Oregon fans would give their left nuts to have Petersen as Ducks coach. And so would the women.
Keep telling yourself that. The premiere program of the PAC 12 doesn't have time to waste on good regional coaches who can win games but not the important ones. We already have an ace recruiter in Cristobal. He so good he could flip families of lifelong doogs into flaming quooks literally overnight after selling their sons on Oregon. These kids grew up under the shadow of the duck empire's wingspan and get that UW should be viewed as a placeholder program for when Oregon and Stanford are down. That, and the fact that he's so stubborn he would start Jake Browning for another 4 years if he could.
Oregon fans would give their left nuts to have Petersen as Ducks coach. And so would the women.
Keep telling yourself that. The premiere program of the PAC 12 doesn't have time to waste time on good regional coaches who can win games but not the important ones. We already have an ace recruiter in Cristobal. He so good he could flip families of lifelong doogs into flaming quooks literally overnight after selling their sons on Oregon. These kids grew up under the shadow of the duck empire's wingspan and get that UW should be viewed as a placeholder program for when Oregon and Stanford are down. That, and the fact that he's so stubborn he would start Jake Browning for another 8 years if he could.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
“Did Bellotti ever have to Face a Clay Helton led USC? I didn’t think so.”
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
Sorry, forgot to say that I said he’s 1 game better than Bellotti, tops.
If Bellotti wins one more game a season here and there he would have won the conf a couple more times.
Mike lost a ton of bowl games too. Especially to good teams.
That is not me backing Mediocre Mike, and it’s not me saying he should have won a couple more... that’s me duck splaing to you who Peterson is.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
“Did Bellotti ever have to Face a Clay Helton led USC? I didn’t think so.”
This conference. Ha ha ha.
John Robinson Round Two and Paul Hackett say hi.
Or to put them on equal terms, in Bellotti's first four years at Oregon USC won the conference (actually tied for it) once. They finished ranked once (12th). Bellotti won the conference zero out of four times.
In Pete's first four years at Washington USC won the conference once (outright). They finished ranked three times (20th, 3rd, 12th). Pete won the conference one out of four times.
Clearly a down USC is the source of Pete's comparative strength.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
Sorry, forgot to say that I said he’s 1 game better than Bellotti, tops.
If Bellotti wins one more game a season here and there he would have won the conf a couple more times.
Mike lost a ton of bowl games too. Especially to good teams.
That is not me backing Mediocre Mike, and it’s not me saying he should have won a couple more... that’s me duck splaing to you who Peterson is.
Make's fun of doogs for comparing Cristoball to Sark
Here's an ever harder question for Duck fans to answer:
If winning a national championship was so much easier before the BCS and CFB Playoff era, how come Oregon didn't win any?
Oregon sucked at football for 100 years. The vast majority of that was before any of us were born so who gives a fuck? Pretty sure that’s been established. What’s that got to do with Peterson winning anything now?
You ask a great question though, had anyone on this board ever made that claim about any of it being easy. We all know “it’s hard”
That said, you have to win two games against top 4 teams to win it now instead of waiting for the assistant athletic directors and USA Today columnists to vote based on highlights from ESPN or reading the newspaper game write ups in 1958.
You’re getting pretty far off track now. Try sticking to the subject.
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
Sorry, forgot to say that I said he’s 1 game better than Bellotti, tops.
If Bellotti wins one more game a season here and there he would have won the conf a couple more times.
Mike lost a ton of bowl games too. Especially to good teams.
That is not me backing Mediocre Mike, and it’s not me saying he should have won a couple more... that’s me duck splaing to you who Peterson is.
Make's fun of doogs for comparing Cristoball to Sark
Equates Petermen to Bellotti.
You’re right. Bellotti actually won a BCS game at Oregon. Even though those don’t count anymore or something?
Losing bigger games in 2018 > winning them in the past.
Love watching you all screw yourselves into the ground with all of the twisting. Spending 15 years saying one thing then having to change your entire foundation in 2 is quite a tasty treat.
3 years tells you who you are Win or GTFO Seamen covered monitors when Oregon lost to standford every other year or twice in the final.
Now you wouldn’t trade losing to Alabama for a Rose Bowl victory over Ped State (which you could have corrected the next year but didn’t)
I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
YRYK
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
“Did Bellotti ever have to Face a Clay Helton led USC? I didn’t think so.”
This conference. Ha ha ha.
John Robinson Round Two and Paul Hackett say hi.
Or to put them on equal terms, in Bellotti's first four years at Oregon USC won the conference (actually tied for it) once. They finished ranked once (12th). Bellotti won the conference zero out of four times.
In Pete's first four years at Washington USC won the conference once (outright). They finished ranked three times (20th, 3rd, 12th). Pete won the conference one out of four times.
Clearly a down USC is the source of Pete's comparative strength.
Comments
He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.
Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.
Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.
Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.
Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.
So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
This conference. Ha ha ha.
If Bellotti wins one more game a season here and there he would have won the conf a couple more times.
Mike lost a ton of bowl games too. Especially to good teams.
That is not me backing Mediocre Mike, and it’s not me saying he should have won a couple more... that’s me duck splaing to you who Peterson is.
Or to put them on equal terms, in Bellotti's first four years at Oregon USC won the conference (actually tied for it) once. They finished ranked once (12th). Bellotti won the conference zero out of four times.
In Pete's first four years at Washington USC won the conference once (outright). They finished ranked three times (20th, 3rd, 12th). Pete won the conference one out of four times.
Clearly a down USC is the source of Pete's comparative strength.
Bellotti wins again!
Equates Petermen to Bellotti.
First four years Bellotti was 17-15 in conference. Pete is 23-13.
One win a year better at tops!
And remember, poor Mike only inherited a conference champion while lucky Pete inherited a sixth place team.
I stand by it
If winning a national championship was so much easier before the BCS and CFB Playoff era, how come Oregon didn't win any?
You ask a great question though, had anyone on this board ever made that claim about any of it being easy. We all know “it’s hard”
That said, you have to win two games against top 4 teams to win it now instead of waiting for the assistant athletic directors and USA Today columnists to vote based on highlights from ESPN or reading the newspaper game write ups in 1958.
You’re getting pretty far off track now. Try sticking to the subject.
Losing bigger games in 2018 > winning them in the past.
Love watching you all screw yourselves into the ground with all of the twisting. Spending 15 years saying one thing then having to change your entire foundation in 2 is quite a tasty treat.
3 years tells you who you are
Win or GTFO
Seamen covered monitors when Oregon lost to standford every other year or twice in the final.
Now you wouldn’t trade losing to Alabama for a Rose Bowl victory over Ped State (which you could have corrected the next year but didn’t)
Wonderful stuff.
As you were...