So ignoring some of the extremely unlikely scenarios where teams get upset by scrubs:
UCLA needs to beat USC no matter what Oregon needs to lose either game (can't win out) UW needs to win out
At that point its (in all likelihood) going to be either USC or Utah (no situation we play anyone else)
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.... Go bruins I guess, probably worth watching the 1.5 spread usc/ucla game live, and recording the 31.5 spread uw/colorado game to watch later or watch highlights or whatever the fuck
So ignoring some of the extremely unlikely scenarios where teams get upset by scrubs:
UCLA needs to beat USC no matter what Oregon needs to lose either game (can't win out) UW needs to win out
At that point its (in all likelihood) going to be either USC or Utah (no situation we play anyone else)
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.... Go bruins I guess, probably worth watching the 1.5 spread usc/ucla game live, and recording the 31.5 spread uw/colorado game to watch later or watch highlights or whatever the fuck
If you toss out the possibility of Colorado beating Utah, then the only team UW would play is Utah. And yeah, it can only happen with UCLA beating USC, UW winning out and Oregon losing a game.
So ignoring some of the extremely unlikely scenarios where teams get upset by scrubs:
UCLA needs to beat USC no matter what Oregon needs to lose either game (can't win out) UW needs to win out
At that point its (in all likelihood) going to be either USC or Utah (no situation we play anyone else)
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.... Go bruins I guess, probably worth watching the 1.5 spread usc/ucla game live, and recording the 31.5 spread uw/colorado game to watch later or watch highlights or whatever the fuck
If you toss out the possibility of Colorado beating Utah, then the only team UW would play is Utah. And yeah, it can only happen with UCLA beating USC, UW winning out and Oregon losing a game.
We can only play USC (replacing Oregon as the #2 seed), the two threads of results we need are both unlikely to happen.
I’m not the guy who made @TheChart but according to @TheChart, we’re much more likely to play Utah (3 possible scenarios) than USC (2 scenarios, at least 1 or both of which includes Colorado beating Utah).
So ignoring some of the extremely unlikely scenarios where teams get upset by scrubs:
UCLA needs to beat USC no matter what Oregon needs to lose either game (can't win out) UW needs to win out
At that point its (in all likelihood) going to be either USC or Utah (no situation we play anyone else)
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.... Go bruins I guess, probably worth watching the 1.5 spread usc/ucla game live, and recording the 31.5 spread uw/colorado game to watch later or watch highlights or whatever the fuck
If you toss out the possibility of Colorado beating Utah, then the only team UW would play is Utah. And yeah, it can only happen with UCLA beating USC, UW winning out and Oregon losing a game.
With Nix's injury status up in the air, playing utah and then on the road at OSU is a tough draw, I'd honestly be surprised if they don't lose one.
Not sure what to think about ucla/usc though, I'm leaning towards usc winning, but it wouldn't surprise me if ucla slides through.
Fucking arizona, shouldn't have to have our fate in other people's hands this year.
We can only play USC (replacing Oregon as the #2 seed), the two threads of results we need are both unlikely to happen.
What did the chart get wrong to where we couldn't play Utah? Not being facetious, I'm genuinely curious.
Ugh, I thought it was common knowledge that we need beavlet to win out, UCLA to lose out, and Oregon to beat Utah (and obviously lose to beavlet). The alternate thread is Colorado beats Utah which isn't happening.
So it looked like SC against UW in 1 scenario was all that was possible. Then again it's Twitter.
We can only play USC (replacing Oregon as the #2 seed), the two threads of results we need are both unlikely to happen.
What did the chart get wrong to where we couldn't play Utah? Not being facetious, I'm genuinely curious.
Ugh, I thought it was common knowledge that we need beavlet to win out, UCLA to lose out, and Oregon to beat Utah (and obviously lose to beavlet). The alternate thread is Colorado beats Utah which isn't happening.
So it looked like SC against UW in 1 scenario was all that was possible. Then again it's Twitter.
We can only play USC (replacing Oregon as the #2 seed), the two threads of results we need are both unlikely to happen.
What did the chart get wrong to where we couldn't play Utah? Not being facetious, I'm genuinely curious.
Ugh, I thought it was common knowledge that we need beavlet to win out, UCLA to lose out, and Oregon to beat Utah (and obviously lose to beavlet). The alternate thread is Colorado beats Utah which isn't happening.
So it looked like SC against UW in 1 scenario was all that was possible. Then again it's Twitter.
Yeah, after looking at the decision tree of dreck that is the result of UW dropping two road games in a row, FTX U needs to beat UCLA. However if UCLA loses this weekend they might not care and quit on Chip.
Comments
If USC loses, Oregon needs to lose to either Ute or OSU for us to get in to play Ute
UCLA needs to beat USC no matter what
Oregon needs to lose either game (can't win out)
UW needs to win out
At that point its (in all likelihood) going to be either USC or Utah (no situation we play anyone else)
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.... Go bruins I guess, probably worth watching the 1.5 spread usc/ucla game live, and recording the 31.5 spread uw/colorado game to watch later or watch highlights or whatever the fuck
Not sure what to think about ucla/usc though, I'm leaning towards usc winning, but it wouldn't surprise me if ucla slides through.
Fucking arizona, shouldn't have to have our fate in other people's hands this year.
So it looked like SC against UW in 1 scenario was all that was possible. Then again it's Twitter.
how does UW not get in, in that scenario???