MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Nope. Just a local hs student with hands on the ec team cocks
This is an adult website, sir! Uncle Stalin, where is the thing that asks you your age?
Stick around a little @montlakemamba and you’ll end up like BTP.
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.
Is this not the exact type of story Jude was supposed to be all over? Call of duty is hard.
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.
It has come to light that, apparently, they (KING5) held off on the victim’s request. A very reasonable thing to do. It’s my biggest concern about releasing the police investigation once I get it. If it’s too damaging to the victim I wouldn’t. The U of O basketball team report was really bad for the victim, although the players didn’t look any better.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes.
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.
It has come to light that, apparently, they (KING5) held off on the victim’s request. A very reasonable thing to do. It’s my biggest concern about releasing the police investigation once I get it. If it’s too damaging to the victim I wouldn’t. The U of O basketball team report was really bad for the victim, although the players didn’t look any better.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes.
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.
It has come to light that, apparently, they (KING5) held off on the victim’s request. A very reasonable thing to do. It’s my biggest concern about releasing the police investigation once I get it. If it’s too damaging to the victim I wouldn’t. The U of O basketball team report was really bad for the victim, although the players didn’t look any better.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes.
Comments
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes.
https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein?s=09