Vega Ioane, 2022 3* OL, Graham (Graham-Kapowsin), WA (respect his decision)
Comments
-
Yeah I don't think a huge class makes any sense at all, unless simply taking players to take them makes sense. Over crowd any one position group in a single class now and you're only guaranteeing more transfers later. Three or four is enough as long as they're guys you want.PapaBrailsford said:
Everything that I've read suggests that we are done with the OL unless Conerly decides to commit...but I agree, he who controls the line of scrimmage wins (usually).huskyhooligan said:Huff has or should have a lot of layups this year. Which isn't to discredit him at all. I'm definitely getting a get in before there isn't room vibe looking at our current OL commits. I'd be a fan of a huge OLine class as I'm a firm believer dominant O-Line = efficient offense, despite who some of the skill position players are. Not rocket science. Hoping this helps with a few of the others.
-
UW only took 2 OL last cycle, need 4 this cycle ideally
-
Vega is a cool name too.
-
Lose four OL to graduation this year. Logic suggests you probably lose at least one more to transfer or injury. Only took two last year. I still want to push for Conerly, Agbo, and Iuli and I will hear of nothing less.NEsnake12 said:UW only took 2 OL last cycle, need 4 this cycle ideally
-
Replacing transfers with recruits doesn't make sense at all to me. You want three or so OL on the roster per class and to stay around 16 total imo. Recruit 3-4 every year and replace transfers with transfers who have the same eligibility.WoolleyDoog said:
Lose four OL to graduation this year. Logic suggests you probably lose at least one more to transfer or injury. Only took two last year. I still want to push for Conerly, Agbo, and Iuli and I will hear of nothing less.NEsnake12 said:UW only took 2 OL last cycle, need 4 this cycle ideally
Seems easy. -
Any idea of the staff’s confidence level with Conerly to pair with your son?PapaBrailsford said:
Everything that I've read suggests that we are done with the OL unless Conerly decides to commit...but I agree, he who controls the line of scrimmage wins (usually).huskyhooligan said:Huff has or should have a lot of layups this year. Which isn't to discredit him at all. I'm definitely getting a get in before there isn't room vibe looking at our current OL commits. I'd be a fan of a huge OLine class as I'm a firm believer dominant O-Line = efficient offense, despite who some of the skill position players are. Not rocket science. Hoping this helps with a few of the others.
-
I think we’re sitting okay.Beno4Life said:
Any idea of the staff’s confidence level with Conerly to pair with your son?PapaBrailsford said:
Everything that I've read suggests that we are done with the OL unless Conerly decides to commit...but I agree, he who controls the line of scrimmage wins (usually).huskyhooligan said:Huff has or should have a lot of layups this year. Which isn't to discredit him at all. I'm definitely getting a get in before there isn't room vibe looking at our current OL commits. I'd be a fan of a huge OLine class as I'm a firm believer dominant O-Line = efficient offense, despite who some of the skill position players are. Not rocket science. Hoping this helps with a few of the others.
-
If you believe the 3 OT’s that are in state are legit I say you go after them snd get what you can while you can. 3 is overkill but I would be fine with 2. Let the cream rise to the top.chuck said:
Yeah I don't think a huge class makes any sense at all, unless simply taking players to take them makes sense. Over crowd any one position group in a single class now and you're only guaranteeing more transfers later. Three or four is enough as long as they're guys you want.PapaBrailsford said:
Everything that I've read suggests that we are done with the OL unless Conerly decides to commit...but I agree, he who controls the line of scrimmage wins (usually).huskyhooligan said:Huff has or should have a lot of layups this year. Which isn't to discredit him at all. I'm definitely getting a get in before there isn't room vibe looking at our current OL commits. I'd be a fan of a huge OLine class as I'm a firm believer dominant O-Line = efficient offense, despite who some of the skill position players are. Not rocket science. Hoping this helps with a few of the others.
With Jon don’s offense we only need like 5 wr’s on scholarship and any OL that can’t cut it will be moved to H-Back anyways. Everybody wins. -
I hope Huff gets whatever he wants when it comes time to extend his contract.
-
I'm sure this has been answered elsewhere, but is that his little brother or.....Quietcowskee said:
I think we’re sitting okay.Beno4Life said:
Any idea of the staff’s confidence level with Conerly to pair with your son?PapaBrailsford said:
Everything that I've read suggests that we are done with the OL unless Conerly decides to commit...but I agree, he who controls the line of scrimmage wins (usually).huskyhooligan said:Huff has or should have a lot of layups this year. Which isn't to discredit him at all. I'm definitely getting a get in before there isn't room vibe looking at our current OL commits. I'd be a fan of a huge OLine class as I'm a firm believer dominant O-Line = efficient offense, despite who some of the skill position players are. Not rocket science. Hoping this helps with a few of the others.
