Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?

24567…24

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776
    No
    RoadDawg55 said:

    LoneStarDawg said:

    but who would we get that's any better?

    I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.

    I don't think good coaches would line up for this job.
    Maybe grab that young DJ kid out of Kent State or something....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776
    No
    dnc said:

    I'm like 55-45 so I'm much more LIFPO than yes or no. This year will tell us everything we need to know. I'll either be strongly in or strongly out by the time this year is over.

    I admire your faith in the face of evidence to the contrary.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Yes
    We? are mediocre program until proven otherwise. If Pete isn't the guy, it's time for the Big Sky. I don't see the program recovering in any amount of time to hold my interest. Win/win for me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776
    No
    Thread lacks the why?becausewewere7and6?.gif @GrundleStiltzkin
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Yes
    PurpleJ said:

    Thread lacks the image@GrundleStiltzkin

    It's hard. It's hard to poast in this bored day in and day out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776
    No
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Thread lacks the image@GrundleStiltzkin

    It's hard. It's hard to poast in this bored day in and day out.
    Because we were 7-6 last year?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 3,023
    Yes
    Rinse. Repete.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,755 Founders Club
    No
    RoadDawg55 said:

    LoneStarDawg said:

    but who would we get that's any better?

    I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.

    I don't think good coaches would line up for this job.
    It's hard

    The reason you don't fall in love with a mediocre coach like Sark or like Petermen appears to be is the more times you fire the more times you get to hire and get it right. There are not tons of great coaches. Being forced to look for the next one is better than hiring a Ty or even Petermen if he turns out to be like the other Boise losers.

    You're right about our program. It won't stop us from getting lucky but it could stop us from keeping a coach worth keeping
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776
    No
    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    LoneStarDawg said:

    but who would we get that's any better?

    I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.

    I don't think good coaches would line up for this job.
    It's hard

    The reason you don't fall in love with a mediocre coach like Sark or like Petermen appears to be is the more times you fire the more times you get to hire and get it right. There are not tons of great coaches. Being forced to look for the next one is better than hiring a Ty or even Petermen if he turns out to be like the other Boise losers.

    You're right about our program. It won't stop us from getting lucky but it could stop us from keeping a coach worth keeping
    Roll Tide!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter