How many games do OUR mighty DAWGS need to win next year
How many games do OUR mighty DAWGS need to win next year 88 votes
9 votes
4 votes
1 vote
3 votes
3 votes
19 votes
31 votes
5 votes
13 votes
Comments
-
I'm already a Bama fanGo Buckeyes!
-
10+My answer is probably 9+ but that wasn't an option.... I didn't want to get attached to 8.
-
I'm already a Bama fanRoll Tide!
-
6Because 5 wasn't an option
-
8-98-4 (5-4).
-
10+
This.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:My answer is probably 9+ but that wasn't an option.... I didn't want to get attached to 8.
-
I'm already a Bama fanRoll *Damn Tide
-
10+I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not. -
-
10+
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment. -
I'm already a Bama fan
Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the yearTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment. -
I'm already a Bama fanTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
mildly disappointed
how does the scale go?
slighty > mildly > somewhat > rather > strongly > severely > extremely > so fucking irritatingly? -
I'm already a Bama fan
Always go with ratherDardanus said:Tequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
mildly disappointed
how does the scale go?
slighty > mildly > somewhat > rather > strongly > severely > extremely > so fucking irritatingly? -
8-9Ross is back and that's 1 extra win. D will be top 10 in the country and Cobrah takes the offseason and gets better.
9 wins or GTFO Peterman -
10+10 or take a flying leap at a rolling donut asshole
-
10+I put 10 and will check back at the end of next season to see what the record was....because I sure as fuck ain't spending any actual money going to games with the Woody quality ball
-
or what?
-
0Have you seen the UW President?
-
8-9Need to sweep the ooc crap. I have a hard time imagining a scenario where 5-4 in conference looks to me like Petersen is building a winner here. but I won't rule it out. I think the 9+ answer is more realistic of my expectations as others have noted. 10+ wins should feel achievable as we play out next season.
-
He needs to win 7
-
1Pool Boy won't even make his seat warm unless he goes 0-for...
-
-
10+UW should've won 10 games a year ago if not for self-inflicted bullshit and should be sitting at 6 wins right now. The standards for this program are so low it's ridiculous.
Edited 7 wins to 6 because I blacked out for the entire Stanford game. -
Oh Tommy I love it when you waive your finger at me, hand on hip and flaming hostileThomasFremont said: -
8-9
*wavepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh Tommy I love it when you waive your finger at me, hand on hip and flaming hostileThomasFremont said: -
1We will still be yung and breaking in a qb in the tuff Pac12. On top of that Smith is still learning and he needs tyme. As long as we win 1 game a year I will be satisfied with the direction of our program.
-
*my brother typed it, spell check verified itPurpleBaze said:
*wavepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh Tommy I love it when you waive your finger at me, hand on hip and flaming hostileThomasFremont said: -
When?dongman said:We will still be yung and breaking in a qb in the tuff Pac12. On top of that Smith is still learning and he needs tyme. As long as we win 1 game a year I will be satisfied with the direction of our program.
-
I'm already a Bama fanMoar Eagle!
Did I do that right? -
1
Roll EagleSlocus said:Moar Eagle!
Did I do that right?
