Softy isn't going to admit he's an idiot for defending Sark all these years. It's perfectly set up for Petersen to come in and have success and hear from Softy and his followers that Sark set this program up nicely. Until Sark falls on his face at USC, there is no pressure on them to admit anything. Even when he does, I bet they will say it doesn't matter. It's time for Kim, Softy, and those types to fuck off.
Doogs hate facts because there are no logical arguments that can be made to support the facts ...
Doogs like cotton candy and cherry blossoms ...
You have cotton candy and cherry blossoms in Chris Petersen ... there's a lot of wins in the future of this program ...
Yet Doogs are too damned worried about the fact that they lost their sizzle in Sark and worried that they'll go back to the depths of mediocrity since they are buying hook, line, and sinker that Petersen hasn't "proved it" yet (which is about as fucktarded of an argument as you can make).
And if you have the opportunity to meet with Softy, I would take it. If we really want new voices and for Kim, Softy, and those types to fall off a cliff, you gotta take advantage of these opportunities.
Softy pulled a Kim too. "How do you know Sark wasn't about to break through and start going to Rose Bowls? How do we know Petersen will be successful?".
I said for Sark we have 5 years of evidence to tell us that. His best team went 5-4 in conference the same as years 2,3, and 4.
While Petersen might not either odds are greater since he's 92-12 with 2 BCS wins than Sark who was 31-29 vs FBS schools.
I was going to write a long response to this thread. Then I realized I don't give enough of a fuck.
Sark sucks dick. Softy sucks dick. Kim sucks dick. Doogs suck dick. Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.
I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila
I was going to write a long response to this thread. Then I realized I don't give enough of a fuck.
Sark sucks dick. Softy sucks dick. Kim sucks dick. Doogs suck dick. Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.
I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila
With Ty he always claims he didn't feel like we had enough evidence to fire him then. Then he says he regrets it and won't make that mistake again.
Even though he is with Romar and was with Sark.
Also claims he knew there was warning signs against Ty in year two. He's a revisionist history fat fuck major.
I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila
With Ty he always claims he didn't feel like we had enough evidence to fire him then. Then he says he regrets it and won't make that mistake again.
Even though he is with Romar and was with Sark.
Also claims he knew there was warning signs against Ty in year two. He's a revisionist history fat fuck major.
I was going to write a long response to this thread. Then I realized I don't give enough of a fuck.
Sark sucks dick. Softy sucks dick. Kim sucks dick. Doogs suck dick. Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.
I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila
Not Tequilla. He's too much of an intellectual and would get off track instead of making concise points. Before you know it, they would be arguing about something entirely different. I would nominate Chest. He's already proven he can destroy Softy.
I do think we should send someone, I would like to get his answers on this board on why he supported Ty, and why he wants access. I feel like we would get an actual answer face to face. I nominate tequila
Not Tequilla. He's too much of an intellectual and would get off track instead of making concise points. Before you know it, they would be arguing about something entirely different. I would nominate Chest.
I have no problem going and talking with Softy ...
But there's also a good chance that I'd make his head explode because I'd have a counter point to anything he offered up and after about 15-20 minutes he'd realize that he has no chance of "out debating me" without going into Frank the Tank mode.
The more I think about it, meeting with Softy would do nothing other than provide some entertainment. The only good thing is he wouldn't be able to hide behind the BrentsFS act of saying, "SAY IT TO MY FACE!" He would stick to saying there is no way to know what Sark would have achieved at UW. You could nail him with all the facts, but it doesn't matter. Until Sark got fired, there is no real way to prove to an idiot like Softy or Kim that he sucked. The meeting would be no different from any other debate with Softy, whether it be More_Time laying it out for him on Twitter or Peter destroying the Honks on the air.
Not to mention, Softy's followers will follow anything he says because he has a platform and he is closer to the program than all of us. The truth is, RoadDawg55 and Tailgater have forgotten more about UW Football than the snot nosed cunt they call "Softy" has ever known. It would end with Softy buying some drinks and saying we are all Dawg fans.
You'd end up getting frustrated more than anything. Do I think he's as much of a Doog as he is on air? No I don't but I do think he actually is a true Doog at heart. If he wasn't on radio he'd be the Doog arguing with us on Doogman and Twitter I have no doubts.
If I was going to meet up with any of them for drinks it would be Baird. At least I'd have a good time since he obviously is down to get shit faced since he is shit faced 100% of the time.
Softy strikes me as a 2-3 drink at most guy.
RoadDawg is right you can lay the facts out there and he won't care. Even last night he conceded quickly and pull the whole "We are all Dawg fans let's get a drink".
Comments
Doogs like cotton candy and cherry blossoms ...
You have cotton candy and cherry blossoms in Chris Petersen ... there's a lot of wins in the future of this program ...
Yet Doogs are too damned worried about the fact that they lost their sizzle in Sark and worried that they'll go back to the depths of mediocrity since they are buying hook, line, and sinker that Petersen hasn't "proved it" yet (which is about as fucktarded of an argument as you can make).
It's downright comical.
I said for Sark we have 5 years of evidence to tell us that. His best team went 5-4 in conference the same as years 2,3, and 4.
While Petersen might not either odds are greater since he's 92-12 with 2 BCS wins than Sark who was 31-29 vs FBS schools.
Sark sucks dick.
Softy sucks dick.
Kim sucks dick.
Doogs suck dick.
Because they all suck dick they will never admit we were right and they were wrong. I hope they all die in a mudslide mixed with napalm.
The end.
Even though he is with Romar and was with Sark.
Also claims he knew there was warning signs against Ty in year two. He's a revisionist history fat fuck major.
But there's also a good chance that I'd make his head explode because I'd have a counter point to anything he offered up and after about 15-20 minutes he'd realize that he has no chance of "out debating me" without going into Frank the Tank mode.
Chest given his calls would be a good option. Softy even admitted last night that the ASU call Chest got under Baird's skin.
Not to mention, Softy's followers will follow anything he says because he has a platform and he is closer to the program than all of us. The truth is, RoadDawg55 and Tailgater have forgotten more about UW Football than the snot nosed cunt they call "Softy" has ever known. It would end with Softy buying some drinks and saying we are all Dawg fans.
If I was going to meet up with any of them for drinks it would be Baird. At least I'd have a good time since he obviously is down to get shit faced since he is shit faced 100% of the time.
Softy strikes me as a 2-3 drink at most guy.
RoadDawg is right you can lay the facts out there and he won't care. Even last night he conceded quickly and pull the whole "We are all Dawg fans let's get a drink".