Looks like I am right again
Comments
-
This sounds like a pitch from Larry Scott.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah, and the first year in a new model (like streaming) is going to correlate to streaming numbers 10 years from now?AtomicDawg said:
It’s almost like viewership correlates with future tv deals and money that pours into the university.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I thought UW should LEAVE because they weren't going to get money.RaceBannon said:
This is fucking retarded and why the Pac sucksPostGameOrangeSlices said:
They already laugh at the Pac-12, who gives a shit?TheHB said:PAC-12 on Amazon.
And the nation laughs.
If we think the rest of the country is clueless about college football out west now, just wait until this happens. Fans in the west won’t even give a shit.
Besides the new order being an easier path to the new playoff system, I’m not seeing why UW shouldn’t do everything it can to go B1G.
Take the Amazon money AND fucking win a big game for once. None of us should give a shit about viewership....Fox thinks truck racing is more important
all the bigtime games will still be on fox or abc anyways
bunch of midwest loser dick suckers should root for fucking Minnesota
Stay here with your coogs and beavs
UW should go with the real football
Now, UW could get the money, but the viewership might dip for Colorado at Oregon State...
Looks like the goalposts are moving for the Midwest dick suckers.
Take the money, win the games, and win a fucking big bowl game for the first time in 20 years or DIAFF
Take the Amazon money now, watch the ratings plummet, profit.
What could possibly go wrong?
Jesus -
UW has had guys to win the big games. They did with James, they did with Rick, they did with Petersen.RaceBannon said:
The voices in your head broPostGameOrangeSlices said:Race really finds pleasure in being Ohio State's cornfed bitch
Stick to the coogs and the Pac 5
UW wants the big leagues so they can get the guys to win the big games
You're small time
Petersen's problem was that he didn't have the coaching aptitude to win against the big boys.
It's early for DeBoer, but it's looking promising so far.
Keep moving the goalposts dipshit. First it was the money. Oh wait, maybe the money will be there. Now lets move on to viewership in a new model that is literally in its inception.
Talk to me when Amazon throws in the towel on Thursday Night Football. I personally will not bet against Amazon when it comes to how they run their business. Go right ahead and try it, right after swallowing some cheese curd cum.
The current B1G is a fucking nightmare -
James
JFC
Speaking of ancient shit
The Pac 12 started sucking when Larry fucked the pooch last time on TV
I haven't moved any goalposts
The two best conferences don't give a shit about Amazon
If Amazon wanted to burn money it would be on them
Yeah two teams in the playoffs is a real nightmare you dumb fucking coog
-
This is all mute. When Paul Finebaum is proclaimimg that UW and Oregon are leaving then it's happening sooner rather than later.
Going into 2023 and still no TV deal. -
That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL -
And the P12 ?PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL -
Both suck. Its the SEC and everyone elseEwaDawg said:
And the P12 ?PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL -
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up. -
So the bet is that the brilliant business minds at Amazon will be successful marketing west coast college football to the nation.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW has had guys to win the big games. They did with James, they did with Rick, they did with Petersen.RaceBannon said:
The voices in your head broPostGameOrangeSlices said:Race really finds pleasure in being Ohio State's cornfed bitch
Stick to the coogs and the Pac 5
UW wants the big leagues so they can get the guys to win the big games
You're small time
Petersen's problem was that he didn't have the coaching aptitude to win against the big boys.
It's early for DeBoer, but it's looking promising so far.
Keep moving the goalposts dipshit. First it was the money. Oh wait, maybe the money will be there. Now lets move on to viewership in a new model that is literally in its inception.
Talk to me when Amazon throws in the towel on Thursday Night Football. I personally will not bet against Amazon when it comes to how they run their business. Go right ahead and try it, right after swallowing some cheese curd cum.
The current B1G is a fucking nightmare
Because everything Amazon does turns to gold. (Good luck with that.)
Washington shouldn’t be a guinea pig in this experiment. -
I feel like Larry Scott's entire vision was around owning all the content and moving into streaming because more people have cell phones than cable.
Maybe it was bad luck with SC taking a shit and chipster/Harbaugh not getting over the hump, but a big part of the demise of the PAC happened by putting ourselves on an island.
It backfired bigly. ESPN had no reason to hype us, half the sports bars didn't carry it (no directtv!), and the stars left more and more.
Whatever happens, it needs to be integrated with what everyone else is doing or we'll just be playing in a shadow. -
The flipping back and forth between games is a huge component. Can you imagine calling into a bar to see if they're streaming Amazon on TV to watch the Huskies play San Diego State?
There's probably a middle ground somewhere, but the last streaming visionary (Larry Scott) just got laughed out of town. You might be right eventually, but like California demanding you drive a tesla by 2030 you're probably jumping the gun. -
Ill root for my DAWGS no matter what.
Wuff! -
Races coked out frat boy argument has some good points but I definitely don't think the PAC 10 is in a position to directly compete against the P2. The PAC will have to be creative if it wants to make more money.
The issue is that Race is assuming jumping ship and joining the B1G is risk free. Why do we think Clemson hasn't joined the SEC? Is it possible they don't need a few extra million when they can run the ACC as is? They got natties with pennies in a worse league than the PAC.
Keep screaming alpha male nonsense. Maybe we can be Nebraska west. -
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up. -
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up. -
Thought they were 2001. Was that Miami?dnc said:
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up.
Butt still...lets not act like the B1G is some juggernaut. They struggle. -
Definitely hate the B1G.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Thought they were 2001. Was that Miami?dnc said:
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up.
Butt still...lets not act like the B1G is some juggernaut. They struggle.
But die Utah/Cuog/Beav, fucking die... -
2000 we beat MiamiPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Thought they were 2001. Was that Miami?dnc said:
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up.
Butt still...lets not act like the B1G is some juggernaut. They struggle.
2001 nobody beat Miami
2002 tOSU beat Miami in the natty
I think they won something like 32 straight games and had one ring to show for it thanks to the schools Lincoln Keinholz's committed to.
@creepycoug -
Even gramps knows you can stream college football on networks on any device. You don't need to bury your product to do so on an app
This is UWCanadawg said:Races coked out frat boy argument has some good points but I definitely don't think the PAC 10 is in a position to directly compete against the P2. The PAC will have to be creative if it wants to make more money.
The issue is that Race is assuming jumping ship and joining the B1G is risk free. Why do we think Clemson hasn't joined the SEC? Is it possible they don't need a few extra million when they can run the ACC as is? They got natties with pennies in a worse league than the PAC.
Keep screaming alpha male nonsense. Maybe we can be Nebraska west.
Soft fucking losers
Larry Scott already tried to be innovative and killed the conference
Leave or die with it you bunch of pussies
There have always been coogs here trashing the SEC and B1G while pimping this loser Pac 12. Why We Suck -
PI my ass.dnc said:
2000 we beat MiamiPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Thought they were 2001. Was that Miami?dnc said:
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up.
Butt still...lets not act like the B1G is some juggernaut. They struggle.
2001 nobody beat Miami
2002 tOSU beat Miami in the natty
I think they won something like 32 straight games and had one ring to show for it thanks to the schools Lincoln Keinholz's committed to.
@creepycoug -
Just take a higher percentage from the PAC and run the West
-
If the Pac gets an auto bid and UW gets a high enough percentage to be in the ballpark with the B1G, maybe.Canadawg said:Just take a higher percentage from the PAC and run the West
But the other schools are fucking retarded, like Utah, and think they deserve an equal share.
Plus, if (when) UW goes to the B1G they get to play both the LA schools every year like how it fucking should be. This play Arizona and Colorado and get SC twice a decade stuff is fucking bullshit. Fuck this conference. -
Agreed. The fact that Furd and Cal got to play the LA schools every year was an atrocity in hindsight. What were they going to do, go independent?haie said:
If the Pac gets an auto bid and UW gets a high enough percentage to be in the ballpark with the B1G, maybe.Canadawg said:Just take a higher percentage from the PAC and run the West
But the other schools are fucking retarded, like Utah, and think they deserve an equal share.
Plus, if (when) UW goes to the B1G they get to play both the LA schools every year like how it fucking should be. This play Arizona and Colorado and get SC twice a decade stuff is fucking bullshit. Fuck this conference. -
If Amazon wants a sports channel on TV, the Pac-12 has all the infrastructure to do that, especially since the Pac-12 can do multiple sports simultaneously
Getting people on Prime is good, but if they want to disrupt the market and play with FOX or ESPN, they'll need to get in the ring with them on TV
Amazon went big getting a piece of the NFL, so we know they're interested. They're not starting with something like Omega Ball, and I imagine they want in all the major US sports within 5 years -
Is that what they are calling in these days?creepycoug said:
PI my ass.dnc said:
2000 we beat MiamiPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Thought they were 2001. Was that Miami?dnc said:
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up.
Butt still...lets not act like the B1G is some juggernaut. They struggle.
2001 nobody beat Miami
2002 tOSU beat Miami in the natty
I think they won something like 32 straight games and had one ring to show for it thanks to the schools Lincoln Keinholz's committed to.
@creepycoug -
YesEwaDawg said:
Is that what they are calling in these days?creepycoug said:
PI my ass.dnc said:
2000 we beat MiamiPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Thought they were 2001. Was that Miami?dnc said:
2002 Ohio StatePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Who was the other champ besides 2014 Ohio State??dnc said:
They have two of the past 20 champions and a representative in this year's title game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:That dumbass B1G team couldn't even beat TCU
The B1G has won 1 title in 20 fucking years
Fuck off loser LOL
The Pac has one or two titles in that time frame depending on what you consider a title. And both of those are headed to the B1G.
So the new B1G will have 20-25% of the past 20 titles. The Pac will have 0% of them.
I see why you brought this up.
Butt still...lets not act like the B1G is some juggernaut. They struggle.
2001 nobody beat Miami
2002 tOSU beat Miami in the natty
I think they won something like 32 straight games and had one ring to show for it thanks to the schools Lincoln Keinholz's committed to.
@creepycoug -
I'm always willing to take the gloves off against Gramps Race ... except when he's right
The Prime numbers this year for the NFL are disastrous ... you can come up with a number of reasons for that ranging from Amazon getting a lot of really crappy Thursday games this year combined with one of the biggest challenges of watching sports on Prime being that you can't flip around channels (something the streaming people haven't caught onto how ingrained people are with this when it comes to watching sports). For Amazon, I suspect that they are able to rationalize the deal with lower levels of infrastructure vs a network and the upsell to Prime that they are getting with new subscribers and eventually as they uptick the annual cost of Prime by $10-20/yr per subscriber.
What should be terrifying to any P10 member school with a potential Amazon deal is YoY viewership decline for what is generally considered a "must watch" weekly event in the NFL. Those % declines for the NFL will only be worse for the P10. It's really hard to rationally argue around it.
While it may be a short-term money maker for the schools involved, it's going to further erode the brand and reputation of the P12 schools. Moreover, with no tie ins to any of the major national networks, you're almost assuredly going to be out of sight and out of mind in any of the national conversation, highlights, etc.
My personal opinion is that the P10 will never sign another media rights deal ... my projections are as follows:
Big12 comes in and aggressively tries to round their conference out to 16 programs ... the Corner schools will see the Big 12 as offering comparable money and additional stability that the P10 can't offer because ...
Everybody knows that UW and Oregon are off to the Big 10 as soon as they get an invite (timing of which is TBD) ...
Assuming the Corner schools act first, could see both UW and Oregon contemplate independence for a few years until the Big10 eventually comes calling ... an added benefit by going independent is being able to sell the value of the program as a national brand (would require playing more of a national schedule - net net that's a positive for UW all the way around) ...
Corner schools leaving first will limit any noise around UW or Oregon leaving behind their in-state rivals ...
I would expect that Oregon St and Wazzu in such a scenario would look towards joining up with the Mountain West for probably all other sports but football while perhaps trying to play the independent game to buy time ...
Cal and Stanford have long-term decisions to make regarding their role in college sports and I could completely see them bowing out of the high end of football game
There's really no value in the P10 remaining as one conference as there just aren't programs and rivalries that resonate nationally with the exception of a few games ...
It all just comes down to which school(s) bail first -
1
Will the Marvelous Mrs. Maisel be doing any sideline reporting for Prime Pac after dark?
Her perkies are legit.
-
Read itTequilla said:I'm always willing to take the gloves off against Gramps Race ... except when he's right
The Prime numbers this year for the NFL are disastrous ... you can come up with a number of reasons for that ranging from Amazon getting a lot of really crappy Thursday games this year combined with one of the biggest challenges of watching sports on Prime being that you can't flip around channels (something the streaming people haven't caught onto how ingrained people are with this when it comes to watching sports). For Amazon, I suspect that they are able to rationalize the deal with lower levels of infrastructure vs a network and the upsell to Prime that they are getting with new subscribers and eventually as they uptick the annual cost of Prime by $10-20/yr per subscriber.
What should be terrifying to any P10 member school with a potential Amazon deal is YoY viewership decline for what is generally considered a "must watch" weekly event in the NFL. Those % declines for the NFL will only be worse for the P10. It's really hard to rationally argue around it.
While it may be a short-term money maker for the schools involved, it's going to further erode the brand and reputation of the P12 schools. Moreover, with no tie ins to any of the major national networks, you're almost assuredly going to be out of sight and out of mind in any of the national conversation, highlights, etc.
My personal opinion is that the P10 will never sign another media rights deal ... my projections are as follows:
Big12 comes in and aggressively tries to round their conference out to 16 programs ... the Corner schools will see the Big 12 as offering comparable money and additional stability that the P10 can't offer because ...
Everybody knows that UW and Oregon are off to the Big 10 as soon as they get an invite (timing of which is TBD) ...
Assuming the Corner schools act first, could see both UW and Oregon contemplate independence for a few years until the Big10 eventually comes calling ... an added benefit by going independent is being able to sell the value of the program as a national brand (would require playing more of a national schedule - net net that's a positive for UW all the way around) ...
Corner schools leaving first will limit any noise around UW or Oregon leaving behind their in-state rivals ...
I would expect that Oregon St and Wazzu in such a scenario would look towards joining up with the Mountain West for probably all other sports but football while perhaps trying to play the independent game to buy time ...
Cal and Stanford have long-term decisions to make regarding their role in college sports and I could completely see them bowing out of the high end of football game
There's really no value in the P10 remaining as one conference as there just aren't programs and rivalries that resonate nationally with the exception of a few games ...
It all just comes down to which school(s) bail first
Gloves still on
@Tequilla gets it
-
What should be terrifying to any P10 member school with a potential Amazon deal is YoY viewership decline for what is generally considered a "must watch" weekly event in the NFL. Those % declines for the NFL will only be worse for the P10. It's really hard to rationally argue around it.
If it is a great deal the SEC would have done it. You have to assume the Pac was third choice at best for Amazon and they won't need to over pay
The TV idea mentioned is of interest but keeping the Pac isn't
