How many games do OUR mighty DAWGS need to win next year

PostGameOrangeSlices

for you to not become a Bama fan?

PurpleJ

I'm already a Bama fan

Go Buckeyes!

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

10+

My answer is probably 9+ but that wasn't an option.... I didn't want to get attached to 8.

ThomasFremont

I'm already a Bama fan

Roll Tide!

greenblood

6

Because 5 wasn't an option

RoadDawg55

8-9

8-4 (5-4).

pawz

10+

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

My answer is probably 9+ but that wasn't an option.... I didn't want to get attached to 8.

This.

RaceBannon

I'm already a Bama fan

Roll *Damn Tide

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

10+

I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.

Either way, it will be interesting, or not.

PurpleJ

I'm already a Bama fan

RaceBannon said:

Roll *Damn Tide

Role*

Tequilla

10+

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.

Either way, it will be interesting, or not.

Pretty much this ...

But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.

RaceBannon

I'm already a Bama fan

Tequilla said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.

Either way, it will be interesting, or not.

Pretty much this ...

But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.

Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the year

Dardanus

I'm already a Bama fan

Tequilla said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.

Either way, it will be interesting, or not.

Pretty much this ...

But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.

mildly disappointed

how does the scale go?
slighty > mildly > somewhat > rather > strongly > severely > extremely > so fucking irritatingly?

RaceBannon

I'm already a Bama fan

Dardanus said:

Tequilla said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.

Either way, it will be interesting, or not.

Pretty much this ...

But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.

mildly disappointed

how does the scale go?
slighty > mildly > somewhat > rather > strongly > severely > extremely > so fucking irritatingly?

Always go with rather

section_332

8-9

Ross is back and that's 1 extra win. D will be top 10 in the country and Cobrah takes the offseason and gets better.

9 wins or GTFO Peterman

Swaye

10+

10 or take a flying leap at a rolling donut asshole

Meek

10+

I put 10 and will check back at the end of next season to see what the record was....because I sure as fuck ain't spending any actual money going to games with the Woody quality ball

sarktastic

or what?

MisterEm

0

Have you seen the UW President?

Mad_Son

8-9

Need to sweep the ooc crap. I have a hard time imagining a scenario where 5-4 in conference looks to me like Petersen is building a winner here. but I won't rule it out. I think the 9+ answer is more realistic of my expectations as others have noted. 10+ wins should feel achievable as we play out next season.

puppylove_sugarsteel

He needs to win 7