Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

How is Trump going to handle the immigration issue come election time?

oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
He's been an abysmal failure on this, his supposed signature issue. He's been nothing but talk and hot air. A big windbag. There is still no wall. Invaders are pouring in by the millions. His administration is either complicit or incompetent. Likely both. The other side is for open borders. So is Trump apparently. He's done NOTHING to stop the invasion. He's been so spineless that he even backed down on putting real pressure on the communist president of Mexico.

It will take some yuge action on his part to get many of his former supporters back on his side again, big action to get these supporters to pick up a ballot and vote him in again.
«134567

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,126
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Go back to your own country!
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Go back to your own country!

    Racist
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Yep. The DNC has shown themselves once again to not be very skilled at the winning an election part. For the moderator to tee' up the "raise your hand" question on immigration and health care was campaign suicide.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited July 2019

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Sounds like a manufactured scenario straight out of the NWO factory. Have the puppets one side, the leftists, take a stance that is so insane and outrageous as to make the stance of the puppets on the other side seem palatable. Trump's stance on this issue is talk a big game, but do nothing. That's not winning the argument. It's putting lipstick on a pig. In the end the result will be the same, because the US is controlled by the NWO. And the NWO wants the immigration invasion to continue.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Yep. The DNC has shown themselves once again to not be very skilled at the winning an election part. For the moderator to tee' up the "raise your hand" question on immigration and health care was campaign suicide.
    CNN has now obliged, there will be no more questions like that asked during the debate. The MSM is now going to help the Rats hide their positions on issues.

    Btw, why do you blame the moderator? Shouldn't the candidates be blamed for how they answered?
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    SFGbob said:

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Yep. The DNC has shown themselves once again to not be very skilled at the winning an election part. For the moderator to tee' up the "raise your hand" question on immigration and health care was campaign suicide.
    CNN has now obliged, there will be no more questions like that asked during the debate. The MSM is now going to help the Rats hide their positions on issues.

    Btw, why do you blame the moderator? Shouldn't the candidates be blamed for how they answered?
    Yes. They're all to blame.

    The moderator who asked those questions - the guy who asked a few questions in Spanish - I assume was hand picked as part of some hackneyed attempt at appearing ethnic and inclusive. Ok, fair enough. At least there's some strategy. But then he asks a question that is going to alienate the political center. Stupid.

    They don't need to ask that question. What are the people sympathetic to that view going to do? Vote for Trump?

    If the guy was actually representative of the Cuban community and it was in fact an attempt to cull the dummies and ID who will support paying for such a program, then I applaud them for at least being honest and transparent in running the debate. In that case, the DNC should have sent these idiots a memo about what happens when D candidates align themselves with fringe social issues and forget their historic working class base.

    I said this in another post: it's too back Hickenlooper is such a shadow and unknown. He has a solid background as a governor, and he seems to be a political moderate and maybe even lean a little to the right of center on the economy, more than once make his position on socialism known. But he probably doesn't stand a chance.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Yep. The DNC has shown themselves once again to not be very skilled at the winning an election part. For the moderator to tee' up the "raise your hand" question on immigration and health care was campaign suicide.
    CNN has now obliged, there will be no more questions like that asked during the debate. The MSM is now going to help the Rats hide their positions on issues.

    Btw, why do you blame the moderator? Shouldn't the candidates be blamed for how they answered?
    Yes. They're all to blame.

    The moderator who asked those questions - the guy who asked a few questions in Spanish - I assume was hand picked as part of some hackneyed attempt at appearing ethnic and inclusive. Ok, fair enough. At least there's some strategy. But then he asks a question that is going to alienate the political center. Stupid.

    They don't need to ask that question. What are the people sympathetic to that view going to do? Vote for Trump?

    If the guy was actually representative of the Cuban community and it was in fact an attempt to cull the dummies and ID who will support paying for such a program, then I applaud them for at least being honest and transparent in running the debate. In that case, the DNC should have sent these idiots a memo about what happens when D candidates align themselves with fringe social issues and forget their historic working class base.

    I said this in another post: it's too back Hickenlooper is such a shadow and unknown. He has a solid background as a governor, and he seems to be a political moderate and maybe even lean a little to the right of center on the economy, more than once make his position on socialism known. But he probably doesn't stand a chance.
    And he enjoys watching porn with his mother.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,258
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    First question to the Squad after their pity party today

    Can you explain to Trump voters why he's a racist and talk about the extra security you have now?

    Our independent media at work
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    edited July 2019

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Sounds like a manufactured scenario straight out of the NWO factory. Have the puppets one side, the leftists, take a stance that is so insane and outrageous as to make the stance of the puppets on the other side seem palatable. Trump's stance on this issue is talk a big game, but do nothing. That's not winning the argument. It's putting lipstick on a pig. In the end the result will be the same, because the US is controlled by the NWO. And the NWO wants the immigration invasion to continue.
    Yes and no...he picked his battles the first two of years and didn't pick immigration because the establishment Republicans didn't want it (any fix with them would have involved giving "Dreamers" and such amnesty which would go over like a lead brick with his base) and its a good wedge issue (i.e. look at how nutzo the Left has gotten on it).

    He campaigns on winning the house by fixing it and actually wins the house he will have to do something...its gotten bad enough his base might not even scream about the Dreamers as much.

    I would guess part of his problem is that he thought if he did tax cuts and "fixed" immigration (in a half-assed way because Paul Ryan and company wouldn't have signed off on much) in the first 2 years he's have nothing to run on (and would have pissed off part of his base) and would be a lame duck...don't agree, but my opinion isn't important.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Sounds like a manufactured scenario straight out of the NWO factory. Have the puppets one side, the leftists, take a stance that is so insane and outrageous as to make the stance of the puppets on the other side seem palatable. Trump's stance on this issue is talk a big game, but do nothing. That's not winning the argument. It's putting lipstick on a pig. In the end the result will be the same, because the US is controlled by the NWO. And the NWO wants the immigration invasion to continue.
    Yes and no...he picked his battles the first two of years and didn't pick immigration because the establishment Republicans didn't want it (any fix with them would have involved giving "Dreamers" and such amnesty which would go over like a lead brick with his base) and its a good wedge issue (i.e. look at how nutzo the Left has gotten on it).

    He campaigns on winning the house by fixing it and actually wins the house he will have to do something...its gotten bad enough his base might not even scream about the Dreamers as much.

    I would guess part of his problem is that he thought if he did tax cuts and "fixed" immigration (in a half-assed way because Paul Ryan and company wouldn't have signed off on much) in the first 2 years he's have nothing to run on (and would have pissed off part of his base) and would be a lame duck...don't agree, but my opinion isn't important.
    Paul Cryin was a problem he should have dealt with immediately. He could have applied more pressure to have that clown removed from his post and replaced.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes

    Doubt it...you have the other side wanting to decriminalizing all illegal immigration and offering to give all illegal immigrants free health care. Hell, you had a chunk of them cross the boarder and campaign with the illegals.

    Trump will win that argument easy...

    Sounds like a manufactured scenario straight out of the NWO factory. Have the puppets one side, the leftists, take a stance that is so insane and outrageous as to make the stance of the puppets on the other side seem palatable. Trump's stance on this issue is talk a big game, but do nothing. That's not winning the argument. It's putting lipstick on a pig. In the end the result will be the same, because the US is controlled by the NWO. And the NWO wants the immigration invasion to continue.
    Yes and no...he picked his battles the first two of years and didn't pick immigration because the establishment Republicans didn't want it (any fix with them would have involved giving "Dreamers" and such amnesty which would go over like a lead brick with his base) and its a good wedge issue (i.e. look at how nutzo the Left has gotten on it).

    He campaigns on winning the house by fixing it and actually wins the house he will have to do something...its gotten bad enough his base might not even scream about the Dreamers as much.

    I would guess part of his problem is that he thought if he did tax cuts and "fixed" immigration (in a half-assed way because Paul Ryan and company wouldn't have signed off on much) in the first 2 years he's have nothing to run on (and would have pissed off part of his base) and would be a lame duck...don't agree, but my opinion isn't important.
    Paul Cryin was a problem he should have dealt with immediately. He could have applied more pressure to have that clown removed from his post and replaced.
    Yeah, but the backdrop of the fake Russia narrative prevented a lot of things from happening...half of his own party was on board with that fraud and ready to run him out of office. He had no political capital at the time. Heck, he couldn’t even get his own party to remove/replace Obamacare and they all ran on that.
  • Options
    DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited July 2019
    Michigan Swing Voters Blast 2020 Democrats on Immigration: ‘We Need to Focus on Americans’


    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/15/michigan-swing-voters-blast-2020-democrats-on-immigration-we-need-to-focus-on-americans/


    “Michigan swing voters are, by a majority, siding with President Trump’s “America First” immigration agenda and blasting plans by 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidates to open the United States-Mexico border, decriminalize illegal immigration, and provide free healthcare to all illegal aliens.

    An Axios report which chronicled a focus group of Michigan swing voters — those who voted for Mitt Romney in 2012, but switched to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and those who voted for Barack Obama twice, but switched to vote for Trump in 2016 — finds that by a majority these voters prefer Trump’s low-immigration, high-wage economic model as opposed to the 2020 Democrats’ plans to allow an unlimited flow of foreign workers to the country, legally and illegally.”

    A recent Zogby Analytics poll, conducted for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, surveyed Michigan voters on a number of immigration issues and found that a majority support Trump’s immigration agenda.

    For instance, more than 54 percent of Michigan voters said they support ending the country’s mass importation of legal low-wage foreign workers, nearly half said they support ending the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country, 77 percent said they support a nationwide ban on employers hiring illegal aliens, and 55 percent said they are more likely to support a 2020 presidential candidate who agrees with the details of these plans.
  • Options
    DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Nationwide, mandatory E-Verify — the system that bans employers and businesses from hiring illegal aliens over American workers — is supported by at least 3-in-4 likely U.S. voters in six swing states, a new poll finds.

    Mandatory E-Verify, which is part of President Trump’s most recent immigration plan, gets sweeping support from the overwhelming majority of likely American voters in swing states such as Arizona, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.



    The latest Zogby Analytics poll conducted for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) finds that across these six swing states, support for nationwide, mandatory E-Verify ranges from 75 percent to nearly 82 percent among all likely voters.
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    DJDuck said:

    Michigan Swing Voters Blast 2020 Democrats on Immigration: ‘We Need to Focus on Americans’


    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/15/michigan-swing-voters-blast-2020-democrats-on-immigration-we-need-to-focus-on-americans/


    “Michigan swing voters are, by a majority, siding with President Trump’s “America First” immigration agenda and blasting plans by 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidates to open the United States-Mexico border, decriminalize illegal immigration, and provide free healthcare to all illegal aliens.

    An Axios report which chronicled a focus group of Michigan swing voters — those who voted for Mitt Romney in 2012, but switched to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and those who voted for Barack Obama twice, but switched to vote for Trump in 2016 — finds that by a majority these voters prefer Trump’s low-immigration, high-wage economic model as opposed to the 2020 Democrats’ plans to allow an unlimited flow of foreign workers to the country, legally and illegally.”

    A recent Zogby Analytics poll, conducted for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, surveyed Michigan voters on a number of immigration issues and found that a majority support Trump’s immigration agenda.

    For instance, more than 54 percent of Michigan voters said they support ending the country’s mass importation of legal low-wage foreign workers, nearly half said they support ending the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country, 77 percent said they support a nationwide ban on employers hiring illegal aliens, and 55 percent said they are more likely to support a 2020 presidential candidate who agrees with the details of these plans.

    trump is polling in the toilet in Michigan
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary

    He's been an abysmal failure on this, his supposed signature issue. He's been nothing but talk and hot air. A big windbag. There is still no wall. Invaders are pouring in by the millions. His administration is either complicit or incompetent. Likely both. The other side is for open borders. So is Trump apparently. He's done NOTHING to stop the invasion. He's been so spineless that he even backed down on putting real pressure on the communist president of Mexico.

    It will take some yuge action on his part to get many of his former supporters back on his side again, big action to get these supporters to pick up a ballot and vote him in again.

    who would have thought his "close the borders" nonsense would actually increase illegal immigration?

    you are right that trump has failed on his signature issue.
  • Options
    DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited July 2019
    The original question posited to start this thread reminds me of the famous Pauline Kael quote.


    The Actual Pauline Kael Quote—Not As Bad, and Worse


    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/culture-civilization/the-actual-pauline-kael-quote—not-as-bad-and-worse/

    “The clearest example of the bizarrely naive quality of hermetic liberal provincialism was attributed to the New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael almost 40 years ago, and has been discussed in right-wing circles ever since. It went something like this: “I can’t believe Nixon won. I don’t know anyone who voted for him.” Several years ago, I went on an admittedly desultory search for the original quote and was unable to locate it.”
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Incompetent treasonous dotardcrats like Gavin Newsome are responsible for the increase in illegal immigration by promises of free health care and other widely publicized incentives for illegals to come here. Trump is responsible for not having Gavin Newsome and other sanctuary state governors and sanctuary city mayors arrested, and for not sending troops to border to stop the invasion and to threaten Mexico.
  • Options
    DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    edited July 2019
    dhdawg said:

    DJDuck said:

    Michigan Swing Voters Blast 2020 Democrats on Immigration: ‘We Need to Focus on Americans’


    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/15/michigan-swing-voters-blast-2020-democrats-on-immigration-we-need-to-focus-on-americans/


    “Michigan swing voters are, by a majority, siding with President Trump’s “America First” immigration agenda and blasting plans by 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidates to open the United States-Mexico border, decriminalize illegal immigration, and provide free healthcare to all illegal aliens.

    An Axios report which chronicled a focus group of Michigan swing voters — those who voted for Mitt Romney in 2012, but switched to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and those who voted for Barack Obama twice, but switched to vote for Trump in 2016 — finds that by a majority these voters prefer Trump’s low-immigration, high-wage economic model as opposed to the 2020 Democrats’ plans to allow an unlimited flow of foreign workers to the country, legally and illegally.”

    A recent Zogby Analytics poll, conducted for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, surveyed Michigan voters on a number of immigration issues and found that a majority support Trump’s immigration agenda.

    For instance, more than 54 percent of Michigan voters said they support ending the country’s mass importation of legal low-wage foreign workers, nearly half said they support ending the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country, 77 percent said they support a nationwide ban on employers hiring illegal aliens, and 55 percent said they are more likely to support a 2020 presidential candidate who agrees with the details of these plans.

    trump is polling in the toilet in Michigan
    dhdawg said:

    DJDuck said:

    Michigan Swing Voters Blast 2020 Democrats on Immigration: ‘We Need to Focus on Americans’


    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/15/michigan-swing-voters-blast-2020-democrats-on-immigration-we-need-to-focus-on-americans/


    “Michigan swing voters are, by a majority, siding with President Trump’s “America First” immigration agenda and blasting plans by 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidates to open the United States-Mexico border, decriminalize illegal immigration, and provide free healthcare to all illegal aliens.

    An Axios report which chronicled a focus group of Michigan swing voters — those who voted for Mitt Romney in 2012, but switched to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and those who voted for Barack Obama twice, but switched to vote for Trump in 2016 — finds that by a majority these voters prefer Trump’s low-immigration, high-wage economic model as opposed to the 2020 Democrats’ plans to allow an unlimited flow of foreign workers to the country, legally and illegally.”

    A recent Zogby Analytics poll, conducted for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, surveyed Michigan voters on a number of immigration issues and found that a majority support Trump’s immigration agenda.

    For instance, more than 54 percent of Michigan voters said they support ending the country’s mass importation of legal low-wage foreign workers, nearly half said they support ending the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country, 77 percent said they support a nationwide ban on employers hiring illegal aliens, and 55 percent said they are more likely to support a 2020 presidential candidate who agrees with the details of these plans.

    trump is polling in the toilet in Michigan
    Obviously not because of illegal immigration, that is the theme of this thread if you missed it.

    The unfortunate fact is that Democrats are underwater on the immigration issue like almost every policy position.

Sign In or Register to comment.