This ones going to be hard for some of you to answer
Comments
-
That sounds a lot like beat Oregon nothing else matters.Baseman said:
Unless you win the final playoff game it’s a down year.MikeSeaver said:And I’m already expecting vitriol and insults as per the usual around here so you can do that or stick to the subject. Either way is fine with me.
When Pete loses your bowl game again this year, should he be fired? Or, is this a new Washington where just getting there is good enough?
We’d be talking about 5 years with only a heart of Dallas Bowl Trophy, under his belt.
Despite the talent and experience, our? QB and sub playoff level talent sprinkled in amongst the starters, suggests us? winning the big one ain’t going to happen.
If we? win the conference, make the playoffs, and dump the opening round, Pete’s not going anywhere and I’ll reluctantly sign for another year.
Question for you Is a Heisman winner and a one time semi final victory satisfying enough to stomach two subsequent years of sodomy from your long time bitch?
Listen, up until like 8 years ago, the Oregon Ducks football team hadn’t won a Rose Bowl in 100 years. I saw them win two with mine own eyes right in front of me, skipped a fiesta bowl because it wasn’t a big deal and watched them play in two college football finals, one of which I attended.
This is the Oregon Ducks I’m talking about.
If you think losing to Washington a couple times in 20 years has me all wound up, you are severely mistaken.
I’m pretty good for a bit right now.
You?
-
It was a yes or no answer but thanks for the explanation.MikeSeaver said:
That sounds a lot like beat Oregon nothing else matters.Baseman said:
Unless you win the final playoff game it’s a down year.MikeSeaver said:And I’m already expecting vitriol and insults as per the usual around here so you can do that or stick to the subject. Either way is fine with me.
When Pete loses your bowl game again this year, should he be fired? Or, is this a new Washington where just getting there is good enough?
We’d be talking about 5 years with only a heart of Dallas Bowl Trophy, under his belt.
Despite the talent and experience, our? QB and sub playoff level talent sprinkled in amongst the starters, suggests us? winning the big one ain’t going to happen.
If we? win the conference, make the playoffs, and dump the opening round, Pete’s not going anywhere and I’ll reluctantly sign for another year.
Question for you Is a Heisman winner and a one time semi final victory satisfying enough to stomach two subsequent years of sodomy from your long time bitch?
Listen, up until like 8 years ago, the Oregon Ducks football team hadn’t won a Rose Bowl in 100 years. I saw them win two with mine own eyes right in front of me, skipped a fiesta bowl because it wasn’t a big deal and watched them play in two college football finals, one of which I attended.
This is the Oregon Ducks I’m talking about.
If you think losing to Washington a couple times in 20 years has me all wound up, you are severely mistaken.
I’m pretty good for a bit right now.
You? -
Petersen will get the rich brooks patented 17 years to lose a rosebowl promise from the fanbase
-
MikeSeaver said:
How exactly should I ask the question? God this place is weird.DerekJohnson said:
You're trolling and even pressing. But there is a hint of validity to what you're saying about Pete and UW standards.MikeSeaver said:As suspected.
Very predictable and the main reason I don’t post here very much.
-
You are in mid-season form. Been working out?MikeSeaver said:And I’m already expecting vitriol and insults as per the usual around here so you can do that or stick to the subject. Either way is fine with me.
When Pete loses your bowl game again this year, should he be fired? Or, is this a new Washington where just getting there is good enough?
We’d be talking about 5 years with only a heart of Dallas Bowl Trophy, under his belt.
#threadviewsbitch
#isaidimnotemotional! -
i'm no fan of Emotional-Mike Seaver. but he just kind of handed you your ass on this poont. It's like you didn't get it.BaldwinIV said:
you feasted on UW during a time the UW's own AD actively tried to kill it. and it hired gilbinghamsark. don't give me any whiny shit about UO getting assrailed while down. that was what happened for 95% of the streak. you and yours didn't buy it from UW and we certainly aren't buying it from youMikeSeaver said:
Oh please, you were bad for like 18 years. Oregon’s was in the championship game like 3 yeas ago.BaldwinIV said:
funny how that worksMikeSeaver said:
Luckily it coincided with the worst Oregon teams in almost a generation.RaceBannon said:
And I was about to give a serious answer but then this........MikeSeaver said:As suspected.
Very predictable and the main reason I don’t post here very much.
If you lurked around a bit you'd know there have been hundreds of posts on the failures against Bama and PSU and concern about recruiting being good enough to win those games going forward. Would we care if it happens again? Hell yes
Should he be fired? Let's not be stupid here
or that you think you need to preach that to UW fans of all programs
So far only race bannon has even tried to answer the question. Again, not surprised.
-
well, that depends on which program you're talking about.MikeSeaver said:
Good post. Great poster.RaceBannon said:
He's going into his 5th year. No, winning the north isn't enough. And the whole down Oregon thing is meaningless.MikeSeaver said:
This is the Ducks FANS forum. Why would I go to any of he other ones? It’s exactly why I asked why we had this new forum as it’s so narrow in scope. Again I trust the moderators have a plan so I’m fine with that. For now. Personal opinion I like one big forum with all topics. Who wants to go clicking around looking for the perfect sub forum to post their thoughts?RaceBannon said:
And I was about to give a serious answer but then this........MikeSeaver said:As suspected.
Very predictable and the main reason I don’t post here very much.
If you lurked around a bit you'd know there have been hundreds of posts on the failures against Bama and PSU and concern about recruiting being good enough to win those games going forward. Would we care if it happens again? Hell yes
Should he be fired? Let's not be stupid here
Back to the topic, seems like you wouldn’t want him around just winning Northern titles. Wouldn’t have been good enough for the Washington I grew up watching.
It may be now, though. Certainly seems like it. Luckily it coincided with the worst Oregon teams in almost a generation. Because otherwise I think you’d be singing a different tune.
He is what his record is. Losing to Stanford last year was his worse loss. The UW I grew up watching didn't win every game or win the league every year. Go through the shit pile of coaches that we have and we'll appreciate Pete until we don't
That's a serious answer
I think you’ll be disappointed in the long run with his guy though. How long should it take to get a program up and running to be dominate?
6 years? 7?
resurrecting Washington is not like resurrecting Alabama. it's harder because it's not quite the national name and its recruiting base, while arguably underrated, is far from enviable. slightly easier than resurrecting Oregon; a few clicks harder than resurrecting LSU.
Miami has not been a serious contender in 15 years, and that recruiting base is as good as it gets, and it has all manner of national name recognition and a great trophy room. And still. It's hard.
I really can't see how anyone, no matter how much you might wish it, can with a straight face argue that Pete isn't a really really good, and arguably great, coach. But he does have some blind spots with OKG, which could hold him back. I'll grant you that.
Making Washington into a world-beater is not as automatic as you make it out to be. -
MikeSeaver said:
Guess we should have lost on purpose a few times to make it legit. Great take.BaldwinIV said:
you feasted on UW during a time the UW's own AD actively tried to kill it. and it hired gilbinghamsark. don't give me any whiny shit about UO getting assrailed while down. that was what happened for 95% of the streak. you and yours didn't buy it from UW and we certainly aren't buying it from youMikeSeaver said:
Oh please, you were bad for like 18 years. Oregon’s was in the championship game like 3 yeas ago.BaldwinIV said:
funny how that worksMikeSeaver said:
Luckily it coincided with the worst Oregon teams in almost a generation.RaceBannon said:
And I was about to give a serious answer but then this........MikeSeaver said:As suspected.
Very predictable and the main reason I don’t post here very much.
If you lurked around a bit you'd know there have been hundreds of posts on the failures against Bama and PSU and concern about recruiting being good enough to win those games going forward. Would we care if it happens again? Hell yes
Should he be fired? Let's not be stupid here
or that you think you need to preach that to UW fans of all programs
So far only race bannon has even tried to answer the question. Again, not surprised.
Still won’t answer the question.
By the way I’m leaving in a bit to meet friends for drinks so I won’t be in here all night. Can one of you at least answer the fucking question and not make it about Oregon... for once? Unless that’s your aspiration which is accepatable if that’s the level you’re happy with.
Awesome!
-
It's just a matter of time until UW and Petersen start winning big bowl games. As every new Freshman class is added to the roster the talent level and quality depth Pete has to work with gets better and better. Soon there won't be a team in the nation with an obvious talent advantage over UW and that's when I expect UW to start winning their bowl games against top-10 or top-5 teams.
However, it's strange to me that a quook would even bring up this topic. You talk about winning big bowl games as if that's something Oregon is doing right now. Oregon lost their bowl game in embarrassing fashion to Boise State. The Chip Kelly/Mariota era might as well be 20 years ago because that's how far away Oregon is from being able to beat a team like Alabama or Penn State. Now who's living in the past? -
WrongStrongArmCobra said:It's just a matter of time until UW and Petersen start winning big bowl games. As every new Freshman class is added to the roster the talent level and quality depth Pete has to work with gets better and better. Soon there won't be a team in the nation with an obvious talent advantage over UW and that's when I expect UW to start winning their bowl games against top-10 or top-5 teams.
However, it's strange to me that a quook would even bring up this topic. You talk about winning big bowl games as if that's something Oregon is doing right now. Oregon lost their bowl game in embarrassing fashion to Boise State. The Chip Kelly/Mariota era might as well be 20 years ago because that's how far away Oregon is from being able to beat a team like Alabama or Penn State. Now who's living in the past?
USC will always have a massive talent advantage in the pac alone
