He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you mean
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?
They will. There is a process.
But he didn't say that in his report. He could have said that we wanted to prosecute Trump but couldn't because he is the CIC. But that's not what he said. Is he in on the cover up?
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.
Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.
Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.
No. I'm just pointing out that even if I grant you this point, my argument holds up. The argument is that he needs to be impeached regardless of collusion which is just a rhetorical device used to create a false dichotomy.
Isn't it amazing how they have absolutely no interest in the one Presidential campaign that we know for a fact did collude with the Russians in order impact the election.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump?
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.
Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.
No. I'm just pointing out that even if I grant you this point, my argument holds up. The argument is that he needs to be impeached regardless of collusion which is just a rhetorical device used to create a false dichotomy.
Yeah, your argument that I completely destroyed and that you repeatedly lied about held up great.
Isn't it amazing how they have absolutely no interest in the one Presidential campaign that we know for a fact did collude with the Russians in order impact the election.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump?
It is fine with me if they investigate this. The investigation started with a tipoff from the Australian intelligence not this report (which was not started by Hillary.) It's a red herring since as I keep reminding you: Trump didn't report his contacts to the FBI.
Isn't it amazing how they have absolutely no interest in the one Presidential campaign that we know for a fact did collude with the Russians in order impact the election.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump?
It is fine with me if they investigate this. The investigation started with a tipoff from the Australian intelligence not this report (which was not started by Hillary.) It's a red herring since as I keep reminding you: Trump didn't report his contacts to the FBI.
The Steele Dossier wasn’t started until Hillary and the DNC started paying Fusion GPS through the Perkins Coie law firm. It’s a lie to say otherwise which I keep telling you and Hondo. Hondo keeps repeating it because he is a pathological liar, what is your excuse?
Comments
But still
Go ahead and do it.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump?
Pelosi said Trump is trying to troll the Democrats into impeachment
You guys don't have the GUTS to do anything other than piss and moan for 8 years