I want the Sonics back, and it's possible that this was the best deal that Hansen is willing to make, but property taxes are starting to get out of control as it is and where else are you going to get the money without an income tax.
Unless I've completely misread the entire proposed funding, none of the funding was going to be put in a position where the general population was going to be paying for it regardless of use. The public contribution was going to be all dependent upon those that would use the facility through taxes on tickets, etc. Simply put, if you don't want to pay taxes, then don't go to the arena. No change in anybody's lives as it is.
As someone without kids (and I'm sure I'm not the only person on this bored in this position), I could argue that I'm pissed at some of the taxes that I pay to support educational initiatives because they don't directly impact me. Or, just as likely, I could complain about how much funding goes to furthering the arts given that I don't go to an art museum, a symphony, etc. But who am I say that my interests are better/worse than others.
So you'd be ok with a generation of uneducated maniacs running wild?
More pissed at the fact that the NHL will not be in a position to come
I am a huge hockey fan. But bringing an NHL franchise to Seattle is fucking moronic. The NHL is already way over-expanded. It's failing in half the markets it's in. The NHL season is way too long, the tickets are way too expensive, the talent is way too watered down, and the league is in too many markets that (like Seattle) have no cultural affinity to hockey.
Seattle was a hockey town when the NHL had 6 teams. The Totems were a top minor team and the WHL had playoffs and shit. Vancouver, Oakland, and the rest of the West Coast.
If the NHL had come here in 67 with the Sonics it would still be strong here
More pissed at the fact that the NHL will not be in a position to come
I am a huge hockey fan. But bringing an NHL franchise to Seattle is fucking moronic. The NHL is already way over-expanded. It's failing in half the markets it's in. The NHL season is way too long, the tickets are way too expensive, the talent is way too watered down, and the league is in too many markets that (like Seattle) have no cultural affinity to hockey.
Seattle was a hockey town when the NHL had 6 teams. The Totems were a top minor team and the WHL had playoffs and shit. Vancouver, Oakland, and the rest of the West Coast.
If the NHL had come here in 67 with the Sonics it would still be strong here
1919 Stanley Cup champs baby
Go on Granpda Race. Tell us which of the original six teams played in Seattle.
I want the Sonics back, and it's possible that this was the best deal that Hansen is willing to make, but property taxes are starting to get out of control as it is and where else are you going to get the money without an income tax.
Unless I've completely misread the entire proposed funding, none of the funding was going to be put in a position where the general population was going to be paying for it regardless of use. The public contribution was going to be all dependent upon those that would use the facility through taxes on tickets, etc. Simply put, if you don't want to pay taxes, then don't go to the arena. No change in anybody's lives as it is.
As someone without kids (and I'm sure I'm not the only person on this bored in this position), I could argue that I'm pissed at some of the taxes that I pay to support educational initiatives because they don't directly impact me. Or, just as likely, I could complain about how much funding goes to furthering the arts given that I don't go to an art museum, a symphony, etc. But who am I say that my interests are better/worse than others.
So you'd be ok with another generation of uneducated maniacs running wild?
Seattle area has supported to WHL teams as long as I remember, be it in Suckattle, Kent, Tacoma, and Everett. The NHL could work.
The T-Birds moved from Seattle to Kent. Let that one sink in a bit.
Nothing changed with me. Just got call from FRANNY 5 minutes ago and told me I was to show up inMaltby. If dad has stuff to do have him leave with you. I'll have Anna take me and Dad can leave with you. I would prefer u and dad leave together. I'll ask Anna. Shouldn't be a problem. If she can't I'll let you know
More pissed at the fact that the NHL will not be in a position to come
I am a huge hockey fan. But bringing an NHL franchise to Seattle is fucking moronic. The NHL is already way over-expanded. It's failing in half the markets it's in. The NHL season is way too long, the tickets are way too expensive, the talent is way too watered down, and the league is in too many markets that (like Seattle) have no cultural affinity to hockey.
Seattle DID have a cultural affinity for hockey. The Totems were huge in the 50s and 60s and Seattle was supposed to get an NHL team in '76 and again in '90 but financing fell through and other interests blocked it.
The Tbirds had a good following at the Coliseum and even now in Kent they draw decent crowds (the Tips do really well in Everett.)
When I played in men's leagues in the last ten years there were hundreds of teams.
NHL teams are failing in two markets not half of markets. And they would succeed in Arizona if they were in Phoenix or Scotsdale and will be fine in Sunrise now that they have a winner. NHL would do fine here. I said for years they need to take advantage of the potential of a PNW rivalry threesome with Portland and Vancouver but MLS beat them to it with resounding success.
More pissed at the fact that the NHL will not be in a position to come
I am a huge hockey fan. But bringing an NHL franchise to Seattle is fucking moronic. The NHL is already way over-expanded. It's failing in half the markets it's in. The NHL season is way too long, the tickets are way too expensive, the talent is way too watered down, and the league is in too many markets that (like Seattle) have no cultural affinity to hockey.
Seattle DID have a cultural affinity for hockey. The Totems were huge in the 50s and 60s and Seattle was supposed to get an NHL team in '76 and again in '90 but financing fell through and other interests blocked it.
The Tbirds had a good following at the Coliseum and even now in Kent they draw decent crowds (the Tips do really well in Everett.)
When I played in men's leagues in the last ten years there were hundreds of teams.
NHL teams are failing in two markets not half of markets. And they would succeed in Arizona if they were in Phoenix or Scotsdale and will be fine in Sunrise now that they have a winner. NHL would do fine here. I said for years they need to take advantage of the potential of a PNW rivalry threesome with Portland and Vancouver but MLS beat them to it with resounding success.
There are tons of dipshits here that would spend entertainment dollars on losing hockey teams rather than another flat screen or whatever for their house. Just look at the Mariners.
More pissed at the fact that the NHL will not be in a position to come
I am a huge hockey fan. But bringing an NHL franchise to Seattle is fucking moronic. The NHL is already way over-expanded. It's failing in half the markets it's in. The NHL season is way too long, the tickets are way too expensive, the talent is way too watered down, and the league is in too many markets that (like Seattle) have no cultural affinity to hockey.
Seattle was a hockey town when the NHL had 6 teams. The Totems were a top minor team and the WHL had playoffs and shit. Vancouver, Oakland, and the rest of the West Coast.
If the NHL had come here in 67 with the Sonics it would still be strong here
1919 Stanley Cup champs baby
Damn your 31 minutes. Go Metropolitans (boo Spanish Influenza.)
More pissed at the fact that the NHL will not be in a position to come
I am a huge hockey fan. But bringing an NHL franchise to Seattle is fucking moronic. The NHL is already way over-expanded. It's failing in half the markets it's in. The NHL season is way too long, the tickets are way too expensive, the talent is way too watered down, and the league is in too many markets that (like Seattle) have no cultural affinity to hockey.
Seattle was a hockey town when the NHL had 6 teams. The Totems were a top minor team and the WHL had playoffs and shit. Vancouver, Oakland, and the rest of the West Coast.
If the NHL had come here in 67 with the Sonics it would still be strong here
1919 Stanley Cup champs baby
Damn your 31 minutes. Go Metropolitans (boo Spanish Influenza.)
Maybe seeing it for the 2nd time will help Jerry get his head out of his ass
Comments
If the NHL had come here in 67 with the Sonics it would still be strong here
1919 Stanley Cup champs baby
The Tbirds had a good following at the Coliseum and even now in Kent they draw decent crowds (the Tips do really well in Everett.)
When I played in men's leagues in the last ten years there were hundreds of teams.
NHL teams are failing in two markets not half of markets. And they would succeed in Arizona if they were in Phoenix or Scotsdale and will be fine in Sunrise now that they have a winner. NHL would do fine here. I said for years they need to take advantage of the potential of a PNW rivalry threesome with Portland and Vancouver but MLS beat them to it with resounding success.
1919 was when we (WE!) were going to be champs, but the tournament was cancelled due to the Flu.
First team to bring Lord Stanley's cup south of the border.
Maybe a 3rd time will get your head out