USC/UCLA sell Pac 12 couch
Comments
-
OK that sounds like new math to mewhatshouldicareabout said:
They already have 14, so 14+4 is 18.RaceBannon said:California insisted that USC and ucla play Cal and Stanford every year regardless of division
They go too and that's your 16 teams
I have zero interest in anything after that
Roll Tide and fuck off
Good point though
Still an issue -
If money is what matters, why let 16 or 18 the limit? If FOX is driving this to get back at ESPN, I can see them wanting to bring in other Pac-12 or ACC markets.RaceBannon said:
OK that sounds like new math to mewhatshouldicareabout said:
They already have 14, so 14+4 is 18.RaceBannon said:California insisted that USC and ucla play Cal and Stanford every year regardless of division
They go too and that's your 16 teams
I have zero interest in anything after that
Roll Tide and fuck off
Good point though
Still an issue -
I would say the fact that you mentioned Oregon, without a single quook saying word, is enough proof.WoolleyDoog said:Oregon fans, sell me on why a conference wants you? Very difficult stadium to get to, no TV market, track record of negative recruiting and going to throw money at kids to overpay recruits that just drives up the cost for everyone.
Obviously Phil can buy them in but all his shit just benefits one program and fucks the others.
But I’m sure you’ll continue to tie yourself into a knot anyway.
Carry on… -
Fuck - back in the trailer park. At least I have some new neighbors this time.
-
I said last year the two conference should merge. Get rid of some of the bottom feeders in both.whatshouldicareabout said:
If money is what matters, why let 16 or 18 the limit? If FOX is driving this to get back at ESPN, I can see them wanting to bring in other Pac-12 or ACC markets.RaceBannon said:
OK that sounds like new math to mewhatshouldicareabout said:
They already have 14, so 14+4 is 18.RaceBannon said:California insisted that USC and ucla play Cal and Stanford every year regardless of division
They go too and that's your 16 teams
I have zero interest in anything after that
Roll Tide and fuck off
Good point though
Still an issue
Not add more difficult out of conf road games against each other to “get back” at the SEC.
Oregon and Washington should both charter a rocket out to Rosemont Illinois and suck as much cock as necessary to be a part of this. -
Because I'm stuck in the old fashioned thinking that a 20 or 24 team league isn't a leaguewhatshouldicareabout said:
If money is what matters, why let 16 or 18 the limit? If FOX is driving this to get back at ESPN, I can see them wanting to bring in other Pac-12 or ACC markets.RaceBannon said:
OK that sounds like new math to mewhatshouldicareabout said:
They already have 14, so 14+4 is 18.RaceBannon said:California insisted that USC and ucla play Cal and Stanford every year regardless of division
They go too and that's your 16 teams
I have zero interest in anything after that
Roll Tide and fuck off
Good point though
Still an issue
Play USC once a decade
Now
If the Super B1G has an 8 team Pacific division that is the old Pac 8 I'm back in -
We have the people to do it hereMikeSeaver said:
I said last year the two conference should merge. Get rid of some of the bottom feeders in both.whatshouldicareabout said:
If money is what matters, why let 16 or 18 the limit? If FOX is driving this to get back at ESPN, I can see them wanting to bring in other Pac-12 or ACC markets.RaceBannon said:
OK that sounds like new math to mewhatshouldicareabout said:
They already have 14, so 14+4 is 18.RaceBannon said:California insisted that USC and ucla play Cal and Stanford every year regardless of division
They go too and that's your 16 teams
I have zero interest in anything after that
Roll Tide and fuck off
Good point though
Still an issue
Not add more difficult out of conf road games against each other to “get back” at the SEC.
Oregon and Washington should both charter a rocket out to Rosemont Illinois and suck as much cock as necessary to be a part of this. -
That FS article says Oregon's a top brand because "Mario Christobol built them into a contender and they have won the Pac 12 twice recently"greenblood said:
How does a school spending money not help the conference? If Oregon is willing to continuously upgrade and pay for talented players, it only improves them competitively, and helps provide a stronger conference.WoolleyDoog said:
I'll give you the first one until Phil dies then everything is a question mark. Second one doesn't benefit anyone but them. Having a few incels on Twitter in Florida and signing non-region guys who get dropped by the blues in their region doesn't make you a national brand.greenblood said:
Because Oregon cares about football, spends money, and has a national brand. Was that a serious question, or have you always been one of Haie's alt accounts?WoolleyDoog said:Oregon fans, sell me on why a conference wants you? Very difficult stadium to get to, no TV market, track record of negative recruiting and going to throw money at kids to overpay recruits that just drives up the cost for everyone.
Obviously Phil can buy them in but all his shit just benefits one program and fucks the others.
Adding the LA schools opens up a new market for you. Maybe Seattle and the Bay Area does. Oregon does nothing.
Oregon still draws a solid national audience. You can pick or choose Cal or Stanford and get the Bay area. Washington gets you Seattle. Arizona or ASU gets you Phoenix, and Oregon gets you Portland. You can shit on Oregon's market all you want, but it's still larger than Northwestern, Purdue, Indiana, and Nebraska.
No brand?
https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/ncaa-football-rankings/college-football-brands-ranking-according-to-high-school-recruits#gid=ci029cf7784000247a&pid=9-oregon-ducks -
-
Welp, college football is dead. Wonder what the next generational death knell will be. Lots more free time to spend with my two dads.
