Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How many games do OUR mighty DAWGS need to win next year
Comments
-
2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
-
I'm already a Bama fan
Things doogs saypuppylove_sugarsteel said:2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
-
8-9
I don't think anyone expected Browning to miss a couple of games. Gaskin and Victor were dinged up all year as well. Arizona and WSU were much better than expected. No shame in losing either of those games on the road.RaceBannon said:
Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the yearTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
I'm as disappointed as anyone about going 7-6, but it's not hard to see many positives. Almost everyone comes back next year. Jeff Tedford will be much better than Jonathon Smith. Petersen has shown he can make those kind of tough decisions. Nobody has been harder on Petersen or Smith than myself.
This is still a young team. Recruiting is going great. I know we all want to snap our fingers and win a Rose Bowl, but it doesn't work like that. I will say that Petersen should compete for the North next year. Anything less will be disappointing.
Think and care. Think and care. Think and care. Gloves off. Gloves off. Think and care. Think and care. Think and care. Gloves off. Gloves off. Think and care.
Think and care. Think and care. Think and care. Gloves off. Nobody was harder on Jonathon Smith. Think and care, think and care. Gloves are off. Thank you for showing us how to not act in 30 years. How is this Emmert's fault? Mark Emmert is a good president. I thought Sark was good until year 5. I suck Pete's soccer dad dick. -
0
So this is Washington's 15th exhibition season in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
I don't even know why they bother to have a football program. -
0RoadDawg55 said:
I don't think anyone expected Browning to miss a couple of games. Gaskin and Victor were dinged up all year as well. Arizona and WSU were much better than expected. No shame in losing either of those games on the road.RaceBannon said:
Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the yearTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment.
I'm as disappointed as anyone about going 7-6, but it's not hard to see many positives. Almost everyone comes back next year. Jeff Tedford will be much better than Jonathon Smith. Petersen has shown he can make those kind of tough decisions. Nobody has been harder on Petersen or Smith than myself.
This is still a young team. Recruiting is going great. I know we all want to snap our fingers and win a Rose Bowl, but it doesn't work like that. I will say that Petersen should compete for the North next year. Anything less will be disappointing.
Think and care. Think and care. Think and care. Gloves off. Gloves off. Think and care. Think and care. Think and care. Gloves off. Gloves off. Think and care.
Think and care. Think and care. Think and care. Gloves off. Nobody was harder on Jonathon Smith. Think and care, think and care. Gloves are off. Thank you for showing us how to not act in 30 years. How is this Emmert's fault? Mark Emmert is a good president. I thought Sark was good until year 5. I suck Pete's soccer dad dick.
-
I'm already a Bama fan
I don't think they doTierbsHsotBoobs said:
So this is Washington's 15th exhibition season in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
I don't even know why they bother to have a football program. -
0
And people wonder why we are Bama fans.RaceBannon said:
I don't think they doTierbsHsotBoobs said:
So this is Washington's 15th exhibition season in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
I don't even know why they bother to have a football program. -
8-9
In this case, it's probably trueRaceBannon said:
Things doogs saypuppylove_sugarsteel said:2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
-
10+10 or GTFO... Smith was already on the hot seat. He will get demoted to Qb tutor and and Tedford will take over by fall or Pete is FS
-
He'll win 11 in '17 so year 3 is a free pass. Anything over 9 is pac12 coach of year. This team was on 5 years probation under Sark boobius.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So this is Washington's 15th exhibition season in a row.puppylove_sugarsteel said:2, Pete's job is safe no matter what. Next?
I don't even know why they bother to have a football program.
