Official invite from Softy Mahler via twitter

TierbsHsotBoobs

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

Everybody says so.

PurpleMicrodot

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

Everybody says so.

If you can't see the incremental progress in that then DiggyDawg can't help you

[Deleted User]

I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

dhdawg

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

Everybody says so.

Agree to a point but holt goes 4-8 with the dreckfest offense sark put out in 2012. We lose to Stanford Oregon state and maybe even SDSU (fml)

TierbsHsotBoobs

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

LOL 0-12!!!!!!

TierbsHsotBoobs

dhdawg said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

Everybody says so.

Agree to a point but holt goes 4-8 with the dreckfest offense sark put out in 2012. We lose to Stanford Oregon state and maybe even SDSU (fml)

Are you new here?

Tequilla

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

And how many people here would argue that Petersen wasn't left with a better starting place than Sark was? That's just flat out not answering the question ... which is because he CAN'T answer that question.

RoadDawg55

dhdawg said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Tequilla, we've discussed this ad naseum.

The advanced metrics show very little difference between the 2009-2012 seasons compared to 2006-2007. Those were basically average teams, ranked around 45-55.

Fact is, if Wilcox and the other guys weren't hired at the end of 11, Sark probably has his worst season in 2012 and gets canned.

Going 5-4, 5-4 with Wilcox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going 4-5, 5-4, 5-4 with Holt.

Everybody says so.

Agree to a point but holt goes 4-8 with the dreckfest offense sark put out in 2012. We lose to Stanford Oregon state and maybe even SDSU (fml)

This. We lose at least two more games, probably three (SDSU, Stanford, Oregon State, Cal). I still bet Sark would have gotten one more year.

poc81

Sounds like an invite for indian leg wrestling.

allpurpleallgold

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I brought up 5-4 four years in a row. He changed the subject "bottom line we have Petersen now and Sark left us better off than when he took over. All is good"

Christ he says 'bottom line' a lot.