Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?
Comments
-
NoI don't have a stake in anything. I am a consumer. I don't own Husky football and neither do you. I choose not to pay for a shit product until they decide to produce a better one. Whose dick did you suck to get your MBA?
-
Yes
Are you an alum?PurpleJ said:I don't have a stake in anything. I am a consumer. I don't own Husky football and neither do you. I choose not to pay for a shit product until they decide to produce a better one. Whose dick did you suck to get your MBA?
Do you watch the product?
Do you attend games?
Does the subject of UW sports and in particular UW football take up your time?
Those are just a handful of questions that if you answer yes to you are a stakeholder of the product whether you want to agree with that or not.
Again, I don't care what you do with your time or money ...
But thanks for once again proving that you have no clue what you are talking about -
Let's debate it WHEN and IF it happens.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
10 wins means 6-3 in conference.HuskyInAZ said:
Your an idiot. WGAF who they win or lose to. Are you suggesting that beating Oregon/Stanford would be better than losing to Arizona/WSU? 10 wins would be huge, and who those wins come against, IDGAF.HuskiesADW said:Win 10+ or GTFO.
Well even if he wins 10+ it still depends on how we win/lose. If every win is pretty close and we get blown out by both Oregon/Stanford than GTFO.
That's a crap season.
I expect 10+ win seasons every year, especially with the shit non-confrence opponents on the schedule and playing 9 Pac-12 teams.FremontTroll said:
Just because every other PAC school has won 10 games more recently than UW you think it's reasonable to expect 10 win seasons more than once every 16 years?Baseman said:
Show me 10 wins. It's been 16 years. Even with this horseshit schedule, it's a giant step up forward. Until then, fuck off.PurpleJ said:10 wins with this schedule, assuming one is the NOGAF Bowl, is not that impressive. That means you swept your shitty non-conference schedule and went 6-3 in one of the worst major conferences in the nation, likely with all three losses coming to actual contenders. It would be incremental progress and enough to buy him year 4, but I wouldn't be impressed or satisfied with that.
Win 10 this year and let's debate if Pete might be the guy. He could be. But as it stands now, he's an overpaid and overhyped charlatan. -
NoWe all watch the games and at times come here to talk Husky Football. How is anyone here a bandwagon fan?
Nobody thinks you aren't a loyal fan Tequilla. You are. You're just a dumbass doog who thinks being optimistic makes you a better fan. -
NoYou've missed my point here you dumb ass fucking donkey. Using being a stakeholder as a basis for your argument here is fucktarded. You should know that it's the money that matters here, not whether I waste my time talking about it on the internet.
The only thing you listed there that contributes to the bottom line is the tickets, and I won't buy anything but second hand tickets that were already purchased buy someone else (usually a sad sap that was stupid enough to buy season tickets). I don't have a ratings box on my TV and I doubt the advertising from a single TV watching the game contributes much to the TV contract or advertising dollars.
Again. Whose dick did you have to suck to get your MBA? -
NoLet's get back to talking about our standard for the program and whether we think Pete is the guy. God knows the gutless pussies in charge will never hold anyone to those standards, but it's sure fun to commiserate together with irrelevant banter.
-
No
We aren't reacting to an "alternate view", we are mocking your long winded history of lapping up whatever the program serves you like a good little doog.Tequilla said:
I have absolutely no problem with anybody that has made the decision to pull their support with time, money, etc ... personal decision for all to make.ThomasFremont said:
All the Boston Red Sox fans in Seattle are the definition of "bandwagon".Tequilla said:
If "I've given up on the program until they win" isn't the definition of a bandwagon statement, then ISIS probably wasn't responsible for the bombings in Turkey eitherThomasFremont said:
Except it's not.Tequilla said:
I don't care where he stands and when he gets on or off ...ThomasFremont said:
Are you gonna let Roadie back on the bandwagon?Tequilla said:
Translation: BandwagonRoadDawg55 said:If the offense is better, the defense will be worse and/or have key guys injured. Or we lose 4 or 5 games by 3 or less an blow out everyone else. Our SRS rating will be high though.
This is Husky Football. We hire shit AD'a who were part of the problem. The majority of the fan base thought Sark was a very good coach. We win sustainability awards.
It's a shit program that has a nice stadium and was relevant 30 years ago. In the 30 years since, how many conference titles has UW been in contention going into the last two weeks of the season? Maybe 3?
I was in denial until Pete's first year. He was so bad that season that it ruined Husky Football for me. Sark was gone and we actually got worse. That preseason was the last time I'll ever doog it up until we win a championship.
I've given up on the program until they win. Give us a fucking championship or get the fuck out. I'm over the mediocrity.
But his comments were Exhibit A of what a bandwagon fan looks like
And it sounds like you care.
Being fed up with a program that has kicked you in the balls for 15 years straight despite copious amounts of time and money invested and sticking with it anyways is NOT the behavior of a bandwagon fan.
What I do have a problem with is those that can't see that there are alternative views and considerations that others have and react as if they are FS or whatever.
There's no way anybody can argue right now that the UW AD is well funded and supported ... and given their track record over the last 20-25 years and in particular the last 10-15 years, it shouldn't be because they haven't adequately proven that they have the chops to properly invest surpluses and run the business well.
You act like we haven't been having this same conversation on repeat for years.
And in all those years, we have been right, and you have been wrong.
I'd say that I hope this helps, but we all know it won't. -
YesJ you don't get it and it doesn't surprise me
Stay classy -
No
Uh huh. Says the dumbass that doesn't understand where the money to fund the AD comes from to begin with. Being a stakeholder doesn't make someone a customer.Tequilla said:J you don't get it and it doesn't surprise me
Stay classy -
Yes
Start by setting your standardsPurpleJ said:Let's get back to talking about our standard for the program and whether we think Pete is the guy. God knows the gutless pussies in charge will never hold anyone to those standards, but it's sure fun to commiserate together with irrelevant banter.
