Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The standards of success for Husky Football 2013

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,397 Founders Club
edited March 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
Here's how I view it...

1-5 wins disaster
6 wins extremely disappointing
7 wins mediocrity defined, time for a new coach
8 wins decent season, time for a new coach
9 wins modestly successful season, Sark probably deserves another season
10 wins successful season, Sark would deserve another season
11-13 wins Spectacular season; Sark would deserve extension and healthy raise

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134567…10

Comments

  • chrisvashonchrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    Agree. And for as much shit as we give Sark, a 9 or 10 win season is there for the taking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    With the OOC schedule the next couple years being so soft that should be an automatic 3-0 this year and 4-0 next year to start out. Of course they'll still shit the bed in conference play and ruin that nice start. This feels like a 5-4 type of year, maybe 6-3 if Jim Mora has the meltdown we're supposed to be on the look out for
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    This is pretty reasonable, Derek.

    I'm a little surprised but yes, your standards are good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    He would still deserve to go door.ass.out. with 9-4, but there's no way they could fire him for that.

    He's definitely back with 8 wins, and probably back with 6 or 7 wins. You just can't expect to win with a black QB after all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    A large part of the fan base consider 6-6 and a shitty bowl game to be winning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    That large part of the fanbase thoroughly deserves another 0-12.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    When UW rolls to a 4-1 start and some smart people point out that the schedule was front loaded with weaker teams, look for doogs to call those smart people "coog/duck trolls" and ask them why they can't just be happy with 4-1. The when 7 win Steve goes 7-6, they will conveniently forget what they were told at the beginning of October.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,397 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    When UW rolls to a 4-1 start and some smart people point out that the schedule was front loaded with weaker teams, look for doogs to call those smart people "coog/duck trolls" and ask them why they can't just be happy with 4-1. The when 7 win Steve goes 7-6, they will conveniently forget what they were told at the beginning of October.

    You're a man who speaks from experience
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,397 Founders Club
    edited March 2013
    Yes, there is no way they would ever fire him after a 6, 7 or 8 win season... but this is how I see it.

    Personally, I think they'll go 7-6 or 8-5 with four of the losses being grotesque beat downs.

    If by chance they go 6-7 and invariably retain Sark, Woodward's response to any critics will be, "We do things differently at Washington than at other places like in the SEC. We like to think we have a little more of a balanced perspective upon the student athlete experience."

    And the beat will go on.

    My dad disagrees with me, as he feels there will be tremendous pressure to fire Sark should the Dawgs only win six games. But I think our standards have been lowered and there wouldn't be much of an outcry for Sark's firing -- save for the Stomping Your Feet Board du jour on Dawgman.com.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    DerekJohnson said:

    Yes, there is no way they would ever fire him after a 6, 7 or 8 win season... but this is how I see it.

    Personally, I think they'll go 7-6 or 8-5 with four of the losses being grotesque beat downs.

    If by chance they go 6-7 and invariably retain Sark, Woodward's response to any critics will be, "We do things differently at Washington than at other places like in the SEC. We like to think we have a little more of a balanced perspective upon the student athlete experience."

    And the beat will go on.

    My dad disagrees with me, as he feels there will be tremendous pressure to fire Sark should the Dawgs only win six games. But I think our standards have been lowered and there wouldn't be much of an outcry for Sark's firing -- save for the Stomping Your Feet Board du jour on Dawgman.com.

    Are you and your Dad going to enjoy the games on crisp Fall afternoons regardless of the score? That's what it's all about anyway.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,340 Swaye's Wigwam
    No way Sark gets fired at 6 wins. I agree he should be he won't.

    Sure as hell won't happen at 7 or 8
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CheersWestDawgCheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,477 Swaye's Wigwam
    Face it. Even if Sark only wins 4 or 5 games, and if there's an injury to Kasen, ASJ, Price, Sankey, Shaq, or Parker there's no way he gets fired.

    I think only 3 wins or less would clinch it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    I think he's door.ass.out. if he goes 4-8 and safe if he goes 6-7.


    As always, the REAL O/U is 5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    I think he's door.ass.out. if he goes 4-8 and safe if he goes 6-7.


    As always, the REAL O/U is 5.

    Agreed

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,485 Founders Club
    Hi Harv ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    6 & 6 will not get him fired, particularly if he wins a punk bowl game and ends up at 7 - 6.

    A 500 record will keep him in the saddle for a few years. Maybe in 2015 the PC duds in the athletic dept. will start asking questions, even then if tickets are selling don't expect much.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,279 Founders Club
    edited March 2013
    DerekJohnson said:

    Here's how I view it...

    1-5 wins disaster
    6 wins extremely disappointing
    7 wins mediocrity defined, time for a new coach
    8 wins decent season, time for a new coach
    9 wins modestly successful season, Sark probably deserves another season
    10 wins successful season, Sark would deserve another season
    11-13 wins Spectacular season; Sark would deserve extension and healthy raise

    Looks reasonable, but should qualify "successful" to also mean no more blowout losses. That bullshit has gotten beyond old. Real progress means they show up and compete in every game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    if you can't see how Woody front loaded the schedule to ensure he gets his own extra year and mind-numbing severance check then I can't help you.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ACSlaterDawgACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200
    Sark has talked himself into a corner. Expectations are higher than people here think. He will get fired if he goes 7-6.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.