"Collusion" sets up a false choice

SFGbob

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:

Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?

He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you mean

But he could charge everyone at the Trump Tower meeting with that crime, so why didn't he?

GrundleStiltzkin

ApostleofGrief said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:

Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?

He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you mean

Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?

They will. There is a process.

It's hard. It takes a minute.

RaceBannon

Mueller said Trump being a sitting president was not why he wasn't charged

But still

SFGbob

ApostleofGrief said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:

Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?

He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you mean

Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?

They will. There is a process.

But he didn't say that in his report. He could have said that we wanted to prosecute Trump but couldn't because he is the CIC. But that's not what he said. Is he in on the cover up?

ApostleofGrief

SFGbob said:

ApostleofGrief said:

https://www.quora.com/How-many-times-has-Trump-said-no-collusion

And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.

But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:

Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts

Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.

And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.

Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.

Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:

ApostleofGrief said:

https://www.quora.com/How-many-times-has-Trump-said-no-collusion

And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.

But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:

Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts

Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.

And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.

Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.

Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.

Bullshit

ApostleofGrief

You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal

SFGbob

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:

ApostleofGrief said:

https://www.quora.com/How-many-times-has-Trump-said-no-collusion

And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.

But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:

Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts

Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.

And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.

Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.

Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.

Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal

High crimes and misdemeanors

Go ahead and do it.

ApostleofGrief

SFGbob said:

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:

ApostleofGrief said:

https://www.quora.com/How-many-times-has-Trump-said-no-collusion

And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.

But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:

Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts

Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.

And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.

Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.

Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.

Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.

No. I'm just pointing out that even if I grant you this point, my argument holds up. The argument is that he needs to be impeached regardless of collusion which is just a rhetorical device used to create a false dichotomy.