Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

First and Sad...

1568101114

Comments

  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,753
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited February 2018

    salemcoog said:
    I can picture you in your Camaro or Firebird Bronco cruising the strip in Salem rocking Night Ranger.
    And it was Riverside in Ol Spokaloo.
  • Options
    WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,742
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    I think the mental health crisis is about societal conditions, and probably largely driven by media as some have said. That is an extremely complex problem that cannot be solved quickly.

    But in the interim, in fact in the interim and beyond, I think a civilian ban on assault weapons/magazines is pragmatic. Standard capacity semi auto handguns and standard capacity recreational weapons can stick around with background checks and some level of pre-sale mandatory safety training. I don't think anyone will ever convince me that an assault weapon is practical and necessary outside of military or paramilitary use.
  • Options
    BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 4,969
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    BearsWiin said:

    salemcoog said:
    I can picture you in your Camaro or Firebird cruising the strip in Salem rocking Night Ranger.
    We did that on McHenry in Modesto in a '66 Buick Electra 225
    You and Lucas?
    Back in his day it was 10th Street, not McHenry. He was Downey '63, I was Davis '86.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,975
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    I think the mental health crisis is about societal conditions, and probably largely driven by media as some have said. That is an extremely complex problem that cannot be solved quickly.

    But in the interim, in fact in the interim and beyond, I think a civilian ban on assault weapons/magazines is pragmatic. Standard capacity semi auto handguns and standard capacity recreational weapons can stick around with background checks and some level of pre-sale mandatory safety training. I don't think anyone will ever convince me that an assault weapon is practical and necessary outside of military or paramilitary use.
    So you support a ban of assault weapons from local police forces? including federal agencies like Bureau of Land Management?

    If so, I'm willing to trade.

    If not, I'm going to cling to the 2nd Amendment with every fiber of my being.
  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,275
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.


  • Options
    UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,108
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Answer
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    Not cut mental health funding for one.

    Was the kid on any drugs?
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    There were warnings from the shooter himself. FBI was notified. They were probably too busy running wire taps to do anything.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/15/nikolas-cruz-school-shooter-comment-reported-to-fbi-months-ago-vlogger-says.html

    What no one ever mentions is that almost all of the school shooters were on antidepressants. Listen to the warning speech during the next commercial for one. The problem is a mental health issue more than anything else. All the students knew this kid was a nut job. The school knew it as well. Now we know the FBI was warned about him and yet he carried out his plans.

    The Israeli's in the 70's suffered numerous terrorist attacks at schools, school buses, field trips etc. They solved the problem. They armed some of the teachers. Terrorists didn't like their nice soft targets shooting back.

    The mass shooting stats up above are misleading as everyone has a different definition of mass shooting, school shooting etc. Anti gun groups even count anything near a school.

    I checked my guns this morning. They were all still where i left them. Hadn't killed anyone or left the premises. They are only as good, evil or crazy as the person using them.


    And for the Franny.

    Stop trying to shed light on the real problem here, which is mental health.


    It really detracts from Boobs and fleas simplistic blame it on Trump,Republicans and the mere existence of firearms.
    You worthless fucking cunt. I simply said Trump was a fuckhead for easing restrictions on mentally ill people getting guns. Nothing more.

    The rest of your cunty fucking post is just you being the retarded cunt you are.

    It would be great if someone shot your dumb fucking ass instead of a bunch of kids.

    Go fuck yourself.
    I'm hearing water is wet.
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    I think the mental health crisis is about societal conditions, and probably largely driven by media as some have said. That is an extremely complex problem that cannot be solved quickly.

    But in the interim, in fact in the interim and beyond, I think a civilian ban on assault weapons/magazines is pragmatic. Standard capacity semi auto handguns and standard capacity recreational weapons can stick around with background checks and some level of pre-sale mandatory safety training. I don't think anyone will ever convince me that an assault weapon is practical and necessary outside of military or paramilitary use.
    So you support a ban of assault weapons from local police forces? including federal agencies like Bureau of Land Management?

    If so, I'm willing to trade.

    If not, I'm going to cling to the 2nd Amendment with every fiber of my being.
    Paramilitary use includes SWAT so technically that part of the police force would be fine. I don't think regular patrolmen need assault weapons, but I could be talked in to high capacity mags for their service weapons along with the pump shotty that most have in the back of the squad car. That should be plenty to suppress a shooter until SWAT gets there. I don't know why the BLM would need AR's, but if there was a case I would listen.

    The irony about police is that from a 2nd amendment, protecting yourself from tyranny standpoint, the militarization of local police forces is something citizens should be 100x more worried about than the federal government.
    Dude, there are, like, four guys on this bored who understand the point you're making, and @BearsWiin doesn't count because he only pops in once in a while and will likely miss it. So make it three.

    Sled just checked his guns and they haven't hurt anyone. Even the AKs. Just sitting their minding their own bidness.

  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,275
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    I think the mental health crisis is about societal conditions, and probably largely driven by media as some have said. That is an extremely complex problem that cannot be solved quickly.

    But in the interim, in fact in the interim and beyond, I think a civilian ban on assault weapons/magazines is pragmatic. Standard capacity semi auto handguns and standard capacity recreational weapons can stick around with background checks and some level of pre-sale mandatory safety training. I don't think anyone will ever convince me that an assault weapon is practical and necessary outside of military or paramilitary use.
    So you support a ban of assault weapons from local police forces? including federal agencies like Bureau of Land Management?

    If so, I'm willing to trade.

    If not, I'm going to cling to the 2nd Amendment with every fiber of my being.
    Paramilitary use includes SWAT so technically that part of the police force would be fine. I don't think regular patrolmen need assault weapons, but I could be talked in to high capacity mags for their service weapons along with the pump shotty that most have in the back of the squad car. That should be plenty to suppress a shooter until SWAT gets there. I don't know why the BLM would need AR's, but if there was a case I would listen.

    The irony about police is that from a 2nd amendment, protecting yourself from tyranny standpoint, the militarization of local police forces is something citizens should be 100x more worried about than the federal government.
    Dude, there are, like, four guys on this bored who understand the point you're making, and @BearsWiin doesn't count because he only pops in once in a while and will likely miss it. So make it three.

    Sled just checked his guns and they haven't hurt anyone. Even the AKs. Just sitting their minding their own bidness.

    Can I be one of the three amigos that get it?


  • Options
    WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,742
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    I think the mental health crisis is about societal conditions, and probably largely driven by media as some have said. That is an extremely complex problem that cannot be solved quickly.

    But in the interim, in fact in the interim and beyond, I think a civilian ban on assault weapons/magazines is pragmatic. Standard capacity semi auto handguns and standard capacity recreational weapons can stick around with background checks and some level of pre-sale mandatory safety training. I don't think anyone will ever convince me that an assault weapon is practical and necessary outside of military or paramilitary use.
    So you support a ban of assault weapons from local police forces? including federal agencies like Bureau of Land Management?

    If so, I'm willing to trade.

    If not, I'm going to cling to the 2nd Amendment with every fiber of my being.
    Paramilitary use includes SWAT so technically that part of the police force would be fine. I don't think regular patrolmen need assault weapons, but I could be talked in to high capacity mags for their service weapons along with the pump shotty that most have in the back of the squad car. That should be plenty to suppress a shooter until SWAT gets there. I don't know why the BLM would need AR's, but if there was a case I would listen.

    The irony about police is that from a 2nd amendment, protecting yourself from tyranny standpoint, the militarization of local police forces is something citizens should be 100x more worried about than the federal government.
    Dude, there are, like, four guys on this bored who understand the point you're making, and @BearsWiin doesn't count because he only pops in once in a while and will likely miss it. So make it three.

    Sled just checked his guns and they haven't hurt anyone. Even the AKs. Just sitting their minding their own bidness.

    Thats because @BearsWiin is too busy getting roasted by his own kid.
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,753
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    There were warnings from the shooter himself. FBI was notified. They were probably too busy running wire taps to do anything.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/15/nikolas-cruz-school-shooter-comment-reported-to-fbi-months-ago-vlogger-says.html

    What no one ever mentions is that almost all of the school shooters were on antidepressants. Listen to the warning speech during the next commercial for one. The problem is a mental health issue more than anything else. All the students knew this kid was a nut job. The school knew it as well. Now we know the FBI was warned about him and yet he carried out his plans.

    The Israeli's in the 70's suffered numerous terrorist attacks at schools, school buses, field trips etc. They solved the problem. They armed some of the teachers. Terrorists didn't like their nice soft targets shooting back.

    The mass shooting stats up above are misleading as everyone has a different definition of mass shooting, school shooting etc. Anti gun groups even count anything near a school.

    I checked my guns this morning. They were all still where i left them. Hadn't killed anyone or left the premises. They are only as good, evil or crazy as the person using them.


    And for the Franny.

    Stop trying to shed light on the real problem here, which is mental health.


    It really detracts from Boobs and fleas simplistic blame it on Trump,Republicans and the mere existence of firearms.
    You worthless fucking cunt. I simply said Trump was a fuckhead for easing restrictions on mentally ill people getting guns. Nothing more.

    The rest of your cunty fucking post is just you being the retarded cunt you are.

    It would be great if someone shot your dumb fucking ass instead of a bunch of kids.

    Go fuck yourself.
    Somebody learned a new word.


    Doesn't matter...



    You're still a closeted fag.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,780
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    LebamDawg said:

    don't see how something like this can happen in a drug free and gun free zone. the kid probly didn't take his anti-depressants or he took too many...

    THIS is the issue. We bitch and moan about gun control - but, honestly, how many of these fucks have serious mental issues that we(?) have been shamed into pitying and handling with kid gloves?

    Some of these fucks needs lobotomized or institutionalized. I don't have the answer for who decides or how that happens - but extracting these poor tormented souls from the general populace certainly would decrease this kind of shit from happening.

    Not really a fan of people control any more than I'm a fan of gun control.

    It's not like one would be any easier or constitutionally sound than the other, either.
    But if we? were serious it has to be both. Content control too. A lot of things we aren't willing to give up. Its far easier to offer ts and ps or rail about gun control. Neither of which does much

    If you go back to before mass consumption of media we were a far less violent country.

    Aren't violent crime rates down these days?

    I'm sure there are cherry picked statistics that say that, compared to 1975 or something. But that's the shit politicians love to say to paper over the fact that some asshole just killed a bunch of innocent kids, as though those killings represent a statistical improvement since the old, more violent days. So, all you people who didn't get shot can relax, because you're actually quite safe. Statistically.
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,753
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    LebamDawg said:

    don't see how something like this can happen in a drug free and gun free zone. the kid probly didn't take his anti-depressants or he took too many...

    THIS is the issue. We bitch and moan about gun control - but, honestly, how many of these fucks have serious mental issues that we(?) have been shamed into pitying and handling with kid gloves?

    Some of these fucks needs lobotomized or institutionalized. I don't have the answer for who decides or how that happens - but extracting these poor tormented souls from the general populace certainly would decrease this kind of shit from happening.

    Not really a fan of people control any more than I'm a fan of gun control.

    It's not like one would be any easier or constitutionally sound than the other, either.
    But if we? were serious it has to be both. Content control too. A lot of things we aren't willing to give up. Its far easier to offer ts and ps or rail about gun control. Neither of which does much

    If you go back to before mass consumption of media we were a far less violent country.

    Aren't violent crime rates down these days?

    I'm sure there are cherry picked statistics that say that, compared to 1975 or something. But that's the shit politicians love to say to paper over the fact that some asshole just killed a bunch of innocent kids, as though those killings represent a statistical improvement since the old, more violent days. So, all you people who didn't get shot can relax, because you're actually quite safe. Statistically.
    True. Your odds of getting shot on a plane are much lower than getting shot in school.
  • Options
    BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 4,969
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    This is your ideal society?
    Pragmatic is the word you're looking for.
    Personally, I think trying to solve the root problem is better than accepting guns in schools and teachers trained as shooters as pragmatic.
    That's fair. How do you plan to solve the mental health crisis in America? More drugs clearly isn't working.


    In the interim, we need a pragmatic solution that will work. This solution is the pink elephant the left doesn't want to talk about.
    I think the mental health crisis is about societal conditions, and probably largely driven by media as some have said. That is an extremely complex problem that cannot be solved quickly.

    But in the interim, in fact in the interim and beyond, I think a civilian ban on assault weapons/magazines is pragmatic. Standard capacity semi auto handguns and standard capacity recreational weapons can stick around with background checks and some level of pre-sale mandatory safety training. I don't think anyone will ever convince me that an assault weapon is practical and necessary outside of military or paramilitary use.
    So you support a ban of assault weapons from local police forces? including federal agencies like Bureau of Land Management?

    If so, I'm willing to trade.

    If not, I'm going to cling to the 2nd Amendment with every fiber of my being.
    Paramilitary use includes SWAT so technically that part of the police force would be fine. I don't think regular patrolmen need assault weapons, but I could be talked in to high capacity mags for their service weapons along with the pump shotty that most have in the back of the squad car. That should be plenty to suppress a shooter until SWAT gets there. I don't know why the BLM would need AR's, but if there was a case I would listen.

    The irony about police is that from a 2nd amendment, protecting yourself from tyranny standpoint, the militarization of local police forces is something citizens should be 100x more worried about than the federal government.
    Dude, there are, like, four guys on this bored who understand the point you're making, and @BearsWiin doesn't count because he only pops in once in a while and will likely miss it. So make it three.

    Sled just checked his guns and they haven't hurt anyone. Even the AKs. Just sitting their minding their own bidness.

    Thats because @BearsWiin is too busy getting roasted by his own kid.
    He's turning out to be a fun kid. He especially enjoyed it during yesterday's carpool when he told my youngest that he was being annoying by repeatedly complaining about my traffic choices, and I gently told him that he was doing it all wrong, then turned around and yelled FUCK YOUR OWN FACE at a dB level that probably made the other two kids in the car pee themselves a bit.

    But yeah, that police force militarization comment was just another in a long line of WTF I JUST GOTTA RESPOND TO THIS lines in this thread that I just have to bite my tongue and tell myself that it just isn't worth it
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,780
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    Yes if there is one thing that mass shooters that usually commit suicide are scared of, it's dying.

    No one has done this expecting to get away.
    I think that's well known. The idea is to stop them immediately. Waiting for help to arrive means more time for the killer to carry out his crime. Average response time in most larger cities to a high priority call is 8 minutes. Rural areas can be 20 minutes to and hour.
    No The answer is to stop it before it happens. You can't rely on someone off site to stop it once it starts. Almost all of these little fucks have laid a trail of bread crumbs as to what they are going to do, but no one steps up and turns them in.
    The best way to stop it before it happens is to take away the guns.
    Everyone's?

    How?
    Modify the second amendment to ban assault rifles.

    This will never happen of course, because we have chosen to make gun fanatics more important than children.
    I never realized, until this very moment, that Boobs was a girl.
    Serious question with no agenda, what does a semi auto AR provide you personally that a bolt or lever action rifle does not, other than less reloading?
    Serious answer: Speed.

    Although I'm really not into ARs. I was brought up with old school rifles & revolvers, and taught by WW2 and Korean War vets who made their own bullets in kitchens that probably lead-poisoned the fuck out of me.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,780
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    I'd feel safer if a few teachers on campus were knowingly armed, or had access to guns in strategically located gun safes within the school. Radical? Who GAF. Cowards like this crazy little fucker thrive when they know there won't be anyone shooting back at them. Let it be known that some teachers are well-trained and armed, and most of these shootings don't happen.

    Yes if there is one thing that mass shooters that usually commit suicide are scared of, it's dying.

    No one has done this expecting to get away.
    I think that's well known. The idea is to stop them immediately. Waiting for help to arrive means more time for the killer to carry out his crime. Average response time in most larger cities to a high priority call is 8 minutes. Rural areas can be 20 minutes to and hour.
    No The answer is to stop it before it happens. You can't rely on someone off site to stop it once it starts. Almost all of these little fucks have laid a trail of bread crumbs as to what they are going to do, but no one steps up and turns them in.
    The best way to stop it before it happens is to take away the guns.
    Everyone's?

    How?
    Modify the second amendment to ban assault rifles.

    This will never happen of course, because we have chosen to make gun fanatics more important than children.
    I never realized, until this very moment, that Boobs was a girl.
    Serious question with no agenda, what does a semi auto AR provide you personally that a bolt or lever action rifle does not, other than less reloading?
    The ability to obliterate a half rack of empty cans with one squeeze,,, duh???
    Hilarious. I actually wrote a sentence in my last post about my AR buddies who prefer to destroy targets than hit the center of them. But I deleted it. Guess I shouldn't have.

    "You should see what this does to a watermelon." A line spoken many, many times in E. Washington.
  • Options
    dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,221
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    There were warnings from the shooter himself. FBI was notified. They were probably too busy running wire taps to do anything.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/15/nikolas-cruz-school-shooter-comment-reported-to-fbi-months-ago-vlogger-says.html

    What no one ever mentions is that almost all of the school shooters were on antidepressants. Listen to the warning speech during the next commercial for one. The problem is a mental health issue more than anything else. All the students knew this kid was a nut job. The school knew it as well. Now we know the FBI was warned about him and yet he carried out his plans.

    The Israeli's in the 70's suffered numerous terrorist attacks at schools, school buses, field trips etc. They solved the problem. They armed some of the teachers. Terrorists didn't like their nice soft targets shooting back.

    The mass shooting stats up above are misleading as everyone has a different definition of mass shooting, school shooting etc. Anti gun groups even count anything near a school.

    I checked my guns this morning. They were all still where i left them. Hadn't killed anyone or left the premises. They are only as good, evil or crazy as the person using them.


    And for the Franny.

    Stop trying to shed light on the real problem here, which is mental health.


    It really detracts from Boobs and fleas simplistic blame it on Trump,Republicans and the mere existence of firearms.
    You worthless fucking cunt. I simply said Trump was a fuckhead for easing restrictions on mentally ill people getting guns. Nothing more.

    The rest of your cunty fucking post is just you being the retarded cunt you are.

    It would be great if someone shot your dumb fucking ass instead of a bunch of kids.

    Go fuck yourself.
    Somebody learned a new word.


    Doesn't matter...



    You're still a closeted fag.
    It's not new. I've been calling you a cunt for years.

    That's because you are one.
Sign In or Register to comment.