Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
"Collusion" sets up a false choice
Comments
-
That's a good Kunt. Just ignore all the evidence that was provided showing that you're dead wrong and double down on your bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or. He posted the word countlessly.
Trump didn't start the use of "Collusion." The Rats did. The fact that Trump then denied any "Collusion" doesn't mean that he started it's use or that it was never part of the left's rhetoric.
Take your loss like a man and don't be like Hondo. -
Collusion was being used by the Rats and the Media, same thing, in July of 2016.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/clinton-campaign-chief-russians-trump-pro-russian-platform/story?id=40824946
To claim that Trump started it's use is pure crap. -
And to claim Trump had no knowledge Russians had DNC and Hillary emails is pure crap.SFGbob said:Collusion was being used by the Rats and the Media, same thing, in July of 2016.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/clinton-campaign-chief-russians-trump-pro-russian-platform/story?id=40824946
To claim that Trump started it's use is pure crap. -
I read all this shit and I came to the collusion, I mean conclusion, that if it was a stolen blow job Trump should be impeached
-
No this is pure crap:2001400ex said:
And to claim Trump had no knowledge Russians had DNC and Hillary emails is pure crap.SFGbob said:Collusion was being used by the Rats and the Media, same thing, in July of 2016.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/clinton-campaign-chief-russians-trump-pro-russian-platform/story?id=40824946
To claim that Trump started it's use is pure crap.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
If you have evidence that Trump knew the Russians had the DNC and Hillary emails lets see it Hondo because the word of pathological liar isn't worth much. I've not claimed that Trump had no knowledge because unlike you I'm not a liar and I have no evidence one way or the other. All I know is that I've not seen any evidence to support the claim that "Trump knew." -
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
-
They will. There is a process.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
But he could charge everyone at the Trump Tower meeting with that crime, so why didn't he?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
It's hard. It takes a minute.ApostleofGrief said:
They will. There is a process.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
Mueller said Trump being a sitting president was not why he wasn't charged
But still -
But he didn't say that in his report. He could have said that we wanted to prosecute Trump but couldn't because he is the CIC. But that's not what he said. Is he in on the cover up?ApostleofGrief said:
They will. There is a process.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.SFGbob said:
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything. -
BullshitApostleofGrief said:
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.SFGbob said:
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything. -
You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal
-
Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.SFGbob said:
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
-
High crimes and misdemeanorsApostleofGrief said:You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal
Go ahead and do it. -
No. I'm just pointing out that even if I grant you this point, my argument holds up. The argument is that he needs to be impeached regardless of collusion which is just a rhetorical device used to create a false dichotomy.SFGbob said:
Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.SFGbob said:
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything. -
Isn't it amazing how they have absolutely no interest in the one Presidential campaign that we know for a fact did collude with the Russians in order impact the election.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump? -
Yeah, your argument that I completely destroyed and that you repeatedly lied about held up great.ApostleofGrief said:
No. I'm just pointing out that even if I grant you this point, my argument holds up. The argument is that he needs to be impeached regardless of collusion which is just a rhetorical device used to create a false dichotomy.SFGbob said:
Yeah, forgot all of that earlier bullshit I claimed and focus instead on this new line of bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:
Fine. So tell me then why the present Commander in Chief didn't call the FBI having his campaign meet with Russian operatives repeatedly.SFGbob said:
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything. -
It is fine with me if they investigate this. The investigation started with a tipoff from the Australian intelligence not this report (which was not started by Hillary.) It's a red herring since as I keep reminding you: Trump didn't report his contacts to the FBI.SFGbob said:Isn't it amazing how they have absolutely no interest in the one Presidential campaign that we know for a fact did collude with the Russians in order impact the election.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump? -
A president can also commit a crime and not be impeached and confirmed through the Senate.ApostleofGrief said:You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal
-
Well look, impeachment is only for expulsion from office. It's a political process not a legal one.2001400ex said:
A president can also commit a crime and not be impeached and confirmed through the Senate.ApostleofGrief said:You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal
-
I didn't think it was possible to be so pathologically full of shit. Until Hondo.
-
That is exactly what I told my congressmanRaceBannon said:
High crimes and misdemeanorsApostleofGrief said:You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal
Go ahead and do it. -
And I'm sure he doesn't give a shitApostleofGrief said:
That is exactly what I told my congressmanRaceBannon said:
High crimes and misdemeanorsApostleofGrief said:You guys are getting still that impeachable offenses need not be illegal
Go ahead and do it.
Pelosi said Trump is trying to troll the Democrats into impeachment
You guys don't have the GUTS to do anything other than piss and moan for 8 years -
I used to think Apostle's Central football shtick was hilarious. Now I'm actually concerned it's not a bit.
-
The Steele Dossier wasn’t started until Hillary and the DNC started paying Fusion GPS through the Perkins Coie law firm. It’s a lie to say otherwise which I keep telling you and Hondo. Hondo keeps repeating it because he is a pathological liar, what is your excuse?ApostleofGrief said:
It is fine with me if they investigate this. The investigation started with a tipoff from the Australian intelligence not this report (which was not started by Hillary.) It's a red herring since as I keep reminding you: Trump didn't report his contacts to the FBI.SFGbob said:Isn't it amazing how they have absolutely no interest in the one Presidential campaign that we know for a fact did collude with the Russians in order impact the election.
Hillary paid for a British foreign national to gather dirt on Trump, from his Russian sources, none of which has ever been verified and which the author himself says was mostly bullshit and in all likelihood Russian disinformation that was then used by State Department, the DOJ the FBI and CIA to open up a counter-intelligence investigation on the Trump campaign, and none of you Kunt give a shit.
Why are you not upset about the DNC and Hillary using "Russian operatives" to gather dirt on Trump?
