UW should've won 10 games a year ago if not for self-inflicted bullshit and should be sitting at 6 wins right now. The standards for this program are so low it's ridiculous.
Edited 7 wins to 6 because I blacked out for the entire Stanford game.
We will still be yung and breaking in a qb in the tuff Pac12. On top of that Smith is still learning and he needs tyme. As long as we win 1 game a year I will be satisfied with the direction of our program.
We will still be yung and breaking in a qb in the tuff Pac12. On top of that Smith is still learning and he needs tyme. As long as we win 1 game a year I will be satisfied with the direction of our program.
PLSS, go back to forcefully invading the bung regions of you Boy Scout troop. LEAVE real football talk to us manly men ya boofcunt. Back to squeezin your fat body into mesh thigh highs and halter tops. Hit the streets Ru Puppy!
I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
Pretty much this ...
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the year
This. Its not even being an asshole either. We know how this shit works. Browning will get injured. Or maybe the defense has two or three injuries. No matter the case, there will be "context" for why Petersen only won 7 and why 2017 will be special.
Comments
#Bark4Sark
Edited 7 wins to 6 because I blacked out for the entire Stanford game.
Did I do that right?
in engrish: UW, Pete and jonny have a 4-win roster (because of youth not talent). That will change, so to your opinions on jonny smitts
Eight is too close to mediocrity with the WAC teams we play out of conference every year. Sark won eight...but it only gave me an 8-9 option...
Same argument: if Pete doesn't win 9 or 10 games next year and compete for the North then fire him at the 50.
But of course he won't be fired and then we can wait for this poll the next year.