How many games do OUR mighty DAWGS need to win next year
Comments
-
I'm already a Bama fan
Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the yearTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment. -
I'm already a Bama fanTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
mildly disappointed
how does the scale go?
slighty > mildly > somewhat > rather > strongly > severely > extremely > so fucking irritatingly? -
I'm already a Bama fan
Always go with ratherDardanus said:Tequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
mildly disappointed
how does the scale go?
slighty > mildly > somewhat > rather > strongly > severely > extremely > so fucking irritatingly? -
8-9Ross is back and that's 1 extra win. D will be top 10 in the country and Cobrah takes the offseason and gets better.
9 wins or GTFO Peterman -
10+10 or take a flying leap at a rolling donut asshole
-
10+I put 10 and will check back at the end of next season to see what the record was....because I sure as fuck ain't spending any actual money going to games with the Woody quality ball
-
or what?
-
0Have you seen the UW President?
-
8-9Need to sweep the ooc crap. I have a hard time imagining a scenario where 5-4 in conference looks to me like Petersen is building a winner here. but I won't rule it out. I think the 9+ answer is more realistic of my expectations as others have noted. 10+ wins should feel achievable as we play out next season.
-
He needs to win 7
