Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?

167891012»

Comments

  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    No
    okay so it's just doog supposition lol
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    Yes
    Gladstone said:

    okay so it's just doog supposition lol

    As long as you have an apology waiting for me when Smith is out of the picture after this year
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    No
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    okay so it's just doog supposition lol

    As long as you have an apology waiting for me when Smith is out of the picture after this year
    Why would he apologize?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    No
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    okay so it's just doog supposition lol

    As long as you have an apology waiting for me when Smith is out of the picture after this year
    Profile in courage stuff
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    Lots of pressing ...

    He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.

    I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year.

    In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories.
    Distraction?

    Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on?

    And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!

    This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post
    Doogs forget that Peterman could have let him go for nothing instead:

    http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/contract-extensions-announced-for-huskies-assistant-coaches/
    There's a reason he's being kept on for only one year ... making a mountain out of a mole hill on this ... it's FS
    image

  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,878 Standard Supporter
    Yes
    PurpleJ said:

    You'd piss all over yourself to make a @PurpleJ caliber post.

    Tequilla said:

    Pretty sure I wouldn't

    It's On!
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,907 Swaye's Wigwam
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    chuck said:

    I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.

    A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.

    I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.

    Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.

    image
    Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take over
    Smith was a eunuch to begin with. HTH
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,907 Swaye's Wigwam
    Any thread where I can swoop through a get 3 or 4 5th downvote walkoffs on Teq is a winner in my book.
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,134
    Yes

    He has a contract. C'mon, man.

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 36,931 Founders Club
    No
    Preemptive bump.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    No
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    okay so it's just doog supposition lol

    As long as you have an apology waiting for me when Smith is out of the picture after this year
    But how is Tequilla a dumbfuck Doog who learned nothing from 2007 or 2011?
  • MuttzenMuttzen Member Posts: 1,015
    I'm hearing 2016 is a throwaway year
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    Im hearing Colonel Jessup ordered a Code Red.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,525 Founders Club
    Yes
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    Lots of pressing ...

    He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.

    I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year.

    In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories.
    Distraction?

    Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on?

    And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!

    This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post
    Doogs forget that Peterman could have let him go for nothing instead:

    http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/contract-extensions-announced-for-huskies-assistant-coaches/
    There's a reason he's being kept on for only one year ... making a mountain out of a mole hill on this ... it's FS
    Beyond Tedford being hired as a QC coach, what is your source for all of this talk about Jonathan SmithFS being neutered and Tedford taking over? Or is it just supposition? You state it so matter-of-factly that I think I missed some news or press about this.
    The press just runs with what they are told ...

    Pretty sure that there was some talk about this on the TSIO podcast at one point on Smith, Tedford, and the OC situation ...

    Pete runs his business like a well run organization ... generally succession planning in well run organizations takes place in an orderly process were replacements are either identified or trained before being asked to take on the job.

    From what I've heard through the grapevine, which matches what I'm seeing play out, I have no reason to believe that Smith will be here beyond this year. Going back to last year, I said that given his performance that he should have been effectively removed from the equation ... enter Tedford's presence this year. Anybody that thinks that Smith is operating autonomously as OC is fooling themselves.

    Put another way, this is your standard example where you see a low performer get actively managed with additional attention to the point where they either manage themselves out of the role or they end up taking a different role elsewhere as they see the writing on the wall.
    I guess I'm not real familiar with oddball passive aggressive corporate America culture, and sure there are such things as buy outs and severances, but why not just fire his ass well before the season? That's how it works 98% of the time in American football.

    I don't think he's as awful as some do here, but "we" can do better and he's a liability.
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    No

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Baseman said:

    Tequilla said:

    Lots of pressing ...

    He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.

    I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year.

    In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories.
    Distraction?

    Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on?

    And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!

    This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post
    Doogs forget that Peterman could have let him go for nothing instead:

    http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/contract-extensions-announced-for-huskies-assistant-coaches/
    There's a reason he's being kept on for only one year ... making a mountain out of a mole hill on this ... it's FS
    Beyond Tedford being hired as a QC coach, what is your source for all of this talk about Jonathan SmithFS being neutered and Tedford taking over? Or is it just supposition? You state it so matter-of-factly that I think I missed some news or press about this.
    The press just runs with what they are told ...

    Pretty sure that there was some talk about this on the TSIO podcast at one point on Smith, Tedford, and the OC situation ...

    Pete runs his business like a well run organization ... generally succession planning in well run organizations takes place in an orderly process were replacements are either identified or trained before being asked to take on the job.

    From what I've heard through the grapevine, which matches what I'm seeing play out, I have no reason to believe that Smith will be here beyond this year. Going back to last year, I said that given his performance that he should have been effectively removed from the equation ... enter Tedford's presence this year. Anybody that thinks that Smith is operating autonomously as OC is fooling themselves.

    Put another way, this is your standard example where you see a low performer get actively managed with additional attention to the point where they either manage themselves out of the role or they end up taking a different role elsewhere as they see the writing on the wall.
    I guess I'm not real familiar with oddball passive aggressive corporate America culture, and sure there are such things as buy outs and severances, but why not just fire his ass well before the season? That's how it works 98% of the time in American football.

    I don't think he's as awful as some do here, but "we" can do better and he's a liability.
    Two years of data points isn't enough for you?
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,279 Founders Club

    I've been on the "three and see" train and not about to do a hobo jump just yet. This is the defining year. Pete's OKG's are in place, as are his choices for assistant coaches. This is his team, his team culture. If the team breaks out in a big way, it would be hard to argue that he's not the guy. If they remain mired in mediocrity, well then there's your answer, he's not the guy. Where they're at after the first six games this season will be telling. Three preseason games to warm up and then a real three game test, the kind that can define them as potential champions or chumps. I say LIFPO.
Sign In or Register to comment.