Too many spectacularly terrible decisions and red flags for me to give any vote of confidence. Win now or get the fuck out.
Stanford fake punt. Cyler Miles. 52 pass attempts @ ASU. Oregon 2 minute drill. Being "stubborn with the run" (kill me now).
Unlike with his predecessor though, it isn't a complete surefire dumpster. The physicality, conditioning, and general defense are probably the best they've been in the post-DJ era.
If the offense is better, the defense will be worse and/or have key guys injured. Or we lose 4 or 5 games by 3 or less an blow out everyone else. Our SRS rating will be high though.
This is Husky Football. We hire shit AD'a who were part of the problem. The majority of the fan base thought Sark was a very good coach. We win sustainability awards.
It's a shit program that has a nice stadium and was relevant 30 years ago. In the 30 years since, how many conference titles has UW been in contention going into the last two weeks of the season? Maybe 3?
I was in denial until Pete's first year. He was so bad that season that it ruined Husky Football for me. Sark was gone and we actually got worse. That preseason was the last time I'll ever doog it up until we win a championship.
I've given up on the program until they win. Give us a fucking championship or get the fuck out. I'm over the mediocrity.
There is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
I'm just curious as to what evidence points to a "yes" answer...
Recruiting, development, and the ability to put together a real roster. The only outstanding question is offensive coaching and as weve said 1000 times its a giant one.
Well even if he wins 10+ it still depends on how we win/lose. If every win is pretty close and we get blown out by both Oregon/Stanford than GTFO.
Your an idiot. WGAF who they win or lose to. Are you suggesting that beating Oregon/Stanford would be better than losing to Arizona/WSU? 10 wins would be huge, and who those wins come against, IDGAF.
10 wins with this schedule, assuming one is the NOGAF Bowl, is not that impressive. That means you swept your shitty non-conference schedule and went 6-3 in one of the worst major conferences in the nation, likely with all three losses coming to actual contenders. It would be incremental progress and enough to buy him year 4, but I wouldn't be impressed or satisfied with that.
Pete could go 7-6 this year and the fan base (the typical doog) would still be excited for next year.
"Last year was disappointing, but we had some injuries and bad luck. We would have beat Oregon if Van Winkle made two FG's. Browning and Gaskin are back. We have hot shot freshmen WR's, the OL is more experienced. This is still a young team.
Most of the defense is back. Thankfully, Sidney Jones was injured so he came back for his senior year. Recruiting is better than ever. This is the year we break out."
Lather, rinse, repeat. Can anyone tell this thread is upsetting me?
Well even if he wins 10+ it still depends on how we win/lose. If every win is pretty close and we get blown out by both Oregon/Stanford than GTFO.
Your an idiot. WGAF who they win or lose to. Are you suggesting that beating Oregon/Stanford would be better than losing to Arizona/WSU? 10 wins would be huge, and who those wins come against, IDGAF.
Comments
Stanford fake punt. Cyler Miles. 52 pass attempts @ ASU. Oregon 2 minute drill. Being "stubborn with the run" (kill me now).
Unlike with his predecessor though, it isn't a complete surefire dumpster. The physicality, conditioning, and general defense are probably the best they've been in the post-DJ era.
This is Husky Football. We hire shit AD'a who were part of the problem. The majority of the fan base thought Sark was a very good coach. We win sustainability awards.
It's a shit program that has a nice stadium and was relevant 30 years ago. In the 30 years since, how many conference titles has UW been in contention going into the last two weeks of the season? Maybe 3?
I was in denial until Pete's first year. He was so bad that season that it ruined Husky Football for me. Sark was gone and we actually got worse. That preseason was the last time I'll ever doog it up until we win a championship.
I've given up on the program until they win. Give us a fucking championship or get the fuck out. I'm over the mediocrity.
Yes I am a doog.
Well even if he wins 10+ it still depends on how we win/lose. If every win is pretty close and we get blown out by both Oregon/Stanford than GTFO.
"Last year was disappointing, but we had some injuries and bad luck. We would have beat Oregon if Van Winkle made two FG's. Browning and Gaskin are back. We have hot shot freshmen WR's, the OL is more experienced. This is still a young team.
Most of the defense is back. Thankfully, Sidney Jones was injured so he came back for his senior year. Recruiting is better than ever. This is the year we break out."
Lather, rinse, repeat. Can anyone tell this thread is upsetting me?
The Pac-12 sucks this year.