Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Josh Conerly, 2022 5* OL, Seattle (Rainier Beach), WA (Offered)
Comments
-
Same excuse in petermans offense. I feel like two is a pattern… IMOdnc said:
I want to see Huff finish the year with a different OC. I think a lot of the OL struggles are attributable to Donovan. But I agree his seat should be hot.godawgst said:
I have seen enough of Huff at this point. He can recruit (one of 2 maybe 3 on staff) but development is not there.hardhat said:
Not a ringing endorsement of Huff
Without dramatic improvement post Donovan I'm on bored with moving on.
Just needs more Tim to get his guys in?
-
And another…
-
His struggles are attributable to Lake. Before that, when the struggles weren't nearly so severe, they were attributable to Petersen's offense just plain sucking.dnc said:
I want to see Huff finish the year with a different OC. I think a lot of the OL struggles are attributable to Donovan. But I agree his seat should be hot.godawgst said:
I have seen enough of Huff at this point. He can recruit (one of 2 maybe 3 on staff) but development is not there.hardhat said:
Not a ringing endorsement of Huff
Without dramatic improvement post Donovan I'm on bored with moving on.
Bottome line for me is that, while I think Huff has been at a big disadvantage his entire time at UW and it's worse than ever now, it's time for him to go too. Full house cleaning time. -
He’s also had five years and hasn’t had a single OL that was better in 2016. The 2016 OL might have been lacking depth and got punked by Alabama, but they were mauling everyone else.chuck said:
His struggles are attributable to Lake. Before that, when the struggles weren't nearly so severe, they were attributable to Petersen's offense just plain sucking.dnc said:
I want to see Huff finish the year with a different OC. I think a lot of the OL struggles are attributable to Donovan. But I agree his seat should be hot.godawgst said:
I have seen enough of Huff at this point. He can recruit (one of 2 maybe 3 on staff) but development is not there.hardhat said:
Not a ringing endorsement of Huff
Without dramatic improvement post Donovan I'm on bored with moving on.
Bottome line for me is that, while I think Huff has been at a big disadvantage his entire time at UW and it's worse than ever now, it's time for him to go too. Full house cleaning time.
That said, he might be okay and he has worked for shitty offenses that started from the top down. In any case, he still needs to go. It’s a perfect time too. We have a bunch of highly recruited OL and a good coach should be able to make it a top tier OL. -
Strauser could not recruit, but he could fucking coach. Holly fuck, I am reminiscing about strauserRoadDawg55 said:
He’s also had five years and hasn’t had a single OL that was better in 2016. The 2016 OL might have been lacking depth and got punked by Alabama, but they were mauling everyone else.chuck said:
His struggles are attributable to Lake. Before that, when the struggles weren't nearly so severe, they were attributable to Petersen's offense just plain sucking.dnc said:
I want to see Huff finish the year with a different OC. I think a lot of the OL struggles are attributable to Donovan. But I agree his seat should be hot.godawgst said:
I have seen enough of Huff at this point. He can recruit (one of 2 maybe 3 on staff) but development is not there.hardhat said:
Not a ringing endorsement of Huff
Without dramatic improvement post Donovan I'm on bored with moving on.
Bottome line for me is that, while I think Huff has been at a big disadvantage his entire time at UW and it's worse than ever now, it's time for him to go too. Full house cleaning time.
That said, he might be okay and he has worked for shitty offenses that started from the top down. In any case, he still needs to go. It’s a perfect time too. We have a bunch of highly recruited OL and a good coach should be able to make it a top tier OL. -
Future of Huff should be made by a new HC and new OC
-
If we could only combine Huffs recruiting with Straussers coachingFireCohen said:
Strauser could not recruit, but he could fucking coach. Holly fuck, I am reminiscing about strauserRoadDawg55 said:
He’s also had five years and hasn’t had a single OL that was better in 2016. The 2016 OL might have been lacking depth and got punked by Alabama, but they were mauling everyone else.chuck said:
His struggles are attributable to Lake. Before that, when the struggles weren't nearly so severe, they were attributable to Petersen's offense just plain sucking.dnc said:
I want to see Huff finish the year with a different OC. I think a lot of the OL struggles are attributable to Donovan. But I agree his seat should be hot.godawgst said:
I have seen enough of Huff at this point. He can recruit (one of 2 maybe 3 on staff) but development is not there.hardhat said:
Not a ringing endorsement of Huff
Without dramatic improvement post Donovan I'm on bored with moving on.
Bottome line for me is that, while I think Huff has been at a big disadvantage his entire time at UW and it's worse than ever now, it's time for him to go too. Full house cleaning time.
That said, he might be okay and he has worked for shitty offenses that started from the top down. In any case, he still needs to go. It’s a perfect time too. We have a bunch of highly recruited OL and a good coach should be able to make it a top tier OL. -
I'd take two OL coaches over two worthless DB coaches...JoeEDangerously said:
If we could only combine Huffs recruiting with Straussers coachingFireCohen said:
Strauser could not recruit, but he could fucking coach. Holly fuck, I am reminiscing about strauserRoadDawg55 said:
He’s also had five years and hasn’t had a single OL that was better in 2016. The 2016 OL might have been lacking depth and got punked by Alabama, but they were mauling everyone else.chuck said:
His struggles are attributable to Lake. Before that, when the struggles weren't nearly so severe, they were attributable to Petersen's offense just plain sucking.dnc said:
I want to see Huff finish the year with a different OC. I think a lot of the OL struggles are attributable to Donovan. But I agree his seat should be hot.godawgst said:
I have seen enough of Huff at this point. He can recruit (one of 2 maybe 3 on staff) but development is not there.hardhat said:
Not a ringing endorsement of Huff
Without dramatic improvement post Donovan I'm on bored with moving on.
Bottome line for me is that, while I think Huff has been at a big disadvantage his entire time at UW and it's worse than ever now, it's time for him to go too. Full house cleaning time.
That said, he might be okay and he has worked for shitty offenses that started from the top down. In any case, he still needs to go. It’s a perfect time too. We have a bunch of highly recruited OL and a good coach should be able to make it a top tier OL. -
-
Someone should let him know that the drive to Montlake is much shorter if his parents want to watch him lose to Stanford.dnc said:
