Steven Ortiz Jr, 2021 4* DB, Goodyear (Desert Edge), AZ (Offered)
Comments
-
..... here we go -
I am working with Stanford Daily Sports on twitter as he is a big account that can get the story out.montlakemamba said:
..... here we go
-
montlakemamba said:
..... here we go -
-
It's been out. Nobody was paying attention for whatever reason.dnc said: -
MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
-
Nope. Just a local hs student with friends on the ec teamRatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
-
-
This is an adult website, sir! Uncle Stalin, where is the thing that asks you your age?montlakemamba said:
Nope. Just a local hs student with hands on the ec team cocksRatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
-
So.....now that it's been reported by quite a few out there that Ortiz did not have a commitable offer/ was being told to wait by UW (and several other schools), what's your take?sonics1993 said:What concerns me the most is I talked to a UW position coach over the weekend who told me that he thought Ortiz and Phillip would commit to them soon. So obviously they have no feel for how things are going but boy are they going to find out quickly.
-
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
-
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.1to392831weretaken said:
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden. -
Stick around a little @montlakemamba and you’ll end up like BTP.RatherBeBrewing said:
This is an adult website, sir! Uncle Stalin, where is the thing that asks you your age?montlakemamba said:
Nope. Just a local hs student with hands on the ec team cocksRatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
-
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.RatherBeBrewing said:
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.1to392831weretaken said:
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden. -
Is this not the exact type of story Jude was supposed to be all over? Call of duty is hard.dirtysouwfdawg said:
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.RatherBeBrewing said:
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.1to392831weretaken said:
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden. -
@Doog_de_Jour, would you roll over, elbow Mike Vorel, and ask him to get on this?
-
It has come to light that, apparently, they (KING5) held off on the victim’s request. A very reasonable thing to do. It’s my biggest concern about releasing the police investigation once I get it. If it’s too damaging to the victim I wouldn’t. The U of O basketball team report was really bad for the victim, although the players didn’t look any better.dirtysouwfdawg said:
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.RatherBeBrewing said:
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.1to392831weretaken said:
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes. -
Nevermind
-
Hit up your boy Ken Klippenstein:RatherBeBrewing said:
It has come to light that, apparently, they (KING5) held off on the victim’s request. A very reasonable thing to do. It’s my biggest concern about releasing the police investigation once I get it. If it’s too damaging to the victim I wouldn’t. The U of O basketball team report was really bad for the victim, although the players didn’t look any better.dirtysouwfdawg said:
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.RatherBeBrewing said:
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.1to392831weretaken said:
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes.
https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein?s=09 -
His header is Ronald Dregan, so I’m sold.Emoterman said:
Hit up your boy Ken Klippenstein:RatherBeBrewing said:
It has come to light that, apparently, they (KING5) held off on the victim’s request. A very reasonable thing to do. It’s my biggest concern about releasing the police investigation once I get it. If it’s too damaging to the victim I wouldn’t. The U of O basketball team report was really bad for the victim, although the players didn’t look any better.dirtysouwfdawg said:
His name is Mike. He’s a quality journalist but unfortunately he works for a shitty company who probably wouldn’t allow him to cover the story.RatherBeBrewing said:
I'm not involved at all with those. I don't have the report yet. I just put in a request for the police investigation and DA correspondence. When I get it I'll most likely post a PDF because the public deserves to know. Unfortunately, I don't have a big account to get the story out.1to392831weretaken said:
Maybe I'm an idiot and still don't get it, but how are you related to this? The only FOIA requests I've read about to this point came from KING5 and ST. Do you work for one of them? Or do you work for Stanford Daily Sports? In short, how are you involved?RatherBeBrewing said:MontlakeMamba is CFBquotes, if it wasn’t fucking obvious. And it was me who asked for a FOIA request: two minutes work. Asked Stanford’s compliance office if they were aware of the situation before I published it. Up to two (maybe three, I don’t have all the names) other schools now. I’ll get in touch with them tomorrow.
If for some reason I'm initially denied I'll appeal and eventually get it because others have and you can't deny an FOIA for some when you have already granted it for others. I'm entitled to it under the RCW, it didn't all of a sudden become exempt after KING5 got it and did nothing with it. For the time being I won't be contacting anyone, not my business, I'll just wait for the report for now - and I'm sure they'll drag it out.
I wouldn't have given this any effort, but there might be a cover up and the public deserves to know how the sheriff's office and DA handled this. Hopefully some journalist who can do this justice actually does something. But ST is basically alleging that the King County DA is colluding with private parties to keep this hidden.
My biggest issue is how this was investigated. The DAs office is loath to prosecute the sexual assault part of it- very low conviction rate on these types of things. Sad, but true. It becomes he said she said, gray areas of consent. What I’d like to know is if they did any cyber digging on the CP angle of it. Even with Snapchat recovering videos sent is not hard. I’m not a tech guy, but Snapchat backs up memories, and a tech forensic guy from the FBI could have done it - of that I have little doubt.
My goal is to make sure the alleged crime was investigated properly. If it wasn’t there should be major changes to how this is handled in the future, because I hate to see people skate free on heinous crimes.
https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein?s=09
