Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official invite from Softy Mahler via twitter

1…34689…12

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    dhdawg said:

    I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila

    With Ty he always claims he didn't feel like we had enough evidence to fire him then. Then he says he regrets it and won't make that mistake again.

    Even though he is with Romar and was with Sark.

    Also claims he knew there was warning signs against Ty in year two. He's a revisionist history fat fuck major.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    He_pNeeds_More_Time said:

    dhdawg said:

    I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila

    With Ty he always claims he didn't feel like we had enough evidence to fire him then. Then he says he regrets it and won't make that mistake again.

    Even though he is with Romar and was with Sark.

    Also claims he knew there was warning signs against Ty in year two. He's a revisionist history fat fuck major.
    I didn't know they offered that course at BCC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Swaye said:

    I was going to write a long response to this thread. Then I realized I don't give enough of a fuck.

    Sark sucks dick.
    Softy sucks dick.
    Kim sucks dick.
    Doogs suck dick.
    Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.

    The end.

    Classics Bored. Now.
    also true

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    RoadDawg55 said:

    dhdawg said:

    I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila

    Not Tequilla. He's too much of an intellectual and would get off track instead of making concise points. Before you know it, they would be arguing about something entirely different. I would nominate Chest.

    Seconded
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    I have no problem going and talking with Softy ...

    But there's also a good chance that I'd make his head explode because I'd have a counter point to anything he offered up and after about 15-20 minutes he'd realize that he has no chance of "out debating me" without going into Frank the Tank mode.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    It's a shame the full blown AIDS took out Race Bannon and that iDawg died in a mudslide while on fire as I'd love for those two to sit down with him.

    Chest given his calls would be a good option. Softy even admitted last night that the ASU call Chest got under Baird's skin.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    The more I think about it, meeting with Softy would do nothing other than provide some entertainment. The only good thing is he wouldn't be able to hide behind the BrentsFS act of saying, "SAY IT TO MY FACE!" He would stick to saying there is no way to know what Sark would have achieved at UW. You could nail him with all the facts, but it doesn't matter. Until Sark got fired, there is no real way to prove to an idiot like Softy or Kim that he sucked. The meeting would be no different from any other debate with Softy, whether it be More_Time laying it out for him on Twitter or Peter destroying the Honks on the air.

    Not to mention, Softy's followers will follow anything he says because he has a platform and he is closer to the program than all of us. The truth is, RoadDawg55 and Tailgater have forgotten more about UW Football than the snot nosed cunt they call "Softy" has ever known. It would end with Softy buying some drinks and saying we are all Dawg fans.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    Free drinks >>> Free pub
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    You'd end up getting frustrated more than anything. Do I think he's as much of a Doog as he is on air? No I don't but I do think he actually is a true Doog at heart. If he wasn't on radio he'd be the Doog arguing with us on Doogman and Twitter I have no doubts.

    If I was going to meet up with any of them for drinks it would be Baird. At least I'd have a good time since he obviously is down to get shit faced since he is shit faced 100% of the time.

    Softy strikes me as a 2-3 drink at most guy.

    RoadDawg is right you can lay the facts out there and he won't care. Even last night he conceded quickly and pull the whole "We are all Dawg fans let's get a drink".
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter