Official invite from Softy Mahler via twitter

TierbsHsotBoobs

dnc said:

Tequilla said:

The facts will doom Softy every single time in this argument ... that's the bottom line.

Doogs hate facts

See this thread.

RoadDawg55

Softy isn't going to admit he's an idiot for defending Sark all these years. It's perfectly set up for Petersen to come in and have success and hear from Softy and his followers that Sark set this program up nicely. Until Sark falls on his face at USC, there is no pressure on them to admit anything. Even when he does, I bet they will say it doesn't matter. It's time for Kim, Softy, and those types to fuck off.

[Deleted User]

dnc said:

Tequilla said:

The facts will doom Softy every single time in this argument ... that's the bottom line.

Doogs hate facts

Agree, speaking of which I'm hearing Mitch Levy makes 500K for a non syndicated radio show.

Tequilla

Doogs hate facts because there are no logical arguments that can be made to support the facts ...

Doogs like cotton candy and cherry blossoms ...

You have cotton candy and cherry blossoms in Chris Petersen ... there's a lot of wins in the future of this program ...

Yet Doogs are too damned worried about the fact that they lost their sizzle in Sark and worried that they'll go back to the depths of mediocrity since they are buying hook, line, and sinker that Petersen hasn't "proved it" yet (which is about as fucktarded of an argument as you can make).

It's downright comical.

RoadDawg55

And if you have the opportunity to meet with Softy, I would take it. If we really want new voices and for Kim, Softy, and those types to fall off a cliff, you gotta take advantage of these opportunities.

Ron_Fairly

I look forward to a time that Softy invites me to his show to discuss baseball and bratwurst

[Deleted User]

Softy pulled a Kim too. "How do you know Sark wasn't about to break through and start going to Rose Bowls? How do we know Petersen will be successful?".

I said for Sark we have 5 years of evidence to tell us that. His best team went 5-4 in conference the same as years 2,3, and 4.

While Petersen might not either odds are greater since he's 92-12 with 2 BCS wins than Sark who was 31-29 vs FBS schools.

Swaye

I was going to write a long response to this thread. Then I realized I don't give enough of a fuck.

Sark sucks dick.
Softy sucks dick.
Kim sucks dick.
Doogs suck dick.
Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.

The end.

dhdawg

I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila

TierbsHsotBoobs

Swaye said:

I was going to write a long response to this thread. Then I realized I don't give enough of a fuck.

Sark sucks dick.
Softy sucks dick.
Kim sucks dick.
Doogs suck dick.
Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.

The end.

Front. Page. Now.