Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Official invite from Softy Mahler via twitter

2456

Comments

  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary

    Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

    The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

    Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

    Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

    Everybody says so.
  • Options
    PurpleMicrodotPurpleMicrodot Member Posts: 66
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

    The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

    Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

    Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

    Everybody says so.
    If you can't see the incremental progress in that then DiggyDawg can't help you
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary

    Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

    The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

    Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

    Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

    Everybody says so.
    Agree to a point but holt goes 4-8 with the dreckfest offense sark put out in 2012. We lose to Stanford Oregon state and maybe even SDSU (fml)

  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    edited March 2014

    I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

    LOL 0-12!!!!!!
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    dhdawg said:

    Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

    The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

    Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

    Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

    Everybody says so.
    Agree to a point but holt goes 4-8 with the dreckfest offense sark put out in 2012. We lose to Stanford Oregon state and maybe even SDSU (fml)

    Are you new here?
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,816
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs

    I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

    And how many people here would argue that Petersen wasn't left with a better starting place than Sark was? That's just flat out not answering the question ... which is because he CAN'T answer that question.
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    dhdawg said:

    Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

    The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

    Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

    Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

    Everybody says so.
    Agree to a point but holt goes 4-8 with the dreckfest offense sark put out in 2012. We lose to Stanford Oregon state and maybe even SDSU (fml)

    This. We lose at least two more games, probably three (SDSU, Stanford, Oregon State, Cal). I still bet Sark would have gotten one more year.

  • Options
    poc81poc81 Member Posts: 219
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes Photogenic 5 Up Votes
    Sounds like an invite for indian leg wrestling.
  • Options
    allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker First Anniversary

    I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

    Christ he says 'bottom line' a lot.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    It would be wrong to ask Softy why he thinks UW is a stepping stone school now.
  • Options
    HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    Let me help since Sven does not watch any games.

    2012 season you had an awful offense and a top 30 defense, which was a major improvement over previous dreck and unexpected. Had those coaches not come in, you lose to Stanford, OSU and Cal and dont sniff a bowl game. And yes, maybe even SDSU also.
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

    Christ he says 'bottom line' a lot.
    Classic power bottom line.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah

    I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

    LOL 0-12!!!!!!
    When I brought up Sark failing by his own goals of competing for a rose bowl and natty's he of course ignored it.

    Facts are UW was eliminated from contention in mid October in year five.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    The Wilcox Doogs are almost as bad as the Sark Doogs.

    At least they defend an adult though.
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Tequilla said:

    Bottom line, there's 3 primary things that Softy, and other Sark supporters (hi Kim Jong Vino), need to understand:

    1) I can't think of many people that don't realize that this program is in a better place today than it was when Sark took over - he should be thanked for that. But at the same time, it was also clear that he wasn't the answer going forward to take this program to the next level.

    2) There are a number of people that know what the UW is capable of if properly motivated ... and Woodward proved that by hiring Petersen. It essentially was a giant middle finger to anybody that said "well, who would you hire to replace Sark" ... answer: somebody better.

    3) There's not a lot of reason to be afraid of Sark at USC because even though Sark will get good talent (which he also got at Washington), his lack of focus, discipline, and attention to detail will still result in SC under performing. However, because he's at SC he might move up from seven-win Steve to eight-win Steve. Sark's definitely not a coach in the ilk of Petey, John Robinson (the first time around), or John McKay.

    Right on cue

  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,816
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs
    The facts will doom Softy every single time in this argument ... that's the bottom line.
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,816
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs
    Bottom line, the bottom line is the bottom line ...
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Tequilla said:

    The facts will doom Softy every single time in this argument ... that's the bottom line.

    Doogs hate facts

Sign In or Register to comment.