Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?
Comments
-
YesThere is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
-
Yes


-
No
I'm just curious as to what evidence points to a "yes" answer...WilburHooksHands said:There is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
-
NoWe suck until proven otherwise.
-
No
Off season natty post of the summer so farLoneStarDawg said:


-
NoToo many spectacularly terrible decisions and red flags for me to give any vote of confidence. Win now or get the fuck out.
Stanford fake punt. Cyler Miles. 52 pass attempts @ ASU. Oregon 2 minute drill. Being "stubborn with the run" (kill me now).
Unlike with his predecessor though, it isn't a complete surefire dumpster. The physicality, conditioning, and general defense are probably the best they've been in the post-DJ era. -
NoIf the offense is better, the defense will be worse and/or have key guys injured. Or we lose 4 or 5 games by 3 or less an blow out everyone else. Our SRS rating will be high though.
This is Husky Football. We hire shit AD'a who were part of the problem. The majority of the fan base thought Sark was a very good coach. We win sustainability awards.
It's a shit program that has a nice stadium and was relevant 30 years ago. In the 30 years since, how many conference titles has UW been in contention going into the last two weeks of the season? Maybe 3?
I was in denial until Pete's first year. He was so bad that season that it ruined Husky Football for me. Sark was gone and we actually got worse. That preseason was the last time I'll ever doog it up until we win a championship.
I've given up on the program until they win. Give us a fucking championship or get the fuck out. I'm over the mediocrity. -
No Natty cakes for Tommy when they do win it this year then,ThomasFremont said:We suck until proven otherwise.
-
Yes
Recruiting, development, and the ability to put together a real roster. The only outstanding question is offensive coaching and as weve said 1000 times its a giant one.PurpleJ said:
I'm just curious as to what evidence points to a "yes" answer...WilburHooksHands said:There is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
-
YesI said 3 years from the get go. Still holding onto hope.
Yes I am a doog.








