Race your pretty laughablet. I think message boards have many people that don’t wish to have any repartee but merely just wish to denigrate other people because they are spiteful, kind of like you and your ilk.
For example you are ignoring my Question and mocking and denigrating me instead.It doesn’t show a lot of “DECORUM”
Oklahoma sends a transfer QB to the award ceremony every year. What’s the problem with that?
Is Lincoln Reilly walking in the door some time soon?
So only he can do it?
This is the UW mentality
Also known as a loser mentality
Who the fuck cares how? Just win.
We dont need transfers. We dont need JC players. We don't need anything to remain relentlessly mediocre
Fuck that
Jimmy better be sleeping in the office now figuring every fucking angle
This isnt intramurals brother. This is D1 football
I don’t know anything about intramural sports at UW, Race. I’ve been in the IMA like twice.
I don’t understand the disagreement. I said earlier in the thread that I just want to win now baby and if Costello can help us do that then so be it.
I’m just not expecting him to win the Heisman- i.e., Lincoln Reilly magic.
It used to be said in these parts only losers worship the QB position.
It’s not about worship. It’s about improvement at the most important position. Mediocre can get us a shorty Rose Bowl. I have serious doubts Sirmon and/or Morris teaming up with Donovan. With Costello, the potential of a Rose Bowl returns.
@Canadawg whats wrong with this. We didn’t get the upgrade at QB that we desperately needed.
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
Race your pretty laughablet. I think message boards have many people that don’t wish to have any repartee but merely just wish to denigrate other people because they are spiteful, kind of like you and your ilk.
For example you are ignoring my Question and mocking and denigrating me instead.It doesn’t show a lot of “DECORUM”
I give my reasons for my opinions and defend them usually with evidence. Some on those boards are spiteful and argue with emotion like here. Maybe you would like to elaborate rather than merely inferring something and doing a juvenile hit and run attack.
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memory
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memory
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memory
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.
Completely agree but that's not what I'm taking issue with. I said I hoped he signs for just that reason but find it ridiculous that people think its him or nothing. That's all
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memory
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.
Completely agree but that's not what I'm taking issue with. I said I hoped he signs for just that reason but find it ridiculous that people think its him or nothing. That's all
Or we think he would have been better than what we have? A QB that has proven he can play is better than one that hasn’t.
@RoadDawg55 just that it seems that you were assuming alot to say having Costello automatically means a better chance of a RB over our current QBs.
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
It’s about competition, you retard. If Costello wasn’t the better option, he wouldn’t have won the job.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
Also did you not just watch 3/4 of a season with manu playing over ulofoshio?? You already assuming jimmy won't go soft and give him the start no matter what he does in camp. Short memory
I assume that more options is better than fewer options. And I assume you’re a doog.
Completely agree but that's not what I'm taking issue with. I said I hoped he signs for just that reason but find it ridiculous that people think its him or nothing. That's all
That’s not the point at all, and the fact that you have to continue to misrepresent the opposing position reveals how weak yours is.
Comments
For example you are ignoring my Question and mocking and denigrating me instead.It doesn’t show a lot of “DECORUM”
To clarify again, I do not have anything against costello but I find it odd that everyone got so negative about the 3 qbs in the room after Kjs name got floated.
I believe stalin mentioned only needing a solid seasoned QB (who I believe costello is). Is that seriously what gets UW fans excited? A serviceable senior QB?
In a perfect world he signs and gets beat by a higher ceiling QB in the room already.
Enjoy bible study with Sirmon.
Faggot
Leach. 1
Jimmy. 0
You even backpedal like a doog.