best player in the conference... is that you ballz?HillsboroDuck said:
John Ross was the best player in the conference in 2016, Ford has a ways to go before he gets to that level.dirtysouwfdawg said:
So I can't think of a WR of this level we've had under peterman. I don't think we have one currently on our roster either. If he has the playbook smarts, I could see PT next year. He is that good!Woof said:It may have been the Athletic article that said Ford will not go where Bru McCoy goes. That pretty much rules out USC. Everything I see from him points more toward UW than UO, with the lone exception being early PT.
His recruitment feels like Irvin's last year, where I was nervously optimistic about our chances for 3 months. History tells me to not expect good things in these situations, but I think we are probably favorites to land him.
He's much, much more refined coming in than Ross was though. But I'm hearing that adds nothing to his value.
Ross did not come in at the level as a freshmen that ford will be at as a freshmen. He would not redshirt at udub.
-
I don't disagree with any of thatdirtysouwfdawg said:
Maybe I choose my words wrong. I can't think of a higher rated game changing, polished, and potentially ready to play from go, receiver that we've landed under peterman.HillsboroDuck said:
"So I can't think of a WR of this level we've had under peterman."dirtysouwfdawg said:
I just mentioned PT, not the best player in the conference... is that you ballz?HillsboroDuck said:
John Ross was the best player in the conference in 2016, Ford has a ways to go before he gets to that level.dirtysouwfdawg said:
So I can't think of a WR of this level we've had under peterman. I don't think we have one currently on our roster either. If he has the playbook smarts, I could see PT next year. He is that good!Woof said:It may have been the Athletic article that said Ford will not go where Bru McCoy goes. That pretty much rules out USC. Everything I see from him points more toward UW than UO, with the lone exception being early PT.
His recruitment feels like Irvin's last year, where I was nervously optimistic about our chances for 3 months. History tells me to not expect good things in these situations, but I think we are probably favorites to land him.
He's much, much more refined coming in than Ross was though. But I'm hearing that adds nothing to his value.
Ross did not come in at the level as a freshmen that ford will be at as a freshmen. He would not redshirt at udub. -
Quite honestlyHillsboroDuck said:
I don't disagree with any of thatdirtysouwfdawg said:
Maybe I choose my words wrong. I can't think of a higher rated game changing, polished, and potentially ready to play from go, receiver that we've landed under peterman.HillsboroDuck said:
"So I can't think of a WR of this level we've had under peterman."dirtysouwfdawg said:
I just mentioned PT, not the best player in the conference... is that you ballz?HillsboroDuck said:
John Ross was the best player in the conference in 2016, Ford has a ways to go before he gets to that level.dirtysouwfdawg said:
So I can't think of a WR of this level we've had under peterman. I don't think we have one currently on our roster either. If he has the playbook smarts, I could see PT next year. He is that good!Woof said:It may have been the Athletic article that said Ford will not go where Bru McCoy goes. That pretty much rules out USC. Everything I see from him points more toward UW than UO, with the lone exception being early PT.
His recruitment feels like Irvin's last year, where I was nervously optimistic about our chances for 3 months. History tells me to not expect good things in these situations, but I think we are probably favorites to land him.
He's much, much more refined coming in than Ross was though. But I'm hearing that adds nothing to his value.
Ross did not come in at the level as a freshmen that ford will be at as a freshmen. He would not redshirt at udub. -
If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
Skinny coke Easongreenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
Who put up better stats in the SEC coked up as a freshmen.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Skinny coke Easongreenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
IT IS GLORIOUS!!!!!DoogCourics said: -
Jake Fucking Browning mother fucker!greenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
We?greenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
Wtf! "QB wasn't good this year but should be better next year", we were fucken saying that stupid shit every year the last 3 years with Jake Frowning. If you think Daniels will get it done at SC keep dreaming. The dawgs will play Skinny Fucken Eason and roll them Little Troys. Who ever the fuck we is doesn't know shit. Go Dawgs.greenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
-
Eason sucked as a freshman too.JustWinNow said:
Wtf! "QB wasn't good this year but should be better next year", we were fucken saying that stupid shit every year the last 3 years with Jake Frowning. If you think Daniels will get it done at SC keep dreaming. The dawgs will play Skinny Fucken Eason and roll them Little Troys. Who ever the fuck we is doesn't know shit. Go Dawgs.greenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
Hth -
Everyone sucks here I guess but for a true freshman he wasn't horrible
-
but did show sign of shatting himself when he was under pressure or when it mattered. he was just wildly inconsistent because he was freshmanHillsboroDuck said:
Eason sucked as a freshman too.JustWinNow said:
Wtf! "QB wasn't good this year but should be better next year", we were fucken saying that stupid shit every year the last 3 years with Jake Frowning. If you think Daniels will get it done at SC keep dreaming. The dawgs will play Skinny Fucken Eason and roll them Little Troys. Who ever the fuck we is doesn't know shit. Go Dawgs.greenblood said:
I'm leaning more to USC. It doesn't matter how much of a dumpster fire that school is at times, they almost always manage to get the Cali kids they want. Even with that I was leaning UW until USC hired Kliff. The air raid offense at a high profile school is a wr's wet dream. I think it's too much for Ford to pass up. USC will also have an experienced QB. He wasn't great this year, but he should improve. We really don't know who UW's QB will be next year.Crawfish said:
What team do you like more between USC and UW? Is UW like your second team?greenblood said:If Oregon had a chance with Ford, he would have visited this weekend. He isn’t, so it’s either USC or UW.
Hth -
Daniels was better, though he was playing in the 2018 Pac12 south which is even shittier than the SEC East of 2016.RaceBannon said:Everyone sucks here I guess but for a true freshman he wasn't horrible
-
I don't think JT sucks either and agree he is going to get better
Both need to get to 65% completion in today's game -
Hardly.HillsboroDuck said:
Daniels was better, though he was playing in the 2018 Pac12 south which is even shittier than the SEC East of 2016.RaceBannon said:Everyone sucks here I guess but for a true freshman he wasn't horrible
-
Hence "Eason sucked too".RaceBannon said:I don't think JT sucks either and agree he is going to get better
Both need to get to 65% completion in today's game
Both were bad. I expect both to get better.
-
Georgia also had a guy named Chubb in the backfield that year. Might have heard of him, he was ok in college.
-
Exactly ... the tea leaves have been saying thatanimate said:Ford has been quoted multiple times (chew on that) saying:
- he loves the coaches and gives reasons (details)
- he has lots of good friends on the team that tell him honest shit and he believes it
- he can definitely see him playing at UW (within interviews that he keeps info very superficial for other schools except for UW - devils in the details)
- he specifically touches upon Eason as "big arm and NFL bound" so he gives details about personnel and scheme. He does not do this for usc or Oregon IIRC.
- blah blah blah...
Point is that you read between the lines you can plainly see that he's a SoCal kid looking for a reason, for justification, to leave and go out of state.
That's not easy for many reasons. Family and friends. Emotional attachment and history.
We can't have it both ways where we expect croots to easily leave home and come to UW and for Washington kids (like smalls currently and fozzy previously) to stay home and spurn out of state schools.
Lastly, I pointed out a long time ago that a tuitele interview was almost identical to a ford one. Superficial niceties to all schools and then all of a sudden unprovoked details about UW. Surprise.
Ford may ultimately stay home but things definitely point to UW.
This also reminds me of a similar path that Irvin’s recruitment went down -
Plus Sony Michel. And no truly good upper classmen receivers... Isaac Nauta was their 3rd leading receiver as a true frosh TEJECAR said:Georgia also had a guy named Chubb in the backfield that year. Might have heard of him, he was ok in college.
-
So he should have been better than a 55% completion percentage with a dominant running game?JECAR said:Georgia also had a guy named Chubb in the backfield that year. Might have heard of him, he was ok in college.
AGREE -
Wow, and the best part is we have a whole other board to go ANALyze Eason’s freshman completion percentage!HillsboroDuck said:
So he should have been better than a 55% completion percentage with a dominant running game?JECAR said:Georgia also had a guy named Chubb in the backfield that year. Might have heard of him, he was ok in college.
AGREE -
Yeah, he probably should have been better. He didn’t really have to do that much though because his team was better than 2018 USC. I guess I look at Daniels numbers and think that he probably had more of an opportunity than Eason did.HillsboroDuck said:
So he should have been better than a 55% completion percentage with a dominant running game?JECAR said:Georgia also had a guy named Chubb in the backfield that year. Might have heard of him, he was ok in college.
AGREE -
I'm not looking at raw yardage if that's what you're talking about.JECAR said:
Yeah, he probably should have been better. He didn’t really have to do that much though because his team was better than 2018 USC. I guess I look at Daniels numbers and think that he probably had more of an opportunity than Eason did.HillsboroDuck said:
So he should have been better than a 55% completion percentage with a dominant running game?JECAR said:Georgia also had a guy named Chubb in the backfield that year. Might have heard of him, he was ok in college.
AGREE
Daniels had a better completion percentage, better yards per attempt and better passer rating.
The only thing Eason had better was TD:INT ratio (which isn't nothing).
But the point is less Daniels > Eason than it is talking shit about how good Eason is while going to be while saying "Daniels sucked so he's not going to get better" is completely asinine.
Both were highly rated. Both of them were bad as true freshman QB's. Both will probably greatly improve over their careers. -
JFC the fucken I love JT Daniels thread. Fuck him he sucks fuck USC they suck. That is the point! Stats are for fucken losers! We will win period I don't give a shit if Skinny is decimal points below him! Wtf! Any other fucken USC recruiting points you want to make for USC?
-
With the visit this weekend and the hire of Kingsbury plus his obvious like of USC I jsut find it hard to say we are winning this battle. Yes there are some tea leaves that make me cautiously optimistic but I just don't see how we win this battle. Feel free to bump me if I am wrong.
