New Poll Shows Almost HALF Of Women Want To Stay HOME, Not Work

DerekJohnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8U7qU9410Y

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.

I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.

HHusky

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.

I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.

The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.

haie

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.

I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.

The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.

Fuck Off loser.

LebamDawg

If women would go back to taking care of kids and houses for their hubbies - then the unemployment issue would be null and void. I always say "get your biscuits in the oven and your buns in the bed"

HHusky

haie said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.

I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.

The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.

Fuck Off loser.

Well reasoned.

But wordy.

NorthwestFresh

HHusky said:

haie said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.

I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.

The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.

Fuck Off loser.

Well reasoned.

But wordy.

Fuck Off loser

TheKobeStopper

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

SFGbob

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

Both people having to work has been a staple of American life since the 70s.

TheKobeStopper

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

Both people having to work has been a staple of American life since the 70s.

Dual income households didn’t pass single income households until the 80s. Guess who was president then.

haie

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

False.

NorthwestFresh

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

@BearsWiin, true?

PurpleThrobber

TheKobeStopper said:

SFGbob said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

Both people having to work has been a staple of American life since the 70s.

Dual income households didn’t pass single income households until the 80s. Guess who was president then.

Your attempt to revise history is again an epic fail. Women in the late 60's and 70's were burning their bras and demanding equal rights and opportunities.

By the 80's women were making inroads in professions outside of traditional roles of secretaries, nurses and teachers. So, yes, Reagan was President when huge strides were made in recognizing the distaff sex were fully capable of doing the same jobs traditionally reserved for men as the economy exploded.

You may also recall Reagan appointed the first woman to the Supreme Court in his first year in office.

Or are you as big a misogynist as the Dazzler?

Fire_Marshall_Bill

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.

I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.

The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.

about what I expected from a Seattle liberal like you

Fire_Marshall_Bill

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

If Dimocrats acted like they did in the 70s, I'd support them.

They don't. They sold out decades ago. Now it's all woke and feminist bullshit and carrying water for China and the one percent. Sad.

Prestonluv

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.

My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.

I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.

40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it

My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.

When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.

Easy peasy.

I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice

TheKobeStopper

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

If Dimocrats acted like they did in the 70s, I'd support them.

They don't. They sold out decades ago. Now it's all woke and feminist bullshit and carrying water for China and the one percent. Sad.

The woke shit stays. There’s bullshit like manspreading, science is white supremacy, black people cant be racist, there’s dumb shit for sure. And then you’ve got the libs painting BLM and rainbows on bombs we drop on kids. But one of our biggest concerns class reductionism. We do not believe that all oppression is a byproduct of class so racial justice, lgbtq rights, we’re not leaving those behind.

My experience with the left, and I mean Bernie/AOC and over, is most of the woke shit that gets amplified isn’t what we believe in but some of it is. If that’s a deal breaker, then that’s too bad. But we’ll always have room for you if you change your mind.

HuskyJW

Most mass/school shooters come from a single mom or a broken family

It’s true

Doogles

HuskyJW said:

Most mass/school shooters come from a single mom or a broken family

It’s true

Are you suggesting we pass common sense stay at home mom reform?

DoogieMcDoogerson

Boom. You nailed the plan. It's the secret for raising good kids. My wife and I did same thing. I just wasn't quite as impoverished as you, lol. Wife works now just to have something to do. Kids 24, 21. Damn near perfect kids.

Prestonluv said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.

Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.

No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.

My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.

I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.

40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it

My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.

When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.

Easy peasy.

I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice

HuskyJW

Doogles said:

HuskyJW said:

Most mass/school shooters come from a single mom or a broken family

It’s true

Are you suggesting we pass common sense stay at home mom reform?

No

We should ban mass and school shootings though